![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2018
2×5×53 Posts |
559=6^3+7^3 is the sum of two consecutive cubes
Is 559 (after 344) the smallest number k such that k is the sum of two positive cubes and k congruent to 0 mod 43? Are there any other k congruent to 0 mod 43 and sum of two positive cubes? Last fiddled with by enzocreti on 2020-02-13 at 18:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
9,787 Posts |
Who cares?
Why might this not be significant? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jan 2017
3·11 Posts |
x^3+y^3=(x+y)(x^2-xy+y^2), so yes there are infinitely many numbers x and y such that x+y is divisible by 43, and thus x^3+y^3 as well by association.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
7^3+6^3=559
7^3-6^3=127 a Mersenne prime. Are there other Mersenne primes which are the difference of two positive cubes? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jan 2017
3×11 Posts |
x^3-y^3=(x-y)(x^2+xy+y^2), so if x-y=1, then y=x-1 and the quadratic becomes x^2+x(x+-1)+(x-1)^2=x^2+x^2-x+x^2-2x+1=3x^2-3x+1, so if 3x^2-3x+1 is a Mersenne prime, then x^3-y^3 is also a Mersenne prime. Mersenne primes are always of the form 3n+1, so:
2^n-1=3x^2-3x+1 2^n-2=3x^2-3x (2^n-2)/3=x^2-x x^2-x-(2^n-2)/3=0 So, using the quadratic formula, if (-1)^2-4(1)(-(2^n-2)/3)=1+4(2^n-2)/3 with n a Mersenne prime exponent is a perfect square, then there is another Mersenne prime that is the difference of 2 cubes. This may seriously be one thing Enzo said that could turn into a legitimately difficult mathematical conjecture: Are there any more perfect squares of the form 1+4(2^n-2)/3? Also, trivially, 7. Last fiddled with by NHoodMath on 2020-02-13 at 22:24 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
Quote:
![]() And don't forget to keep us informed of the progress. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2020-02-14 at 05:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
(In context, OEISA181123) Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|