![]() |
|
|
#628 | |
|
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
24×5×11 Posts |
Quote:
https://www.mersenne.org/report_fact...99&tftobits=72 factor=168554021,76,77 factor=168554039,76,77 factor=168554053,76,77 .............. factor=168554861,76,77 factor=168554963,76,77 factor=168554993,76,77 exclude M168554723 https://www.mersenne.org/report_fact...99&tftobits=72 <- I'd like to see that M168641923 with a "Yes" on the PRP Status column of the data page. With all the M168,***,*23 exponents showing, the PRP Test Verified of Yes or No can be really useful for me to find the next target to work on - https://www.mersenne.org/report_fact...99&tftobits=72 ~[Exponents]~ PRP: Verified M168306023 -:- Yes M168316123 -:- No M168326623 -:- Yes M168336323 -:- No M168346723 -:- Yes M168366823 -:- Yes M168386423 -:- Yes M168396223 -:- No M168396523 -:- Yes M168396923 -:- No Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2022-12-10 at 04:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#629 | |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
7×13×47 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#630 |
|
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
88010 Posts |
It has basically met my needs. Only 1 minor bug that the LL test of M168288023 was not detected.
Thanks a lot, I can see the whole list very clearly - https://www.mersenne.org/report_fact...=79&bits_hi=84 - the total quantity of the verified M168,***,*23 is still very minority of all the available candidates. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2022-12-10 at 05:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
#632 | |
|
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
24×5×11 Posts |
Quote:
1 M168M exponent was chosen for the trial factoring with my name displaying on the background Windows desktop of the screenshot below to prove it's my GPU. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2022-12-15 at 08:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#633 |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
7·13·47 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#634 | |
|
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
11011100002 Posts |
The reason of the failure to generate the proof file of my only problematic PRP of M168286523 remained a mystery. Since then, I've not experienced this situation again, all later PRP results got certified including M168572023 which was finished earlier today.
The screenshot on the bottom of this post shows that my Ryzen 7950 CPU is capable passing 13 Gerbicz error checks on M168426023, so all good now. Quote:
Example: The definitions of a man and/or a woman from the history of a century ago and the debates going on within the U.S. government about this topic during year 2022. Consider if someone owns a time travel device and can bring the lengthy debates of 2022 to the people lived back in 1922, how the 1922 people would react, probably a lot of similarities compare to the dozenal vs decimal conversions. Running trial factoring of a specific M168M exponent from 282 to 283 will take only around 10 hours and 45 minutes on my fastest GPU today. However the time duration requires to run the PRP test of a specific M168M exponent using Radeon VII or Radeon RX 7900 XTX have not been shortened by the same ratio. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2022-12-17 at 22:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#635 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2B3B16 Posts |
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#636 | |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
10000101101012 Posts |
Quote:
You seem very keen to toe a line on P-1 bounds (despite Prime95's better judgement) and then totally ignore the recommendations on TF. Your hardware of course, but what you're doing is not optimal for GIMPS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#637 | |
|
"Tucker Kao"
Jan 2020
Head Base M168202123
24×5×11 Posts |
Quote:
I'm not sure how to find the methods that SRBase had quickly mass reserved everything. This has been the reason why I mostly only work on the M168M exponents, so poaching don't keep happening because total numbers of active M168M assignments of other users are usually less than 10 besides my own. The exponents that have been brought up to 279 or higher are mostly in the format of M168,***,*23, so they stand out from other exponents in the same range: https://www.mersenne.org/report_fact...=79&bits_hi=84 I also don't know how Kriesel uploads the PRP proof files from GPUOwl, so I just use Prime95 as it's automatic. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2022-12-18 at 03:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#638 | ||
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
7×13×47 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
It's very easy to get registered assignments: 1) Go to https://www.mersenne.org/manual_gpu_assignment/ 2) Choose how many assignments you want (based on what you described, you need 50-60 per week) 3) Enter exponent range (168000000 to 169000000 if that's the range you like) 4) For 168M range, enter 78 in the factor-to field. Not higher. 5) Click "Get Assignments", and there you go. TF them all, report results, and repeat once a week. Just put the .proof files in your Prime95 folder and it will upload them automatically. Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2022-12-18 at 03:19 |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Automatic fetch of Trial Factoring work for GPU mfakt* | LaurV | GPU to 72 | 81 | 2020-12-02 05:17 |
| Simple Script to get Trial Factoring Work | jfamestad | PrimeNet | 3 | 2016-11-06 20:32 |
| Why trial factoring work chopped into chunks? | lidocorc | PrimeNet | 4 | 2008-11-06 18:48 |
| How does the trial factoring work with 15K*2^n-1 | jocelynl | 15k Search | 0 | 2003-07-11 14:23 |
| How does trial-factoring work? | ThomRuley | Software | 5 | 2003-05-30 20:34 |