![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Dec 2004
1012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
I just see a huge (mostly blank) page. What portrait?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Dec 2004
5 Posts |
my method mersenne.exe is formidable. the bond that I posed speak about an extraordinary remark. But it proves that the forum is not interested of the numbers of mersennes. Is my remark good or not??
http://www.geocities.com/romanesquefr/primordial.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Feb 2003
1668 Posts |
If you want more answers, please try to be clear when you make a statement. If you tell me what remark you are talking about in the previous post, I might be able to offer an opinion about it.
In general, on any given forum (math, games, guns, pets, you name it) when you post something RELATED TO THE FORUM and nobody answers it means: 1. Nobody actually cares about the subject 2. Nobody is smart enought to answer 3. You ask the wrong question, or you ask a valid question the wrong way I'll let you guess which of the three scenarios is the most likely to be the case here ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
13·89 Posts |
I may be misunderstanding your diagram, but doesn't it imply that the Mersenne prime following 2^7-1 is 2^11-1?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Dec 2004
58 Posts |
thank you for your attention..
the thing is clear, by chance I made a list of numbers odd, I made behind a normal list of numbers. the coincidence is that in front of each mersenne number a number corresponds which can be written form 2^n whereas the other numbers do not have it. It isn't this is facil? with another remark that I did it,the ball is buckled . I seek a programmer network to find the 42 mersenne number with this nonmathematical method but 100% correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
230708 Posts |
I think that this is a case of a 'law' holding up for a pattern of 3 numbers. Using a diagram with arrow and such is troubling to understand.
I assume that "romanesquefr" is from France. Prehaps they can post an explanation here in French and one of our number that is fluent in French and math can explain the theory. If it is supposed that ((2)^2)^.... "classification" is what leads to prime merseenes, that seems to fail. 4096^2 = 16777216 16777216 * 2 = 33554432 33554432 - 1 = 33554431 33554431 = 31 x 601 x 1801 <- not prime Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2004-12-16 at 00:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
13×89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
23×1,223 Posts |
I think that you found is that a Mersenne number is derived from a power of 2.
Look at this: 2^9 -1 = 511 (511 + 1) / 2 = 256 256 = 2^8 9 - 8 = 1 Your "classification" is always 1 less than the original exponent. Please don't take what I say as an attack on you as a person. I am trying to understand what you mean and at the same time trying to help you understand why I think that what you found does not generate Merseenne primes. You may try to make your whole diagram flow from left to right. Explain what each step means in simple words. What do you mean by "classification"? Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2004-12-16 at 00:09 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Dec 2004
5 Posts |
je suis francophone. que quelqu'un traduit mon message.
parfois l'imagination sert mieux la programmation que les mathématiques. Faire des remarques apparentes sur un phénomène ici les nombres de mersennes ces remlarques serveront de base pour les cerner. Entrons dans le vive du sujet: Un nombre mersenne est un nombre premier d'accord mais avant c'est un nombre impaire n'est-ce pas? dressons un liste des nombres impaires et remarquons la position de chaque nombre mersenne. nous voyons que 3 est dans la 2 ème position après le 1 que 7 est dans la 4 ème position après le 1 3 5 que le 31 est dans la 16ème position. si on prend maintenant que les position des nombres de mersenne on aura 2 4 16 des nombres qui s'écrivent de la forme 2^n je parle ici d'une particularité des nombres de mersenne dont la position à la différence des autres nombres premiers ou non peut s'écrire de la forme 2^n sans entrer ici dans des calculs ou autres détail. J'ai trouvé une autre remarque qui avec la première ne caractérise que les nombres mersennes. avec la programmation de ces deux remarques on ne générera que les nombres mersenne c'est sûr et certain. merci de traduire ce message pour le forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||||||||||||
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
Before I start, I'd like to make clear I'm not really a native French speaker. I have taken French classes for many years, but its definitely not my first language. But I'll give it a shot anyway.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Number of distinct prime factors of a Double Mersenne number | aketilander | Operazione Doppi Mersennes | 1 | 2012-11-09 21:16 |
| Number of Factors for a Mersenne Number | kurtulmehtap | Math | 12 | 2010-05-03 14:02 |
| product of the n first mersenne number | kerguilloud | Math | 6 | 2005-01-20 10:16 |
| Mersenne-Number Notation? | Unregistered | Math | 4 | 2004-09-30 21:32 |
| Mersenne NUmber Factoring | andi314 | Math | 4 | 2002-11-26 14:25 |