mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-03-18, 20:35   #1
nfortino
 
nfortino's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

3×5×11 Posts
Default Tracking the November 2003 release of error-prone exponents

Here is the status of the November release of 1144 error-prone exponents originaly metioned in this thread. http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1381

1144 exponents were released

1095 of these had been tested once and needed a 2nd test:
785 had a harmless error code, but were returned by error prone machines
310 had a harmful error code.

49 exponents were tested twice and needed a 3rd test (both
original tests were by error-prone machines or had a harmful error code).

The status as of 2004-Mar-18 20:00 UTC:


Of the 49 (out of 1144) exponents released for a 3rd test
(because both original tests were error-prone),
18 are still pending,
1 needs a quintuple check,
3 need quadruple checks,
3 have expired and not been reassigned,
24 now have two matching results.

3 of these 24 have only good results,
21 of these 24 have results known to be bad.

The fraction of exponents in which both of the original tests are bad is
(assuming the original tests are at fault for mismatches) (1+3)/(1+3+24)=.143
Since the criterion for finding these exponents was an expected error rate of
.333 per test, this is about in-line with the expected .111

Of the 785 (out of 1144) exponents which had been released for a second test,
261 are still pending,
8 have been factored,
2 have apparently expired and not been reassigned,
4 have very recently cleared,
441 have been confirmed good,
and the remaining 69 have erroneous results.
Of these 69,
2 have two good results and one bad result,
67 still require a triple check.

This is an error rate of 69/(69+441)=.135,
far below the 0.333 error rate which was the criterion for detecting
error prone machines.


Finally, of the 310 (out of 1144) exponents released for a second check due to
harmfull error codes,
131 are still pending,
0 have been factored,
1 was recently cleared,
41 are now confirmed good,
the remaining 137 have erroneous results.
Of the 137,
2 have two good results and one bad result,
134 now need a triple check,
1 now needs a quadruple check.

This is an error rate of (1+136)/(1+136+41)=.770

More detail in the attached file:
Attached Files
File Type: zip November_batch_status_31804.zip (36.0 KB, 237 views)
nfortino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-08-12, 23:15   #2
nfortino
 
nfortino's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

A516 Posts
Default

The status as of 2004-Aug-12 22:00 UTC:

Of the 49 (out of 1144) exponents released for a 3rd test
(because both original tests were error-prone),
5 are still pending,
1 has a quadruple check on primenet,
1 needs a quintuple check,
3 need a quadruple check,
1 has apparently expired and not been reassigned,
7 have three matching results,
31 have two good results and one bad result.

Of the 785 (out of 1144) exponents which had been released for a second test,
61 are still pending,
8 have been factored,
3 have apparently expired and not been reassigned,
6 have very recently cleared,
612 have been confirmed good,
and the remaining 95 have erroneous results.
Of these 95,
10 have two good results and one bad result,
7 have a triple check on primenet,
1 needs a quadruple check,
77 still require a triple check.

This is an error rate of 95/(95+612)=.134,
far below the 0.333 error rate which was the criterion for detecting
error prone machines.

Finally, of the 310 (out of 1144) exponents released for a second check due to
harmfull error codes,
49 are still pending,
0 have been factored,
3 have recently cleared,
64 are now confirmed good,
the remaining 194 have erroneous results.
Of the 194,
3 have two good results and one bad result,
5 have a triple check on primenet,
1 needs a quintuple check,
5 need a quadruple check,
180 need a triple check.

This is an error rate of 194/(194+64)=.752

More detail in the attached file:
Attached Files
File Type: zip November_batch_status_081204.zip (42.7 KB, 211 views)
nfortino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-07-25, 13:46   #3
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22×691 Posts
Default

Another update for those who are interested. Again I have not bothered to differentiate between exponents released for a second test and those released for a third test.

Of the 1144 exponents which had been released for a second test,
24 are still pending,
8 have been factored,

753 have been confirmed good,

and the remaining 393 have erroneous results.
Of these 393,
84 have two good results and one bad result,
3 have two good and two bad results,
1 has two good and three bad results.

271 still require a triple check or more.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tracking the October 2003 release of error-prone-machine exponents GP2 Data 10 2005-07-25 13:14
2003 Nov 03: P-1: a set of 30 exponents GP2 Completed Missions 3 2003-11-17 15:09
2003-10-29: P-1: a set of 26 larger exponents GP2 Completed Missions 3 2003-11-12 14:16
2003 Oct 31: P-1: a set of 17 larger exponents GP2 Completed Missions 2 2003-11-03 15:34
107 stuck exponents at 20.8M as of Oct 24 2003 GP2 Data 1 2003-10-24 21:32

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:07.

Tue Jun 15 17:07:03 UTC 2021 up 18 days, 14:54, 1 user, load averages: 1.98, 2.07, 1.95

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.