M1061...

[Andi47]

Do I understand it correctly - adding Bruce Dodsons curves and the curves above, there are still approx. 13,4% = ca. 2400 curves to be done at B1 = 110M?

[bdodson]

Originally Posted by Andi47

Do I understand it correctly - adding Bruce Dodsons curves and the curves above, there are still approx. 13,4% = ca. 2400 curves to be done at B1 = 110M?

Sounds good to me. Between Bob's persistent (and not factually
supported) nagging and induced subsequent off-topic posts, I had
a hard time telling. Lazyness on my part, sorry.

Having re-read the (relevant parts of the) thread starting from
locating the t50 finish, recent collected totals seem to be ...

Mystwalker, message #220 (another Bob-rant, #230)
Mystwalker, message #232 (yet another Bob-rant, #243; my reply above)

OK, I'm following, more-or-less, to the 36.94% in Mystwalker #232
(with a minor mis-print, .255 was the #215 total; the correct
#220 --- top right --- should have been .3248, which does fit
with 39.94%). The above post claims another 47.46%, for a total
of 87.43%. So if the curves reported between #232 and #252 were
uniform ecm default B2-curves ... Well, no point in attempting to
finish that sentance. My 47% was using the ecm-6.01 default for
B1=110M, for which B2=680270182898 and a complete test (to .62
prob of finding a known p55) of 17899 curves. So do Xyzzy and Marc
above. Mystwalker is using 198e9 (that's -vs- 680e9) for /23287;
and I see a 4.2G b2 fraction of /58072 back in #212.

So as I was saying, Mystwalker (and Alex) surely have a reliable 39.94%.
So between your #241 and Geoff's #252, what are the acumulated %'s?
Geoff claims 2.23%, for a total 89.76%. Looks like your posts #241,
#242 and #244 have the reported curves, with subsequent posts not
adding curves? That would be ... Well, I'm puzzled. You report a total
of 5+10 b1=110M curves with prime95 default b2 plus 10+14 b1=110M
curves with 2 different ecm6 defaults in two day's post, then a day later
1000 curves (!) with b1=260M (!) and back to prime95 defaults. I don't
see a Kruppa-fraction for b1/b2 = 260M/4.2G; we'll have to come up
with one to see how much of the 10.24% of a t55 you've done. First
thing I'd like to hear is a confirmation (and maybe an explanation, even)
that you went from reporting 39 b1=110M curves to reporting 1000
b1=260M virtually over-night!

Just for reference, 10.24% of /17899 would be 1833 curves,
10.24 of /23287 would be 2385 curves. Ah. That latter figure
is pretty much your 2400 curves, not counting your #244 curves.

Thanks for the reply! Bruce Dodson

[Andi47]

Originally Posted by bdodson

You report a total
of 5+10 b1=110M curves with prime95 default b2 plus 10+14 b1=110M
curves with 2 different ecm6 defaults in two day's post, then a day later
1000 curves (!) with b1=260M (!) and back to prime95 defaults. I don't
see a Kruppa-fraction for b1/b2 = 260M/4.2G;

Nope, these 1000 curves were posted 2 months later. I reported my 5+10+10+14 curves in the end of march, and the 1000 curves on 31st of may

[bdodson]

Originally Posted by Andi47

Nope, these 1000 curves were posted 2 months later. I reported my 5+10+10+14 curves in the end of march, and the 1000 curves on 31st of may

Excellent! My new prescription glasses are supposed to arrive this
week (2.xx -> 3.xx, each eye), but I'm still not sure that I would have
caught the mar -vs may --- not sure why the date format is saving
pixels, to the detriment of those of us on the wrong side of 50.

So the remaining curve count is Certainly under 2000. It may be
easier (for me) to run some more curves than to get a single -v
curve into the condor/Opteron queue. The same submit script
could start another ... Well, OK. -nontt to get B2 closer to the
command line 4.29G? And 500 new ecm6.1 b1=110M curves. New
estimate should be up in a day or less.

bdodson (new base-7 p49 today!)

[bdodson]

Originally Posted by bdodson

It may be easier (for me) to run some more curves
than to get a single -v curve into the condor/Opteron queue. The same
submit script could start another ... Well, OK. -nontt to get B2 closer
to the command line 4.29G? And 500 new ecm6.1 b1=110M curves. New
estimate should be up in a day or less.

(Sorry for the self-quote; this is a continuation of the reply to
Andi47.) As expected, my condor -v script crashed, but I did
get a -v from a linux/xeon ecm-6.01; with a Kruppa-fraction
denominator of /29285 with B2' = 4.85G. Close enough, and
1000/29285 = 3.41%. The 500 new b1=110M curves ran without
objection, for another 500/17899 = 2.79%. That makes

89.76 + 3.41 + 2.79 = 95.96%

So the update to Andi47's first reply is .0404 * 23287 = 941
curves or .0404 * 17899 = 724 curves or ...
I have 5 * 3 *300 curves with b1 = 260M to reduce 600 to 300
(left to run) on the t50 of c195-c210, which will take 1.5 days if
the Opteron cluster is mostly idle. I'll fit 724 b1=110M curves in
before the 2nd (300 curve * 99 numbers, 98 with the 7+ factorization)
and last pass for t50 --- unless someone else will run them sooner?
So maybe a final update wed evening on the t55 of M1061.

Bruce Dodson

[Prime95]

Super! Then we can start a new thread "M1061 - t60".

[bdodson]

Originally Posted by Prime95

Super! Then we can start a new thread "M1061 - t60".

OK, I shifted the queue a bit; 724 new gmp-ecm-6.1 curves
with b1=110M, for that last 4.04%. If/when we're starting a
t60 count, it's worth recalling (above, somewhere, this thread)
that our t55 is actually a "t50 + (t55-t50)" --- that is, we
counted the curves from t50, mostly with p50-limits. That's
fair and good for t55, but t60 should only start with the
(t55-t50) curves, not including the t50's.

Thanks to all of the forum people helping count and run curves!
Maybe a new t60 thread is a good idea --- so whoever's trying
to figure the "current t60 status" won't have to look through all
of this thread too? Questions, comments on t55 could continue
here (seems to me, not that anyone asked).

Bruce Dodson

[Jwb52z]

Has this factoring been abandoned? I just wanted to check on the status because it's been almost a year and a half now since it was last posted about in the forum.

[Andi47]

Originally Posted by Jwb52z

Has this factoring been abandoned? I just wanted to check on the status because it's been almost a year and a half now since it was last posted about in the forum.

M1061 has been continued in this thread.