![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: In what range will be find our next prime? | |||
| Under 1.1 Million |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| Between 1.1 and 1.3 Million |
|
6 | 31.58% |
| Between 1.3 and 1.5 Million |
|
5 | 26.32% |
| Between 1.5 and 2.0 Million |
|
4 | 21.05% |
| Above 2.0 Million |
|
3 | 15.79% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3×277 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2·53·71 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Jun 2003
110001011102 Posts |
Thanks for your help. I had to go with an Intel Celeron as that was the cheapest in the market. Let me see how much contribution I can make to the project with the new laptop.
Citrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
The Celeron is just as fast as the P4. You'll zip through the PRP tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Jun 2003
30568 Posts |
So do I then use LLR4/PRP3 that is the best for P4's.
Citrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
Yes, either LLRP4 or PRP3 is perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
I found in my tests that LLRP4 in the latest version creates residues that are different to the PRP3 and LLRnet residues so please use PRP3 if you can.
Lars |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Jun 2003
110001011102 Posts |
May be both of them use a different base? Not sure, but we should figure this out.
Does anyone know? Citrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Jun 2003
2·7·113 Posts |
Just an FYI, based on the frequencies data we are supposed to find 5 primes in the range n=2^20 to 2^21 which is n from 1.05 M to 2.1 M.
Since we are at 1.35 M and about 0.75M is left to be searched we might find a prime every .15M or every 6000 test we do. Also since we are doing ~3000 test per month, this means that we should find a prime every two months. Lets see when and which k goes first. Citrix
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3·277 Posts |
Quote:
![]() My expectation was wrong - the prime came earlier. I'm not exactly sad, though.
Last fiddled with by Mystwalker on 2005-01-24 at 21:12 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! | dabaichi | News | 571 | 2020-10-26 11:02 |
| Twin Prime Days, Prime Day Clusters | cuBerBruce | Puzzles | 3 | 2014-12-01 18:15 |
| disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD? | emily | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-03-01 05:49 |
| Prime Cullen Prime, Rest in Peace | hhh | Prime Cullen Prime | 4 | 2007-09-21 16:34 |
| The 40th known Mersenne prime, 220996011-1 is not PRIME! | illman-q | Miscellaneous Math | 33 | 2004-09-19 05:02 |