![]() |
|
|
#133 | ||
|
Jan 2020
2×5×37 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
I'll also run some of the PRP tests myself, but it's really not my fault that the new video card models are way above the MSP $. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2021-06-14 at 23:31 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#134 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
100110001101102 Posts |
Quote:
Funny in its own quirky way...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
607 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
100110011101002 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
Jan 2021
California
100110102 Posts |
Quote:
Until and unless you can show a mathematical basis for your guesses (and not mystic mumbo-jumbo, base 12 is magic, or "this extremely small sample size suggests that..") your guesses actually mean nothing and might as well be random. Now there are a lot of possible candidates for Mersenne Primes, so picking some silly basis for your guesses is probably no worse than just taking the next one in line (except that it takes longer to test than the smaller untested numbers). Last fiddled with by slandrum on 2021-06-15 at 04:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Jun 2003
5,087 Posts |
![]() Exactly this. Frankly, I expect with the amount of cranks that pass thru this forum, eventually someone will get a lucky hit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×23×107 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
Jan 2020
2×5×37 Posts |
Quote:
https://www.mersenne.ca/status/tf/0/20210201/4/16800 I'm still waiting for the moment when I will have the 1st factor found between 2^75 to 2^78 from a M168M exponent. There are around 1,200 total available M168,***,*23 exponents, so the sample size should eventually match up the standard, slightly less than 200 of them have been touched as of today. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2021-06-15 at 17:24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#141 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×23×107 Posts |
That is watermelons vs. bowling balls. Figuring out if your factoring work is tracking what it should be is 1 thing. Finding a new prime is something totally different. Your monomania for baseless base claims has blinded you to reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
Jan 2020
5628 Posts |
Quote:
I'll patiently wait for the new PC model, I can barely prepare up to 2 to 3 M168M exponents for Ben Delo to run the PRPs per week with my current PC. M168174323, M168314323 and M168704323 have reached the PRP ready status (TF to 2^78 and P-1 finished), I don't know when Ben Delo will be online again, he can take those when he checks back here the next time. Last fiddled with by tuckerkao on 2021-06-17 at 18:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22·23·107 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Automatic fetch of Trial Factoring work for GPU mfakt* | LaurV | GPU to 72 | 81 | 2020-12-02 05:17 |
| Simple Script to get Trial Factoring Work | jfamestad | PrimeNet | 3 | 2016-11-06 20:32 |
| Why trial factoring work chopped into chunks? | lidocorc | PrimeNet | 4 | 2008-11-06 18:48 |
| How does the trial factoring work with 15K*2^n-1 | jocelynl | 15k Search | 0 | 2003-07-11 14:23 |
| How does trial-factoring work? | ThomRuley | Software | 5 | 2003-05-30 20:34 |