mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-08-09, 07:10   #12
Ensigm
 
Aug 2020

2·3·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
False- if you know TF was done to 82 bits, you know to not bother with ECM at the 20-digit level, nor at the 25-digit level. Skip right to T30 (B1=25e4).

Similar conclusions can be made about TF to, say, 79 bits- that rules out factors under 24 digits, so I would run less of a T25 and jump to T30-sized curves sooner. In B1 terms, less than a full set of curves at 5e4 and jump to B1=25e4 sooner.

However, it's rather unlikely to have a candidate number that one would TF to 78+ bits *and* consider ECM on. For the size of number for which we ECM, trial-factoring limits are usually 74 bits or lower and starting at B1=5e4 makes sense. So, in practice for GIMPS-factoring, TF doesn't influence our ECM choices.

That's exactly what I mean, although your words are clearer.
Ensigm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trial factoring limits TriV Factoring 7 2018-05-30 16:22
Trial Factor Assignment Time Limits Judge Hale Information & Answers 12 2015-07-11 23:48
Factoring/P-1 Benefit question JuanTutors Software 4 2010-11-17 08:34
Result Queries - Factoring Limits S485122 PrimeNet 0 2009-03-10 07:01
trial factoring and P-1 jocelynl Math 8 2006-02-01 14:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:22.


Fri Jul 16 18:22:48 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 16:10, 1 user, load averages: 2.91, 2.69, 2.31

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.