mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-07-05, 05:06   #1
cd1940
 
Feb 2004

3 Posts
Question Iteration times slow compared to benchmark

Hello,

It seems like my machine is taking too long to complete the primality test and I was hoping for some guidance on how to correct this.

I looked at http://mersenne.org/bench.htm and entered the specs for my mahcine (P4 2.8 ghz, running 24hrs) using Prime95 version 23.8.1 and it says and that it should take about 21 days to complete a number of that size (see below) but mine has been running for 38 days and is not even half the way thru. My machine has a iteration time 0.162 compared with the bench mark of 0.058. My Task manager says CPU utilization is: system idle process 88 and Prime95 12. I have not made any changes to Processor Affinity.

prime fact current days exponent bits iteration run / to go / exp date updated date assigned computer ID Mhz Ver

24634549 68 11770624 38.3 17.0 77.0 05-Jul-04 04:16 27-May-04 22:59 storm 2793 v19/v20

any ideas? thanks for your time.
cd1940 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-07-05, 07:47   #2
optim
 
optim's Avatar
 
Nov 2003
European Union

23·13 Posts
Default virus?

maybe you have some virus/trojan/worm problems? Some viruses have this behaviour (stealing CPU cycles). Please check your Windows system with a good antivirus (such as PCcillin - www.antivirus.com or Panda www.pandasoftware.com ) or switch to Linux

However, I have seen viruses to steal cycles through svchost process but not through the idle process. Perhaps you should check your HyperThreading too?

Last fiddled with by optim on 2004-07-05 at 07:50
optim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-07-05, 15:39   #3
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

5×11×137 Posts
Default

Have you looked in task manager to see if prime95 is getting 95+% of the CPU time? Have you disabled screen savers and power save features?
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-07-05, 16:08   #4
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·52·7 Posts
Default

Hey folks cd1940 said:
My Task manager says CPU utilization is: system idle process 88 and Prime95 12.
Joe O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-07-05, 17:55   #5
TauCeti
 
TauCeti's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
Braunschweig, Germany

3428 Posts
Default

Hmm, strange one.

Some ideas: Do you use Windows XP?

Does your System idle process (check in task manager) only use a tiny amount of memory (20k on my machine)? Just to make sure it is really the 'normal' idle process and not some disguised malware.

You could raise prime95 priority with the advanced/priority command. Try setting it to '9'. You find the password to enable those advanced functions in the readme.txt (section ADVANCED MENU)

If you use win XP you can also try to boot in safe mode and check if the situation stays the same.

I thought about the possibility that your cooling solution is malfunctionung (can you check the CPU temperature?) but i don't think you would get high idle time that way.

but: can you run some benchmark like Sysmark or SiSoft Sandra? Just to make sure your system performs ok in general.

Ok, a lot of wild guesses here but maybe a lucky hit...

Tau
TauCeti is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iteration times in i5 and i7 Jud McCranie Information & Answers 53 2013-08-17 19:09
What are your per-iteration times? LiquidNitrogen Hardware 22 2011-07-12 23:15
LLR.exe FFT crossovers and iteration times SlashDude 15k Search 0 2004-01-28 05:47
slow iteration times PLeopard Hardware 9 2003-10-29 05:48
Slow iteration times with 23.7 smoffat Software 13 2003-10-22 22:50

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:53.


Sun Aug 1 20:53:00 UTC 2021 up 9 days, 15:21, 0 users, load averages: 1.36, 1.44, 1.55

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.