processed dc and tc posts

[kruoli]

Originally Posted by GP2

They will show up as assigned to -Anonymous-, but will be transferred to your user id once your system reports the assignment.

Have you seen the note?

[ATH]

Originally Posted by kruoli

Have you seen the note?

No, I obviously missed it, thanks.

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by ATH

No, I obviously missed it, thanks.

I enhanced it to make it more obvious.

[Uncwilly]

I just want thank James and Aaron for hooking me up with the special report for the TC's and now a new one for those with 1 LL and 1 PRP.

It was some hand work getting the lists synced up and dealing with the 0 shifts, etc., but it is worth it.

[Zhangrc]

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Lists updated New Cat 1's.

If you are doing PRP's as DC's to LL's please use software that generates Certs/proofs.

I doubt that some people did use the proof generation software (GPUowl) but forgot (or didn't know how) to upload them, or they just deleted them because the files took up too much space with almost random data.

[techn1ciaN]

Suggestion: A "shift 0 / don't use GPUOwl" sub-category might also be added for the TC-LL lists. I'm running my LL TCs in GPUOwl 6.11 and had neglected to notice that M59864977, which I reserved earlier, had one of its two original tests done with shift 0. This would have made my TC worthless if that test's res64 had been the matching one. (I've moved the work line and will test that exponent with Prime95 instead.) I quickly reviewed the TCs I've completed recently and noticed that this also could have happened with M61422019 (thankfully, my test matched the shift > 0 res64 in actuality).

[Uncwilly]

Yeah, more work for me. I will look at doing it.

[techn1ciaN]

Originally Posted by techn1ciaN

I'll also pick up the full-length DC on those exponents once I turn the TF in.

NF for

PRP=1,2,59516879,-1
PRP=1,2,59625113,-1
PRP=1,2,59635679,-1
PRP=1,2,60800659,-1

I've started PRP-DC, but PrimeNet rejected Prime95's attempts to register the lines (I tried both PRP= and PRPDC= formats). I'll proceed anyway and assume the exponents won't get poached.

I notice that all of the exponents I checked out for TF were taken off the lists and realize that the last sentence in my original post could have been clearer. I will only run the full DC for the four exponents above (for the time being); the rest are still up for anyone once I get done with the TF. I apologize for the confusion if there was any.

Edited: I changed one of the lines into LL DC to see if I could get an AID that way (and then change it back for the actual test), but the registration attempt was still rejected ("redundant LL effort"; the rejection reason for the PRP registration attempts was "violates assignment rules").

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by techn1ciaN

I notice that all of the exponents I checked out for TF were taken off the lists and realize that the last sentence in my original post could have been clearer. I will only run the full DC for the four exponents above (for the time being); the rest are still up for anyone once I get done with the TF. I apologize for the confusion if there was any.

Once you get the TF work done on them they will show back up on the list. The query that I use for the list will catch them as they cease to be currently assigned.

[sdbardwick]

Originally Posted by ChZ

Requesting LL triple-check:

DoubleCheck=62267897,76,1

Completed; matched ChZ's result.

[techn1ciaN]

TFing

PRP=1,2,60822823,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=60822823,74,1
PRP=1,2,61458619,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61458619,74,1
PRP=1,2,61478467,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61478467,74,1
PRP=1,2,61497461,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61497461,74,1
PRP=1,2,61516327,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61516327,74,1
PRP=1,2,61525799,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61525799,74,1
PRP=1,2,61535381,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61535381,74,1
PRP=1,2,61559387,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61559387,74,1
PRP=1,2,61576649,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61576649,74,1
PRP=1,2,61724279,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61724279,74,1
PRP=1,2,61761137,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61761137,74,1
PRP=1,2,61763263,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61763263,74,1
PRP=1,2,61822429,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61822429,74,1
PRP=1,2,61883989,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=61883989,74,1
PRP=1,2,62095669,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62095669,74,1
PRP=1,2,62168443,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62168443,74,1
PRP=1,2,62168459,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62168459,74,1
PRP=1,2,62287237,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62287237,74,1
PRP=1,2,62287279,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62287279,74,1
PRP=1,2,62287319,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62287319,74,1
PRP=1,2,62287343,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=62287343,74,1
PRP=1,2,63244417,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=63244417,74,1
PRP=1,2,64196413,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=64196413,74,1
PRP=1,2,63847171,-1   OR   DoubleCheck=63847171,74,1
DoubleCheck=60038659,74,1
DoubleCheck=60151753,74,1  <-Caution has a zero shift result

to 75 bits. ETA 48 hours or less. Same problem as before; I couldn't get factoring AIDs for any of the 1 LL + 1 PRP exponents, so I'll just start those right away and try to turn the results in promptly.