![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
3×5×137 Posts |
I just finished watching an episode of "The Nature of Things" about the construction of the Egyptian Pyramids on CBC.
It stated that the large blocks of stone were carried along rails and probably using rollers. As a mechanical designer this does not quite make sense to me. What does, is what I read years ago that it was probably done by adding 4 semi circular wooden blocks to the sides of a rectangular block, which resulted in forming a large circular profile. Such an assembly would be capable of rolling over obstacles as high as the radius of the formed circle. That would be a much simpler/intuitive/practical method of transporting large blocks than pulling rectangular blocks along wooden rails. Any thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷ð’€"
May 2003
Down not across
29·3·7 Posts |
Quote:
Another thought is that the constructed rollers will still only be twice the diameter of the tree trunks from which they were made. An advantage, yes, but a large enough one? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
22×733 Posts |
I like this theory: https://imgur.com/gallery/HJ9ll
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
3·5·137 Posts |
Quote:
Those are very good points, you can watch the episode online here http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/m/e...f-the-pyramids It is known that the blocks were carried on wooden ships held together using ropes, The same engineering that kept the ships together and from crushing would make the wooden blocks feasible. Pyramid builders riotous have certainly been capable of building blocks bigger than the tree trunks they were made of the same way a ship is much larger than the diameter of a tree outs made of. Ancient Egyptians were much more advanced than one might expect of people some 5k years ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
103×113 Posts |
With the pyramids, rolling over obstacles or even minor unevenness would not be an issue, since so many blocks went into each pyramid that it would be imperative to properly construct a "road" from the quarry to the pyramid. Wooden rails+rollers would be an excellent way to accomplish this, and would save all the unnecessary labor and block-tipping-on-its-side needed by the giant-wheel approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
100101100010102 Posts |
What's funny in all this topic is that your link is shortened by the forum's software into "f-the-pyramids"
to which I agree...Too much ink was already wasted in things which for me seem not mysterious at all.... People then, like now, were not stupid... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2017-11-02 at 15:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
3×5×137 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Odd perfect related road blocks II | jchein1 | Factoring | 632 | 2011-11-14 15:14 |
| Odd perfect related road blocks | jchein1 | Factoring | 31 | 2009-04-29 15:18 |
| Question about triming [code] blocks | schickel | Forum Feedback | 4 | 2009-04-01 03:27 |
| MonoDevelop vs. Code::Blocks | ixfd64 | Software | 1 | 2008-03-10 08:30 |
| Pick a stone, or two, .... or three | Wacky | Puzzles | 5 | 2003-06-24 16:11 |