![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
Mar 2003
34 Posts |
A 3000 digit long prime number is not a problem at all =))).
My comp has worked half an hour and gave me the following 10240-bit long primes: 0835h*2^10228 + 1 355Fh*2^10226 + 1 48F9h*2^10225 + 1 6E21h*2^10225 + 1 CC1Fh*2^10224 + 1 And of course, my prog is several times slower than others and does not use a sieve, just brute division with very slow DIV instruction =))) |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Mar 2004
29 Posts |
Quote:
Why do you mix hex and decimal, btw? What was the largest prime you found? And sorry if it bores you, but I still would like to know what machine you are using. I guess the hex number is a prime,, right? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing | Trilo | Miscellaneous Math | 25 | 2018-03-11 23:20 |
| Double check LL test faster than first run test | lidocorc | Software | 3 | 2008-12-03 15:12 |
| Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? | swinster | Software | 2 | 2007-12-01 17:54 |
| A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2004-10-26 21:37 |
| performance of primalty check methods | juergen | Math | 2 | 2004-03-31 21:19 |