![]() |
|
|
#78 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2×5×11×47 Posts |
So on readme.txt you have ProofPower examples from 7 to 10, but on undoc.txt you state that ProofPower can go from 5 to 12., which one prevails? Is the former only to show examples?
edit: Upload runs fine from UK buy my upload speed is way above the UK average. Good work! Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2020-08-15 at 17:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
3×953 Posts |
There is one thing about the running of certifications I do not understand, the download limit. This is in megabytes. I am running a certification now. The only thing I see is the assignment line in worktodo.txt. I guess I was expecting to see something larger downloaded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
B6816 Posts |
Quote:
From what i've seen, the 'usual' power for 87M cert is a ProofPower of 8. Whith an additionnal spare space of 10 G, I work with a PP ( spare the jokes) of 9. Each adittionnal PP double the temp file space needed, for a marginal speed increase. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 | ||
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
201278 Posts |
Quote:
The actual proof power is determined by the available temp disk space (up to the maximum proof power that makes sense). Going into more detail than is necessary, if you don't give prime95 much temp disk space it will run a 7-by-2, 6-by-2, or 5-by-3 proof. A 7-by-2 is a power=7 proof on the first half and again on the second half of the PRP test. This simulates a power=8 proof using half the disk space and twice the bandwidth. Quote:
Correct, except that power=9 is the maximum. Power 10 becomes a possibility at 108,000,000. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
143216 Posts |
Thank you for the above details.
Have a fast landline connection but a slower PC, will have to run the PRP DC CF or PRP CF only. Is there a way to only accept CERT work done by front wave? Have the bandwidth but not the CPU power for first time PRP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17·487 Posts |
Quote:
P.S. In the last 24 hours we certified well over 100 wavefront proofs, probably closer to 150. All done by a relatively small number of beta testers. Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2020-08-15 at 19:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17×487 Posts |
I've given up on ATH & Uncwilly's disappearing "99,0" for PRP-CF assignments. I tried to reproduce in 30.3 and 29.8 with an upgrade to 30.3. No luck. Code review -- no luck. Whatever the problem is/was, its subtle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
3×953 Posts |
Quote:
Thank you for your reply. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
3×7×17×31 Posts |
The problem only occurred on 1 of the 2 machines that I upgraded. And it was all in the Worker 2 queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
7,823 Posts |
I installed prime95 v30.3b2 on a new build with old components in an even older case I had gutted. Gave it some work to do while the Celeron1840 was not busy feeding gpus. Was surprised to see a 6GB system yield a stage-1-only P-1 run for M122582657, then the error message in the title, since I've run P-1 on 2GB elsewhere.
There was an m122582657 file remaining, which I moved to a large memory system for stage 2, which indicated it could do 480 relative primes in one pass. I then investigated further on the 6GB system. It turns out that in prime95, v30.3b2, fresh install on a newly built system, Options, Resource Limits, Advanced, Daytime and Nighttime P-1/ECM memory limits had defaulted to 0 GB. Other systems had had earlier versions of prime95 upgraded to v30.3b2 and probably already had enlarged P-1 memory limit values in prime.txt. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-08-17 at 17:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
23×71 Posts |
Feature request:
What do you think about an option for saving GMP-ECM stage 1 ECM files instead of a line to results.txt, e.g. in the form exponent_B1_sigma.ecm. That way, it would be a lot easier to automate starting stage 2. Another question: Could the ECM hook also be applied to P-1, please? |
|
|
|