![]() |
|
|
#298 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
45418 Posts |
I did a search for "24036583" on Yahoo and Google, and nothing relevant came up. Yet.
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×23×107 Posts |
I tried: new prime largest found -- Not much. Although Wilipedia has it in the article on primes already. Leave it to the open source folks....
|
|
|
|
|
#300 |
|
Aug 2002
22×5×13 Posts |
I have updated the New to GIMPS? Start here! thread with new information in connection with M41. I would like to get some feedback on the thread, suggestions for additions, corrections, extranous info etc.
Keep in mind that the thread is meant for possible new recruits to GIMPS, and as such should entice people to start with GIMPS. PM |
|
|
|
|
#301 | |
|
Aug 2002
22×5×13 Posts |
Quote:
), the common site for all Ars Technica Distributed Computing teams PM PS: The article is an unadaulturated pimpage for Team Prime Rib
Last fiddled with by Prime Monster on 2004-05-29 at 22:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#302 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22·23·107 Posts |
Wikipedia
|
|
|
|
|
#303 |
|
May 2004
Vancouver, Canada
22·52 Posts |
I was looking on the Guinness World Records site (http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/) today, and I noticed that SETI is in there for the largest computation... Have we beat that yet/already? They say it is 890 billion billion floating point operations. I don't know how that compares to teraflops :P
Also, why not contact them to include the largest known prime number? They just might print it in the book... Millions will be reading it...
|
|
|
|
|
#304 | |
|
Aug 2002
22·5·13 Posts |
Quote:
PM |
|
|
|
|
|
#305 | |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
Quote:
) is a measure of how many computations have been done, not a measure of how fast they are being done. But to put that into perspective, it would take about 2.17 years, running at 13 Teraflops, to reach that number of computations.Anyway, according to http://mersenne.org/ips/stats.html: "Between 23 November 1997 and 26 May 2004, PrimeNet has handled 4,223,723,933 P90 machine-hours (481,830 P90 machine-years) of Mersenne number tests." This gives a total of about 5.0*10^20. However, that is an underestimate, because it doesn't take into account all the computations that GIMPS made before November 23, 1997 and doesn't take into account results that were not reported via Primenet. Still, I doubt that these two factors would be enough to bring the total up to 8.9*10^20. |
|
|
|
|
|
#306 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
74 Posts |
A 890 million teraflop supercomputer would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
#307 | |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2·3·293 Posts |
Quote:
Anyway, I've just looked up the most up-to-date statistics on SETI, and it seems that they've gone WAY beyond 8.9*10^20 computations. That record was as of July, 2001. Today, SETI has exceeded 5.0*10^21 computations. Their speed over the last 24 hours is 72.266 Teraflops, over 5.3 times faster than Primenet. Furthermore, they have about half a million users who have returned at least one result in the last 4 weeks. Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2004-05-30 at 01:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
#308 | ||
|
Aug 2003
1100002 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When will the first 10 million digit prime be reported? | Uncwilly | Lounge | 13 | 2009-07-22 13:56 |
| 47th Mersenne prime reported! | ixfd64 | Lounge | 1 | 2009-06-10 16:14 |
| 41st Mersenne Prime found? | Unregistered | Data | 4 | 2004-05-21 10:08 |
| 41st Mersenne Prime Found??? | Prime95 | Lounge | 52 | 2004-03-23 20:06 |
| 40th Known Mersenne Prime Reported!! | Citrix | Lounge | 28 | 2003-12-21 19:42 |