![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×3×1,223 Posts |
I've decided to extend this OEIS sequence, which is also known as an Alternating Factorial. I wrote a custom sieve and a pfgw script to process the output file from the sieve. I intend to sieve and test to n = 100000. Like factorials, this form removes a smaller percentage of candidates than other forms. I have sieved to 4e10 and 44% of the original terms still remain. Sieving at this time has a removal rate of about one-fifth what it needs to be in order to sieve to an appropriate depth.
My program can be easily modified to support this sequence, also known as a Factorial Sum. If anyone is interested in taking on such a search, please let me know and I'll cook up some software for you. Last fiddled with by rogue on 2017-07-15 at 02:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
281D16 Posts |
You must have meant A001272 not A005165.
The beauty of this sequence is that it has the maximum. (because it is finite) If you sieve up to n=3612701 (instead of 100,000) then you "will sieve them all"! All of similar sequences are likely to be finite. For example: A063833 :: !n - 3 is prime; it is finite (and complete in its present form) because for all n >= 467, 467 | !n - 3. Extensions: A001272(24) = 43592, Jul 19 2017 A100614(20) = 41532, Jul 22 2017 A100289(19) = 32841, Jul 29 2017 Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2017-07-30 at 03:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×3×1,223 Posts |
Fixed the link. I'll let someone else sieve to the limit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
162528 Posts |
I wrote an OpenCL version of the sieving code. It is 20x faster than the assembler code in my other sieve. That makes the decision to switch a no-brainer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sep 2013
23·7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×3×1,223 Posts |
I hadn't thought about it, but that is a possibility.
BTW, due to differences in how the sieves work, the non-GPU code is slower with smaller p than the GPU code. The actual rate is about 12x faster. Last fiddled with by rogue on 2017-07-18 at 18:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
240358 Posts |
I searched a little bit with a simplistic sieve and found 43592.
I am now searching for the extension of the half-left-factorials: http://oeis.org/A100614 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
733810 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Oct 2015
19 Posts |
https://oeis.org/A100289
Numbers n such that (1!)^2 + (2!)^2 + (3!)^2 +...+ (n!)^2 is prime. a(19) = 32841 from Serge Batalov, Jul 29 2017 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fulsorials | a1call | Miscellaneous Math | 46 | 2020-08-03 00:31 |
| Offset of primes from factorials | Lee Yiyuan | Miscellaneous Math | 10 | 2012-08-28 19:15 |
| Gay Marriage: weekly alternating viewpoints | Brian-E | Soap Box | 46 | 2008-11-09 22:21 |