![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Aug 2002
2×29 Posts |
Well I've been Googling and searching here for it for half an hour and I still can't find it. What is the FFT size for the current M332 exponents? I'm guessing it's about 17920k but I want to benchmark the correct size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
9,787 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
61278 Posts |
CUDALucas also says 18432K (18M).
Prime95 says it is near the border between 17920K and 18432K but the round off error was too high to use 17920K. Edit: Round off error was too high to use 17920K. Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-09-04 at 11:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Aug 2002
728 Posts |
Great, thank you both. At 18432K it looks like it would take about 61 days on the Xeon I have. Tempting, though I might wait for when it's not 100 degrees in my office.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how to submit manually a job with exponent 100M which is done by mfaktc? | fairsky | Information & Answers | 17 | 2013-09-16 19:49 |
| GHz days v exponent size | davieddy | Information & Answers | 9 | 2011-07-16 20:50 |
| What minimum exponent would give 100M digit prime? | odin | Software | 7 | 2010-04-18 13:57 |
| 100M exponent idea | MrOzzy | Information & Answers | 40 | 2008-11-12 10:19 |
| Exponent Size Gap | Mini-Geek | PrimeNet | 8 | 2007-03-25 07:29 |