Report Results Here - Page 76

lavalamp · 2011-11-04, 15:45

no factor for M3321933113 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321933179 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321933193 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321933253 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321933289 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321933313 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321933337 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321933361 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

Christenson · 2011-11-06, 15:12

no factor for M3321930347 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32]

Rodrigo · 2011-11-08, 05:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

I'm collecting Rodrigo's results, filtering them and adding his work to yours.
Luigi

Luigi,

I never did get to hear what this means.

Rodrigo

ET_ · 2011-11-08, 10:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodrigo

Luigi,

I never did get to hear what this means.

Rodrigo

Uncwilly gave me a HUGE list of OBD exponents. Most of them had some TF and some factors already. We decided to maintain a list and keep a pointer to it, to use when opening new ranges on OBD.

Now, you are working on some of these not-yet-released ranges, and I am updating the list with your results.

Luigi

Rodrigo · 2011-11-09, 01:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Uncwilly gave me a HUGE list of OBD exponents. Most of them had some TF and some factors already. We decided to maintain a list and keep a pointer to it, to use when opening new ranges on OBD.

Now, you are working on some of these not-yet-released ranges, and I am updating the list with your results.

Luigi

Thanks, Luigi.

My personal goal (beyond that of helping to advance OBD) is, when the results get published, to be in the top half of OBD contributors... by sheer persistence with that vintage machine.

Rodrigo

Christenson · 2011-11-10, 04:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodrigo

Thanks, Luigi.

My personal goal (beyond that of helping to advance OBD) is, when the results get published, to be in the top half of OBD contributors... by sheer persistence with that vintage machine.

Rodrigo

Lavalamp is going to make that very, very tough....and so am I....

Rodrigo · 2011-11-10, 05:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christenson

Lavalamp is going to make that very, very tough....and so am I....

Depending on how many others are currently participating, given my modest objective (50% +1 in the historical rankings) I don't need to pass you and lavalamp, just those who are no longer contributing. Hence the "sheer persistence" part.

Rodrigo

Rodrigo · 2011-11-10, 16:37

Inching ever closer to my ultimate goal...

M3321936707 has a factor: 304268819269306516817
M3321936707 has a factor: 1541821394236021382279

Done from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

Rodrigo

lavalamp · 2011-11-11, 15:52

no factor for M3321933367 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321933389 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321933451 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321933541 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321933551 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934003 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934051 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934129 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

Christenson · 2011-11-12, 18:52

no factor for M3321930349 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32]

lavalamp · 2011-11-19, 02:36

no factor for M3321934163 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934193 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934243 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934247 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934307 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934379 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

no factor for M3321934537 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321934607 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What does * represent on Recent Results report?	petrw1	PrimeNet	5	2018-07-09 21:14
Report for PRP	houding	PrimeNet	15	2018-01-10 19:24
How to report GPU results	dcorbit	Information & Answers	4	2012-08-13 21:53
How to report P-1 results	James Heinrich	Marin's Mersenne-aries	6	2004-05-27 05:47
Bug report	remaker	Software	4	2002-10-17 08:18

2011-11-04, 15:45	#826
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 23×59 Posts	no factor for M3321933113 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933179 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933193 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933253 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933289 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933313 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933337 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933361 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

2011-11-06, 15:12	#827
Christenson Dec 2010 Monticello 703₁₆ Posts	no factor for M3321930347 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32]

2011-11-10, 16:37	#833
Rodrigo Jun 2010 Pennsylvania 934₁₀ Posts	Inching ever closer to my ultimate goal... M3321936707 has a factor: 304268819269306516817 M3321936707 has a factor: 1541821394236021382279 Done from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits. Rodrigo

2011-11-11, 15:52	#834
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 23·59 Posts	no factor for M3321933367 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933389 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933451 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933541 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321933551 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934003 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934051 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934129 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]

2011-11-12, 18:52	#835
Christenson Dec 2010 Monticello 703₁₆ Posts	no factor for M3321930349 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32]

2011-11-19, 02:36	#836
lavalamp Oct 2007 Manchester, UK 10101001101₂ Posts	no factor for M3321934163 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934193 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934243 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934247 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934307 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934379 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934537 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321934607 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.17-Win barrett92_mul32]