mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-03-11, 04:31   #1
SpecTheIntro
 
Mar 2004

610 Posts
Default Please help--hardware problems.

I'm running the following machine:
P4 2.4C at stock speed
ASUS P4P800 Deluxe (865P chipset)
1 GIG OCZ PC3700 Gold Rev.2 Matched Pair (Running at PC3200 settings 2-2-3-5)

I cannot get the blend test to pass--it crashes under 10 minutes every time I run it. It first crashed around 2 weeks ago, and to follow it up I ran memtest and discovered errors in my RAM. (I used to have Corsair XMS PC3200 1GB Matched Pair) I sent that back and purchased the OCZ. As soon as I got the OCZ, I underclocked it to PC3200 and set it 2-2-3-5. (The settings OCZ recommends.) I then ran memtest86 for exactly one full cycle (running all tests, not std, for ~1 and a half hours) and received no errors. I ran it again to make sure and got the same results. The other two Prime95 tests both return successful first rounds. I plan on running each overnight to see if either fails, but here's my question:

I know Large FFT tests CPU and Blend tests memory--why would Large FFT pass the first round of tests, and Blend fail? The memory isn't bad; I've tested it repeatedly in memtest and no problems pop up. Any suggestions? I monitored my temps and the hottest the P4 ever got on the Blend was 96 Fahrenheit. (39 C) What else could Blend be testing? My chipset temps are constant too. (Never going higher than 33 C) Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!!
SpecTheIntro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-11, 06:45   #2
SpecTheIntro
 
Mar 2004

2·3 Posts
Default

Update:

After running the Large FFT test for 1 hour and 33 minutes, it failed:

[Wed Mar 10 22:53:44 2004]
Self-test 8K passed!
[Wed Mar 10 23:22:55 2004]
Self-test 1024K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 00:20:32 2004]
Self-test 1024K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 00:36:57 2004]
Self-test 896K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 00:53:16 2004]
Self-test 768K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 01:09:45 2004]
Self-test 640K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 01:26:08 2004]
Self-test 512K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 01:37:08 2004]
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4
Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file.

Checking my history file, the temperature at the failure was 41C on the CPU. What does this mean? Do I have a bad CPU?
SpecTheIntro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-11, 10:08   #3
markr
 
markr's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney

3·191 Posts
Default

What version of prime95 are you using? (Assuming it is prime95.) Version 23.7 had a bug in the torture test that apparently was triggered in very occasional, specific circumstances. 23.8 is the latest, I think.

Your temperatures seem fine to me, but my experience is limited.
markr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-11, 13:46   #4
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

752610 Posts
Default

Try memory settings that are slower than 2-2-3-5
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-11, 19:39   #5
SpecTheIntro
 
Mar 2004

2·3 Posts
Default

I'm running 23.8.1. (It's Prime95.)

Ok, so I tried running it at timings 2-3-3-6 and it still failed in 6 minutes. (Citing a rounding error.)

I tried running at 3-4-4-8 and it froze before completing the first test. (under 5 minutes)

I'm so confused. Why would memtest pass this memory without fail after an hour and a half of continuous stress testing, but Prime95's Blend test crashes within 10 minutes? Do you think it could be my chipset drivers? I'm using the latest 865 drivers from Intel.

Is there any good program to JUST test the CPU? The fact that I failed Large FFT in an hour and a half makes me suspect that the CPU is the culprit, but the fact that I froze after relaxing the memory timings makes me suspect something else may be up.

Ugh. I'm not even overclocking. What a crappy situation.

Thanks for all your help, and please keep suggestions coming!
SpecTheIntro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-11, 20:40   #6
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

2×53×71 Posts
Default

It could be the CPU - try upping the core voltage. Also, make sure your voltages are OK. An inadequate power supply could be the cause.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-12, 00:21   #7
QuintLeo
 
QuintLeo's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Lost in the hills of Iowa

26×7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95
It could be the CPU - try upping the core voltage. Also, make sure your voltages are OK. An inadequate power supply could be the cause.
It's not overheat - 41C is plenty cool for a P4.

I'd suspect RAM or motherboard, *if* it's not the power supply. More likely the motherboard, since you've already replaced the RAM once and are underclocking the new RAM.

Could be the CPU, but I've not seen a lot of failures out of P4s that aren't overclocked.
QuintLeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-12, 04:00   #8
SpecTheIntro
 
Mar 2004

2·3 Posts
Default

[Thu Mar 11 20:39:31 2004]
Self-test 1024K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 20:56:12 2004]
Self-test 8K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 21:11:58 2004]
Self-test 10K passed!
[Thu Mar 11 21:26:24 2004]
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than 0.4
Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file.

This is the longest I have EVER gone on Blend without an error. The only thing I changed, hardware wise, was the voltage: from 1.525 to 1.5375. Also, I realized I'd never disabled Norton Antivirus while running Prime95, so I did that as well. I'm really not sure which could have caused the increased longevity. I used MBM to monitor the readings on my mobo and here are the extremes during the stress-testing:

Case: 91 F
CPU: 105 F
CPU voltage: 1.49v (absolute lowest) 1.52 (average)

I have some fans plugged into the headers on my mobo, and I'm going to switch them over to the 3.3V rail to see if that helps motherboard stability at all.

All of my other voltages were stable. Is there any way I can stress-test my chipset, so I can narrow it down between it and the CPU?

Thanks again for all of your help!

Last fiddled with by SpecTheIntro on 2004-03-12 at 04:02
SpecTheIntro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-17, 11:59   #9
Mutu
 
Feb 2004

2 Posts
Default

Try 2.5-4-4-8 memory timings.
Mutu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-17, 13:25   #10
QuintLeo
 
QuintLeo's Avatar
 
Oct 2002
Lost in the hills of Iowa

26·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecTheIntro
[Thu Mar 11 20:39:31 2004]

I have some fans plugged into the headers on my mobo, and I'm going to switch them over to the 3.3V rail to see if that helps motherboard stability at all.

It won't - PC fans, for the most part, are designed to run from 12VDC and most won't spin at ALL at less than about 6 volts.

Plug them into a 12V line from a spare HD connector instead.
QuintLeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-19, 06:18   #11
SpecTheIntro
 
Mar 2004

2×3 Posts
Default

Ok, I replaced the mobo, which is why I hadn't posted for a while.

I think that fixed the problem. I ran the Blend stress test for 3 and a half hours with no problems at all. However, just a few minutes ago my computer randomly shut down. My temps weren't out of the ordinary, so I think that may have been a software fluke. Anyhow, I'm going to run Prime95 overnight and see if I can eke out an error. If not, I'm going to assume that my hardware issues are over.

Thanks a bunch for your help, everyone!
SpecTheIntro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PC problems Nimras Information & Answers 6 2009-12-15 21:24
Need help with few problems Laserjet Hardware 1 2007-10-13 10:59
Two problems gribozavr Puzzles 11 2007-02-05 05:46
Weird Game and Prime 95 problems, may it be Hardware? Arthanis Hardware 30 2005-01-07 11:16
Q: Mlucas on Linux on Alpha hardware - Problems ??? MartinHvidberg Mlucas 9 2003-07-21 18:58

All times are UTC. The time now is 06:15.


Sat Jul 17 06:15:16 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 4:02, 1 user, load averages: 1.31, 1.22, 1.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.