![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
Is 2^10283794-1||2^10283793-1 probable prime? where || denotes concatenation base 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22×1,549 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
110438 Posts |
I have no idea how far you have checked for possible small prime factors p. For this purpose, one could of course use the expression
10^3095731*(2^10283794 - 1) + 2^10283793 - 1 which can be easily reduced modulo p. If p is really small, it might also be worth reducing the exponents modulo p - 1. That's it for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
yes, it is probable prime with a probability between zero and one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
B5916 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
Pfgw is running with -f100
9000000/65000000 the progress not yet found a factor... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Mar 2018
2×5×53 Posts |
now i am running a prp test...in 50 days i will finish
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
trial division -f100 with Pfgw says that there is no small factor.
What does it mean? The number has no "small" factor below? (10^8, 10^9,10^10)? THE NUMBER IS NOT PRP!!! Last fiddled with by enzocreti on 2019-10-28 at 10:08 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Probable prime with more than 400k digits | enzocreti | enzocreti | 2 | 2019-02-10 16:17 |
| THE LARGEST TWIN [PROBABLE] PRIME | enzocreti | enzocreti | 2 | 2019-02-05 02:20 |
| probable largest prime. | sudaprime | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2018-02-05 08:10 |
| Fourth probable prime found, one to go! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 22 | 2010-01-01 00:23 |
| Megadigit probable prime found, our third! | philmoore | Five or Bust - The Dual Sierpinski Problem | 25 | 2009-09-09 06:48 |