processed dc and tc posts

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by kriesel

quad check requested on 64387151
DoubleCheck=64387151,74,1

Aaron beat me to it.

[kriesel]

My residue on 64387151 is definitely suspect, since I had multiple occurrences like the following in that LL run. Another in the past 9 also was bad. Oddly though, this same GPU had done a 100Mdigit LLDC successfully a few months earlier. I may be doing less LL, more PRP/proof as DC on it in the future.

2021-10-27 20:20:30 asr2/radeonvii2-w2 GPU -> Host read #0 failed (check ffe9faf0 vs ff45192b)
2021-10-27 20:20:30 asr2/radeonvii2-w2 GPU -> Host read #1 failed (check ffe9faf0 vs ff45192b)
2021-10-27 20:20:30 asr2/radeonvii2-w2 GPU -> Host read #2 failed (check ffe9faf0 vs ff45192b)
2021-10-27 20:20:30 asr2/radeonvii2-w2 Exiting because "GPU -> Host persistent read errors"
2021-10-27 20:20:30 asr2/radeonvii2-w2 Bye

[kriesel]

Took:
PRP=1,2,91484321,-1
PRP=1,2,92065123,-1
PRP=1,2,92717773,-1
CERT=000000000000000000000000069B6561,1,2,110847329,-1,6927959

[richs]

May I please have a triple check on 59711849 https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...9711849&full=1? Thanks!

Nevermind, I see in the processed thread that kriesel has already picked this one up.

[Luminescence]

Picked up:

DoubleCheck=61851079,74,1

[techn1ciaN]

Claimed:

DoubleCheck=59799491,74,1
DoubleCheck=61303951,76,1

ETA less predictable since the machine I'm running these on apparently qualifies for certs now. Optimistically still inside of a week.

Also, tried to claim

DoubleCheck=59773471,74,1

but it's been in progress by Madpoo since Oct. 30. Should probably be taken off the list.

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by techn1ciaN

DoubleCheck=59773471,74,1

but it's been in progress by Madpoo since Oct. 30. Should probably be taken off the list.

Often times he just starts them without visiting this thread. Having direct access to the server does have its privileges. (And he did complete the assignment.)

[Uncwilly]

List is updated. I stole the new Cat 1 before posting the updated list.

[Jan S]

I grabbed these:

PRP=1,2,104887217,-1
PRP=1,2,104910683,-1
PRP=1,2,104923369,-1
PRP=1,2,104945317,-1
PRP=1,2,104946407,-1
PRP=1,2,104950837,-1
PRP=1,2,104969833,-1
PRP=1,2,104972081,-1
PRP=1,2,105813439,-1
PRP=1,2,105895879,-1

But something is wrong: I choose "double-check using PRP with proof"(manual assigment), all exponents are "Cat 0" and i have only 7 days to go. :-(

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by Jan S

But something is wrong: I choose "double-check using PRP with proof"(manual assigment), all exponents are "Cat 0" and i have only 7 days to go. :-(

This is a known issue. All PRP is treated as if it is a FTC, with regards to assignment Cat. So even the PRP-CF assignments get treated as Cat 0. That needs tp get fixed on the server.

[techn1ciaN]

Originally Posted by Jan S

But something is wrong: I choose "double-check using PRP with proof"(manual assigment), all exponents are "Cat 0" and i have only 7 days to go. :-(

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

This is a known issue. All PRP is treated as if it is a FTC, with regards to assignment Cat. So even the PRP-CF assignments get treated as Cat 0.

To be clear, the problem is strictly in reporting. The exponents will not be unreserved. You can see the real expiry date(s) if you go to "Extensions" under the Manual Testing tab.