![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"144"
Mar 2017
144
3 Posts |
I have read about Bounds, but it's too advanced for me, and I'm not sure how to scale Bounds to the exponent.
The Optimal Bounds I got auto assigned when I requested a P-1 test for M332255197 are B1=4660000 and B2=4660000 (same). I have i5-6600k cpu and 16GB ram if it's important. And what is the number right for "Number to " in P-1 settings. If you could, explain in general terms, I don't even have an intermediate understanding of these numbers and terms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"144"
Mar 2017
144
3 Posts |
I changed the max memory in settings to 8192 day and 10240 night and get B1=3070000, B2=85192500 bounds now (posting this here since I can't edit my first post).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
23×3×72 Posts |
The second stage (B2) requires more memory than stage 1 (B1) to run efficient. If you dont allocate enough memory it will only run stage 1 (B1=B2).
Prime95 calculates bounds before starting the assignment. Taking in consideration the amount of Trial Factoring done and the chance of finding a factor (thus saving 2 LL test). Bounds can change depending on the processor and/or architecture. Usually giving Prime95 1GB+ should allow it to run a decent stage 2. You can also use the maxhighmemoryworkers setting to allow only 1 or 2 stage 2 runs at the same time, so you can still use the machine for other things (or run them at night when you're not using the machine). Edit: You do realise 100milion digit numbers (332M) are not for the faint hearted? Its your choice what to do with your computing power/electricity, but people sometimes dont realise how big/long those assignments can be. Nothing wrong with P-1 at the current wavefront (80M).. Last fiddled with by VictordeHolland on 2017-03-04 at 18:22 Reason: 100M digit? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"144"
Mar 2017
144
3 Posts |
Thanks. I guess I'll use suggested Bounds for now. I do have about 10GB available at any time, so I hope it will get utilized.
I have 2 tests running at a time, so setting "MaxHighMemWorkers" to 1 could be useful. Yeah, I started realizing that 100m digit LL tests are not something I will undertake (estimated ~550 days on my CPU), only maybe if I can get it to work on my RX 480 AMD GPU (not sure it's supported (only mfakto supports AMD atm?)). Last fiddled with by 144 on 2017-03-05 at 23:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2·5·312 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2017-03-06 at 05:46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus
17810 Posts |
hmmm, weird. Regarding to your CPU LL test must be take ~120 days.
Last fiddled with by Lorenzo on 2017-03-15 at 13:37 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Extending P-1 Bounds | TObject | Software | 4 | 2012-10-10 17:42 |
| ECM bounds | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2011-07-17 20:18 |
| unusually low P-1 bounds | ixfd64 | PrimeNet | 9 | 2011-04-02 18:45 |
| Bounds explanation | Uncwilly | Lounge | 4 | 2011-04-01 19:15 |
| Factors bounds | jtavares | Factoring | 5 | 2004-11-28 09:46 |