![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
11001010110012 Posts |
On my PC in the beginning the iteration time was 0.055 but, I don't understand why, the iteration time rise to 0.155.
Maurizio |
|
|
#2 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
3·7·17·31 Posts |
Have you logged in and out different users on the machine with out shutting down? I have had this cause it to slow down on an NT machine. Also check and see what else is running, maybe something new is running.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Oct 2003
Australia, Brisbane
7268 Posts |
Have a look in your task manager and see what is taking up the cpu time. Also, just to make sure, these times were both with the same exponent? A higher exponent in a different fft range could account for the time difference per iteration.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
Luigi |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
32×1,049 Posts |
Quote:
I check on the task manager and prime 95 had a cpu usage of more than 95%. thank you for your reply maurizio |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
657710 Posts |
Quote:
thank you maurizio |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
2×5×163 Posts |
Quote:
The iteration time was increased while performing the test of one exponent thank you maurizio |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
3×7×17×31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
100100001012 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Dec 2003
Paisley Park & Neverland
5·37 Posts |
Maybe 0.055 was during factoring or P-1...
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Oct 2003
Australia, Brisbane
47010 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Per iteration time | Jwb52z | PrimeNet | 6 | 2011-09-09 04:06 |
| Time per iteration | em99010pepe | Riesel Prime Search | 7 | 2007-08-30 08:54 |
| WHAT IS PER ITERATION TIME? | MavsFan | Software | 1 | 2003-12-12 02:35 |
| iteration time log | crash893 | Software | 1 | 2002-11-13 05:45 |
| Per iteration time | sofII | Software | 8 | 2002-09-07 01:51 |