20190306, 21:10  #1 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10010110100110_{2} Posts 
Strategic double and triple checks (PRP's and P1's too)
New sticky to house the lists. Post requests for DC and TC's and claim of exponents. The mods will keep the lists maintained in the top posts. Post with requests for rechecks and exponents claimed will be removed when the lists are updated.
Always register your claims right away. Those that are claimed but not registered will remain on the lists. If they are listed as being assigned to Anonymous (or others not known to be finishers) and show no progress, they will be moved to the watch list section. The lists are kept fairly up to date. The easy way to get some assignments (with Prime95):
Instructions for mprime:
For gpu runs, see https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...4&postcount=21 and follow links it contains as needed. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20200916 at 21:52 Reason: tweaked wording. 
20190306, 21:11  #2 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·61·79 Posts 
Strategic LL Double Checks
Any exponent that has had a single First Time LL should no longer have an LL DC. It should get a PRP on a machine running Prime95 v30+ or GpuOWL v 6.11318+ that produces VDF (proof files). The extra effort to run the certification from the proof files vs the need for TC tips the balance in favour of the PRP (with the better error checking code.) Code:
. Code:
. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20210314 at 18:14 Reason: Updated wording based upon Ken's input. 
20190306, 21:12  #3 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×61×79 Posts 
LL Triple Checks
This is for the list of needed triple (and higher order) checks.
Code:
Exponents with 2 Unverified results: Cat 0 Cat 1 DoubleCheck=57826103,74,1 DoubleCheck=57836777,74,1 Cat 2 DoubleCheck=58311263,74,1 DoubleCheck=59221147,74,1 DoubleCheck=59297701,76,1 DoubleCheck=59298739,76,1 DoubleCheck=59338571,76,1 DoubleCheck=59368093,76,1 DoubleCheck=59390533,76,1 DoubleCheck=59413279,77,1 DoubleCheck=59537801,74,1 DoubleCheck=59546833,74,1 DoubleCheck=59391023,76,1 DoubleCheck=59392153,76,1 DoubleCheck=59556163,76,1 DoubleCheck=59557859,76,1 DoubleCheck=59957203,76,1 DoubleCheck=60131171,76,1 DoubleCheck=60131359,76,1 DoubleCheck=60131861,76,1 DoubleCheck=60264619,76,1 DoubleCheck=60313327,76,1 DoubleCheck=60540443,76,1 DoubleCheck=60540563,76,1 DoubleCheck=60576839,76,1 DoubleCheck=60576877,76,1 DoubleCheck=60646529,76,1 DoubleCheck=60898163,76,1 DoubleCheck=60935087,76,1 Cat 3 DoubleCheck=61375607,76,1 DoubleCheck=61380283,74,1 DoubleCheck=61423807,76,1 DoubleCheck=61510651,76,1 DoubleCheck=61510817,76,1 DoubleCheck=61510819,76,1 DoubleCheck=61586423,76,1 DoubleCheck=61699577,76,1 DoubleCheck=61861621,76,1 DoubleCheck=61915351,74,1 DoubleCheck=61916089,74,1 DoubleCheck=61920709,76,1 DoubleCheck=62058329,76,1 DoubleCheck=62109881,76,1 DoubleCheck=62409251,74,1 DoubleCheck=62438687,76,1 DoubleCheck=62442703,75,1 DoubleCheck=62498213,75,1 DoubleCheck=62513537,75,1 DoubleCheck=62513551,75,1 DoubleCheck=62641847,75,1 DoubleCheck=62880703,75,1 DoubleCheck=62987609,75,1 Higher level DoubleCheck=63446561,74,1 DoubleCheck=64120391,74,1 Exponents with 1 Suspect result + 1 Unverified result: DoubleCheck=60404411,75,1 DoubleCheck=60541933,76,1 DoubleCheck=61500661,76,1 DoubleCheck=62172353,74,1 DoubleCheck=64215961,74,1 DoubleCheck=64740971,74,1 PRP=1,2,107793883,1 PRP=1,2,332340061,1 These >100M should probably be done with PRP + CERT: PRP=1,2,102164971,1 PRP=1,2,102436709,1 PRP=1,2,102437149,1 PRP=1,2,102982241,1 PRP=1,2,103898761,1 PRP=1,2,103927337,1 PRP=1,2,103956971,1 PRP=1,2,103963411,1 PRP=1,2,103965809,1 PRP=1,2,103986007,1 PRP=1,2,104000179,1 PRP=1,2,104887217,1 PRP=1,2,104910683,1 PRP=1,2,104923369,1 PRP=1,2,104945317,1 PRP=1,2,104946407,1 PRP=1,2,104950837,1 PRP=1,2,104969833,1 PRP=1,2,104972081,1 PRP=1,2,105813439,1 PRP=1,2,105895879,1 PRP=1,2,105970699,1 PRP=1,2,106269629,1 PRP=1,2,106281101,1 PRP=1,2,106436579,1 PRP=1,2,106757293,1 PRP=1,2,106850251,1 PRP=1,2,106877807,1 PRP=1,2,106899941,1 PRP=1,2,106916981,1 PRP=1,2,106917269,1 PRP=1,2,106922617,1 PRP=1,2,106931621,1 PRP=1,2,106938773,1 PRP=1,2,106957313,1 PRP=1,2,106969703,1 PRP=1,2,107506727,1 PRP=1,2,107709193,1 PRP=1,2,107766973,1 PRP=1,2,107791967,1 PRP=1,2,107803733,1 PRP=1,2,107825119,1 PRP=1,2,107855149,1 PRP=1,2,107863681,1 PRP=1,2,107863979,1 PRP=1,2,107874667,1 PRP=1,2,107933101,1 PRP=1,2,107958733,1 PRP=1,2,108918889,1 PRP=1,2,108920951,1 PRP=1,2,108921503,1 PRP=1,2,108924821,1 PRP=1,2,108935221,1 PRP=1,2,108955879,1 PRP=1,2,109889981,1 PRP=1,2,109937459,1 PRP=1,2,109943221,1 PRP=1,2,109956577,1 PRP=1,2,109985783,1 PRP=1,2,110223551,1 PRP=1,2,110970257,1 PRP=1,2,332242501,1 PRP=1,2,340705633,1 . Code:
Exponents with 1 LL + 1 PRP result: PRP=1,2,91312313,1 OR DoubleCheck=91312313,76,1 PRP=1,2,91345361,1 OR DoubleCheck=91345361,76,1 PRP=1,2,91484321,1 OR DoubleCheck=91484321,76,1 PRP=1,2,92065123,1 OR DoubleCheck=92065123,76,1 PRP=1,2,92717773,1 OR DoubleCheck=92717773,76,1 PRP=1,2,93018301,1 OR DoubleCheck=93018301,76,1 PRP=1,2,93030583,1 OR DoubleCheck=93030583,76,1 PRP=1,2,93103291,1 OR DoubleCheck=93103291,76,1 PRP=1,2,93218179,1 OR DoubleCheck=93218179,76,1 PRP=1,2,93506051,1 OR DoubleCheck=93506051,76,1 PRP=1,2,94016093,1 OR DoubleCheck=94016093,76,1 PRP=1,2,94339633,1 OR DoubleCheck=94339633,76,1 PRP=1,2,94339633,1 OR DoubleCheck=94339633,76,1 PRP=1,2,95018947,1 OR DoubleCheck=95018947,76,1 PRP=1,2,95031437,1 OR DoubleCheck=95031437,76,1 PRP=1,2,95052863,1 OR DoubleCheck=95052863,76,1 PRP=1,2,96019657,1 OR DoubleCheck=96019657,76,1 PRP=1,2,97630829,1 OR DoubleCheck=97630829,76,1 PRP=1,2,97991869,1 OR DoubleCheck=97991869,76,1 PRP=1,2,97998083,1 OR DoubleCheck=97998083,76,1 PRP=1,2,98542219,1 OR DoubleCheck=98542219,76,1 PRP=1,2,98922557,1 OR DoubleCheck=98922557,76,1 PRP=1,2,99368989,1 OR DoubleCheck=99368989,76,1 PRP=1,2,99908087,1 OR DoubleCheck=99908087,76,1 PRP=1,2,99908141,1 OR DoubleCheck=99908141,76,1 PRP=1,2,99947567,1 OR DoubleCheck=99947567,76,1 PRP=1,2,100006129,1 OR DoubleCheck=100006129,76,1 PRP=1,2,101938999,1 OR DoubleCheck=101938999,76,1 PRP=1,2,101943377,1 OR DoubleCheck=101943377,76,1 PRP=1,2,102923921,1 OR DoubleCheck=102923921,76,1 PRP=1,2,107867267,1 OR DoubleCheck=107867267,76,1 PRP=1,2,107867719,1 OR DoubleCheck=107867719,76,1 PRP=1,2,107951563,1 OR DoubleCheck=107951563,76,1 PRP=1,2,108926743,1 OR DoubleCheck=108926743,76,1 NOT gpuowl (shift 0) unless recent version with proof file generation: DoubleCheck=87868147,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,87868147,1 DoubleCheck=87868367,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,87868367,1 DoubleCheck=88779043,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,88779043,1 DoubleCheck=88934981,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,88934981,1 DoubleCheck=89999477,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,89999477,1 DoubleCheck=91351061,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91351061,1 DoubleCheck=91385527,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91385527,1 DoubleCheck=91480981,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91480981,1 DoubleCheck=91499503,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91499503,1 DoubleCheck=91558253,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91558253,1 DoubleCheck=91593347,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91593347,1 DoubleCheck=91733827,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91733827,1 DoubleCheck=91769203,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91769203,1 DoubleCheck=91774363,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,91774363,1 DoubleCheck=93385927,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,93385927,1 DoubleCheck=94754279,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,94754279,1 DoubleCheck=99009619,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,99009619,1 DoubleCheck=99051361,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,99051361,1 DoubleCheck=99869039,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,99869039,1 DoubleCheck=99957023,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,99957023,1 DoubleCheck=102589933,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,102589933,1 DoubleCheck=104829037,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,104829037,1 DoubleCheck=105956441,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,105956441,1 DoubleCheck=106869773,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,106869773,1 DoubleCheck=106870273,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,106870273,1 DoubleCheck=106972771,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,106972771,1 DoubleCheck=106973701,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,106973701,1 DoubleCheck=106984529,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,106984529,1 DoubleCheck=106984613,76,1 OR PRP=1,2,106984613,1 PRP=1,2,90200717,1 (2 PRP results with shift 0) . Code:
PRP=1,2,332250197,1 (3 nonmatching LL's 1 of which is suspect.) . Code:
. Last fiddled with by ATH on 20210613 at 19:04 Reason: Ken got a couple of exponents. 
20190327, 20:13  #4 
Sep 2003
2^{3}·17·19 Posts 
PRP double and triple checks
PRP checks. Note: please use V30 for these.
Code:
. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20200803 at 00:57 Reason: Mike is endless 
20190905, 21:15  #5 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
9638_{10} Posts 
Potentially bad P1 results that need to be redone
Potentially bad P1 results that need to be redone.
Place holder post. There are ~50 P1 tests that might be bad. If Madpoo provides the list it will go here: Code:
. [uncwilly] @ewmayer: Can't find Aaron's post at the moment. The forum search does not accept P1 as a keyword. Look at the original date on this post and check for Aaron's post 0>30 days before. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20200305 at 08:36 
20200119, 11:27  #6  
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2·1,571 Posts 
Quote:
Added the 2 extra arguments that can be in the assignment: ",3,1" 1,2,96365519,1: Number to test: 1 * 2^{96365519}  1 76: Trial factored to 2^{76} 0: Not sure about this one. (Maybe if P1 has been done or not? or how many PRP tests has already been done on the exponent?) [EWM comment: Per the assignmentformat examples on my Mlucas readme page, a 1 following the TF bit depth means this expo has had some p1 testing done but could use a deeper round of p1; thus a 0 presumably means no deeper p1 is warranted.] 3: PRP base 3. This is always 3 as standard for normal GIMPS candidates. 1: PRP type 1. This can vary between 15, but mostly 1 or 4 for older gpuowl tests. Prime95 and newer gpuowl versions and Mlucas? default to type 1 (and Prime95 uses type 5 for PRPCF tests on exponents with known factor(s)). Both PRP base and PRP type has to be the same for the PRPDC test as the original PRP test. PRP type from undoc.txt, the "(default is 5)" is only for PRPCF tests, the type number is 1 on normal PRP tests. Code:
PRP supports 5 types of residues for compatibility with other PRP programs. If a is the PRP base and N is the number being tested, then the residue types are: 1 = 64bit residue of a^(N1), a traditional Fermat PRP test used by most other programs 2 = 64bit residue of a^((N1)/2) 3 = 64bit residue of a^(N+1), only available if b=2 4 = 64bit residue of a^((N+1)/2), only available if b=2 5 = 64bit residue of a^(N*known_factors1), same as type 1 if there are no known factors To control which residue type is generated, use this setting in prime.txt: PRPResidueType=n (default is 5) The residue type can also be set for PRP tests in worktodo.txt entries making this option somewhat obsolete. And also for base >3, some versions of gpuowl, PRP res type 0. Gpuowl supported PRP res type was 1 for some versions, 4 for others, 1 currently. Worktodo formats for all common applications are described in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...8&postcount=22 Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 20200712 at 23:37 Reason: Added clarification re. the "more p1 needed?" field in PRPDC assignments 

20200731, 16:40  #7 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22646_{8} Posts 
DC's on suspect single LL's should no longer be done.
Any single suspect LL should be redone with v30 as PRPVDF. The balance between the DC and higher than usual TC rate vs running a fresh a PRP & cert lean toward the PRP path to require fewer cycles long term. The error checking is better on PRP. TCLLs still make sense to clean up as LL (the required quad rate is low enough). 
20210611, 19:32  #8 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10010110100110_{2} Posts 
A new quad check of a 332M exponent is needed (or a PRP on it). 1 LL is suspect, the other 2 are not.
List is up to date. 
20210611, 20:30  #9 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
5233_{10} Posts 
FWIW (not much), the 0shift LL run on M332250197 had no Jacobi check errors indicated in the gpuowl.log. I'd like to see a matching LL on this one to help define 100Mdigit LL error rate better. But it is a substantial effort at ~4950. GHD.
Took: Cat 1 DoubleCheck=57106099,74,1 DoubleCheck=57974659,74,1 ETA within a week barring system or power issues. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20210611 at 20:31 
20210611, 21:18  #10  
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
10010110100110_{2} Posts 
Quote:
[When I looked up the details on this machine on PrimeNet to post it I found out it (and another borg) had 8 cores vs the 6 I thought. I changed the settings and am now employing all 8 of those.] Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 20210611 at 21:27 

20210611, 22:06  #11 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
5,233 Posts 
30 TF from 78 to 81 bits at 100Mdigit? Or 30 P1 to adequate bounds?
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 20210611 at 22:28 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Strategic Double Clicking  Madpoo  Marin's Mersennearies  1841  20190716 03:30 
PRP triple checks?  GP2  Marin's Mersennearies  4  20190316 15:31 
How often are triple checks released?  patrik  Data  5  20040131 22:19 
How do I get rid of the Triple Checks??  outlnder  Lounge  4  20030407 18:06 
Triple Checks How are they disposed of??  outlnder  Lounge  6  20030124 22:01 