Report Results Here - Page 77

Rodrigo · 2011-11-23, 20:16

M3321936757 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

Rodrigo

lavalamp · 2011-11-25, 15:34

no factor for M3321930439 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934697 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934757 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934783 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934801 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934831 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934909 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934951 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

lavalamp · 2011-11-30, 03:30

no factor for M3321930347 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321930349 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321930371 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321930397 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

Christenson · 2011-12-01, 02:48

no factor for M3321930211 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32]

lavalamp · 2011-12-06, 08:48

no factor for M3321928963 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321929041 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321929053 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321929059 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

Rodrigo · 2011-12-07, 05:18

M3321936811 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

Rodrigo

Rodrigo · 2011-12-20, 06:13

What, no one else has reported anything since my last one?!

M3321936857 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

Rodrigo

Uncwilly · 2011-12-20, 06:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodrigo

What, no one else has reported anything since my last one?!

I think that the GPUto72 project has claimed most of the cycles. (this is a good thing, since OBD is more fun than functional.)

Christenson · 2011-12-20, 21:28

My TF computer is down at the moment...my farm with the GT480 still out of reach...and the easy targets are gone, factored by Lavalamp!

lavalamp · 2011-12-20, 23:29

Sorry! I just wanted to get them all to 82 bits.

And when I get back I'll start working on getting them to 83 bits.

Rodrigo · 2011-12-31, 20:18

M3321936941 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

Happy New Year!

Rodrigo

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What does * represent on Recent Results report?	petrw1	PrimeNet	5	2018-07-09 21:14
Report for PRP	houding	PrimeNet	15	2018-01-10 19:24
How to report GPU results	dcorbit	Information & Answers	4	2012-08-13 21:53
How to report P-1 results	James Heinrich	Marin's Mersenne-aries	6	2004-05-27 05:47
Bug report	remaker	Software	4	2002-10-17 08:18

2011-11-23, 20:16	#837
Rodrigo Jun 2010 Pennsylvania 2·467 Posts	M3321936757 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits. Rodrigo

2011-11-25, 15:34	#838
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 23×59 Posts	no factor for M3321930439 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934697 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934757 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934783 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934801 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934831 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934909 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934951 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

2011-11-30, 03:30	#839
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 23·59 Posts	no factor for M3321930347 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930349 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930371 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930397 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

2011-12-01, 02:48	#840
Christenson Dec 2010 Monticello 5×359 Posts	no factor for M3321930211 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32]

2011-12-06, 08:48	#841
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 23·59 Posts	no factor for M3321928963 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321929041 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321929053 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321929059 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

2011-12-07, 05:18	#842
Rodrigo Jun 2010 Pennsylvania 2×467 Posts	M3321936811 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits. Rodrigo

2011-12-20, 06:13	#843
Rodrigo Jun 2010 Pennsylvania 2·467 Posts	What, no one else has reported anything since my last one?! M3321936857 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits. Rodrigo

2011-12-20, 21:28	#845
Christenson Dec 2010 Monticello 5×359 Posts	My TF computer is down at the moment...my farm with the GT480 still out of reach...and the easy targets are gone, factored by Lavalamp!

2011-12-20, 23:29	#846
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 23×59 Posts	Sorry! I just wanted to get them all to 82 bits. And when I get back I'll start working on getting them to 83 bits.

2011-12-31, 20:18	#847
Rodrigo Jun 2010 Pennsylvania 2·467 Posts	M3321936941 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits. Happy New Year! Rodrigo