![]() |
|
|
#2531 | |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
3·5·41 Posts |
Quote:
It is marked as a suspect result and based on the second CERT run from George, it did not succeed at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2532 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
5·11·137 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2533 |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
60710 Posts |
A first draft of the 77936867 top list for OpenOffice Calc. Does not contain macros. Presorted according to (µs / it). Unfortunately, I only have 15 values for now. So I'm happy about every halfway useful gpuowl-benchmark. Just post in this thread or via PM to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2534 | |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
607 Posts |
Quote:
Maybe something is still possible with the RTX 3090? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2535 | |
|
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017
3·52·11 Posts |
Quote:
That said maybe not, 1.77 TFLOPS of SP in an iGPU is nice but DP may be omitted altogether ( https://www.sisoftware.co.uk/tag/1165g7/ ). It's promising for intel's dGPU line at least that their iGPU is so performant in SP, but how the power draw compares to AMD's Vega iGPUs and how performance/watt compares to the upcoming RDNA2 iGPUs is unknown. I wouldn't mind intel's consumer Xe (there are many Xe variants in the works apparently) omitting DP entirely if it means they can produce an SP monster. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2536 |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
60710 Posts |
Sure, but since it won't be able to keep up with most of the current dGPU's, I thought of a separate benchmark list.
This card f.e. have 4,113 TLOPS FP32 (SP) and 0,137 TLOPS FP64 (DP) Code:
2020-10-24 15:45:24 Tesla K80-0 OpenCL compilation in 2.80 s 2020-10-24 15:45:25 Tesla K80-0 77936867 OK 0 loaded: blockSize 100, 0000000000000003 2020-10-24 15:45:25 Tesla K80-0 validating proof residues for power 8 2020-10-24 15:45:25 Tesla K80-0 Proof using power 8 2020-10-24 15:45:26 Tesla K80-0 77936867 OK 200 0.00%; 2778 us/it; ETA 2d 12:09; 2619e0f0cb78fe50 (check 0.40s) 2020-10-24 15:55:02 Tesla K80-0 77936867 OK 200000 0.26%; 2883 us/it; ETA 2d 14:15; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 0.42s) 2020-10-24 16:04:39 Tesla K80-0 77936867 OK 400000 0.51%; 2884 us/it; ETA 2d 14:07; c03f94396a5aa29e (check 0.41s) 2020-10-24 16:14:16 Tesla K80-0 77936867 OK 600000 0.77%; 2883 us/it; ETA 2d 13:56; b9decd65ca71b629 (check 0.42s) Last fiddled with by moebius on 2020-10-24 at 16:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2537 | |
|
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
10000012 Posts |
See below results for a P4000 Mobile version v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2538 | |
|
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
5×13 Posts |
And results for a GTX 1080 Mobile (@ 1695 Mhz) :
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2539 |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
11378 Posts |
Product Name GPU Chip Released Bus Memory GPU clock Memory clock Shaders / TMUs / ROPs
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q GP104 Jun 27th, 2017 PCIe 3.0 x16 8 GB, GDDR5X, 256 bit 1290 MHz 1251 MHz 2560 / 160 / 64 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q GP104B Jun 27th, 2017 PCIe 3.0 x16 8 GB, GDDR5X, 256 bit 1290 MHz 1251 MHz 2560 / 160 / 64 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile GP104B Aug 15th, 2016 PCIe 3.0 x16 8 GB, GDDR5X, 256 bit 1582 MHz 1251 MHz 2560 / 160 / 64 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile GP104 Aug 15th, 2016 PCIe 3.0 x16 8 GB, GDDR5X, 256 bit 1556 MHz 1251 MHz 2560 / 160 / 64 Please enter the exact chipset and product name. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2540 | |
|
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
4116 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2541 |
|
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
5·13 Posts |
And the GPU-Z attach for the P4000 :
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mfakto: an OpenCL program for Mersenne prefactoring | Bdot | GPU Computing | 1676 | 2021-06-30 21:23 |
| GPUOWL AMD Windows OpenCL issues | xx005fs | GpuOwl | 0 | 2019-07-26 21:37 |
| Testing an expression for primality | 1260 | Software | 17 | 2015-08-28 01:35 |
| Testing Mersenne cofactors for primality? | CRGreathouse | Computer Science & Computational Number Theory | 18 | 2013-06-08 19:12 |
| Primality-testing program with multiple types of moduli (PFGW-related) | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2006-10-04 22:38 |