Except for the last page, the previous thread became a bit long.

[storflyt32]

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001098585460

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001096588724

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001114089727

Starting a new one, because here cleaning most of the kitchen, and also the fridge, which ended up with a stuck door at the end, needing a kitchen chair in front.

Better get rid of it, because of the Easter, and the fact that I could spend a bit of time in here right now.

Adding the third link above a short while ago, because here a quite good example of a leftover factorization, where two big lions ate much of the beef, except for any cake either,
for that of the complexity involved here.

Have a look at this example and you possibly will agree with this assumption.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001115762816

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001115763205

And next, "curious electric", for something I did not like that well.

P2 = 13 and P3 = 113 and next a C51, if not wrong, which needs the separate window for the rest, or three P17 factors.

But also a P11 and P17 in the first output, and here not having the specific P17.

Thinking only of the C51, and also the rest, the two factors becomes forgotten, and I have to rewind back when almost halfway finished.

When such a thing happens, not that fun, but only shows that factors sometimes does not go in the correct order.

Here from an Arithmetic Progression (AP20) being found, and for this also expecting it smooth along the whole way.

Becomes the wrong way, because a C506 will not any more at first, and next also a P286, which better should have been made first.


And here adding a bit more of contents, but the tick was not set for that of the login once again, and I lost the whole posting, which is a bit of shame.

Better do the weekend shopping anyway, and perhaps something found in a local temp directory when returning back.

Before doing so, I also watched the "Numberphile" video as well, and becomes also such a thing for that of a "shot in the dark", next for that of numbers.

Having a bit of fun a couple of days ago, next a PRP1087 being stored away, but for now apparently no "sieving factors" either, except for any reporting.

More important, making the "Set on pause when CPU use from other programs exceeds" still at 100%, but rather changing from 25% to 100% for CPU,
when still only 25% for CPU time, apparently made for more tasks running, but here still only one GPU task, while not the other (two graphics cards),

Only for that of still one thing for another here, and therefore not the time having a bit of fun, next when on BOINC Manager 7.8.3

We also could be having a discussion about sieving priorities a couple of places, except for not any broken parts or results either, but except for perhaps Yafu as a project itself,
most likely that there is no specific way of finding any Mersenne factors either, in a similar way.

This because I rather could be left reporting a couple of PRP's instead, like the mentioned PRP1087.

Now I am in a bit of hurry for that of the shop.

For now, only the bottle of milk standing on the table, but next also a couple of ideas while doing the needed things.

A couple of privacy messages for that of not beiing logged in at Google either, but clicking on the sound icon at lower right, I get the playback module for that of devices.

A double outlet on the top of the computer, a headphone set is being confused with microphones, only for that of lying around.

But next when clicking on each speaker for that of 5:1, no sound, but choosing 7:1, it becomes a little or perhaps small noise, and next pressing OK after sensing that it could be so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYQeYF3zfts

Here for a bit of science, like also another one as well, but here both Internet Explorer, Google Chrome and also Mozilla Firefox, while also Microsoft Edge hiding in the shadows.

The post that vanished had a bit more to say, but for now not getting Yafu at running, using the options available.

The disk being used for this also was the one which also broke, with the end result that there could be much found, but next also in only bits and pieces.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001117182569

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001117182625

Am I right or am I wrong, because here a red star for new factors being added, and this time composite only.

Here I was thinking of using FDB with the "*" or multiplication symbol, assuming that the factors were readily known.

Becomes like that of a homework lesson for such, except for perhaps forgetting the whole thing, except for this page when using Mozilla Firefox, and the factors when using Chrome.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001117183321

Storing temporary here, because need to revert back to Windows 7 here, and next that the factors ended up in the Temp directory on the Windows 10 partition.

Possibly Yafu-x64 could break this number up in the previous two on the spot, leaving only the remaining factors.

P64 = 4650384055791287715318612314019533732871786340821784227432051601

P64 = 5985308577876124650278825351417108648386073995987866741912341909

P64 = 7213820902434963364151186560559158420921586339845038328468305677

That above for my notes only, and the first factor above should be a common factor for both here for that of multiplication purposes only, because this could also be proprietary works of sorts, and next not mine.

But also that it could be having a practical applicability for perhaps a common sense as well, and while I do not have PSP/ESP/SoB Jade either for that of any CPU sieving, it is perhaps more of a mishap when it
next could all go down the drain because of a lost or missing server.

Here that of "trip trap" for such a thing, and next also 2 versus 3, like also 2 versus 5, or 3 versus 5, in that 5 DIV 2 should return 2, like also 5 DIV 3.

But next, the difference, by means of subtraction, should be 1 versus 2, if not any 3 either.

Or perhaps rather it should be 1.5 (or 1,5 if you will), 2.5, or 1.6666.... for next that of a division itself.

This because the new "magic number" here, perhaps could be something like 1.3063778838630806904686144926026... or so, and again the broken disk for also what Numberphile had to say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%...tient_function

Here first when keying in using the Wikipedia, but next not what I want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%...eroni_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mills%27_constant

Should be here for that of the latter, because here noticing the number 2521008887 a little down, and next what I also want.

Keying in the larger numbers manually, and storing with the constant after a bit of double checking.

16022236204009818131831320183

4113101149215104800030529537915953170486139623539759933135949994882770404074832568499

It became the sound right now, but also that I want Yafu still running, because for now making it 13063778838630806904686144926026 (integer number).

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001117194550

Here better the P29 first, if not the bad disk, because here also being added, and next any P30^n-1, or even P30^n+1, for that of n=243, or the like, could make for quite a big task.

Trying a restart of Windows 7 in the meantime, for the rest of it, and also the weekend beer, while also noticing that 7*7 makes for 49 at the end, and therefore no point of adding or subtracting 1.

Only the rest of the sausage, before perhaps the dinner, but here P29 = 16022236204009818131831320183, and rather want to have 16022236204009818131831320183 * 725765491035044828038119162557 here.


2
11
1361
2521008887
16022236204009818131831320183
4113101149215104800030529537915953170486139623539759933135949994882770404074832568499


2
7
337
38272739
56062005704198360319209
176199995814327287356671209104585864397055039072110696028654438846269

Did not catch the second part here at first, but the Wikipedia made it graphics only here, so also here updating with the correct numbers.

Got Windows 10 updated in the background, so trying a restart, before perhaps ending up with Windows 7 later.


And started up here, and next lost the tab, thanks to Internet Explorer.


Should better be Google Chrome here, but next the garbled tab for that of startup.



Too small font here right now.





Too small font here right now.





Too snall font here right now.


Pressing DELETE (and not DEL) on a blank line, next nothing happens, except for (?)
or a written line itself, next at the end.


Here killing off a triple or so blank line, next from above, or perhaps bottom, and next nothing happens.


Blane my keyboard perhaps.



It really should not be about any BOLD, or text formatting either, because checking this as well, both at top, and also in the middle, and next that the text is too small.

The tab in the browser closed down on ne, so here not liking the small font in the browser.


Keying in "font" using CTRL-F3 (search or text search) and next no result.



Mentioning this at BOINC rather, in all respect.



And you already know that I am back at using Internet Explorer 11 here, and except for the small font, and also typo as well, apparently is working a bit better when using Google Chrome.



Keying in "end", next also "sequence", and here I will have to go for it manually, in order to get it fixed, because here it does not take carriage return either.


Pressing both the DELETE and DEL keys, for also that of two carriage returns at the start, or beginning, and definitely something is wrong here, and perhaps not my keyboard either.


Back later.


Better pick Edit, rather than Quick Reply here.


So, apparemtly for no reason, yet anither two week vacation from Seti@home here.


Cbeccking, one link for thaat of the Scientific Method, and next no much more.


Nezt I do not any numbers either when at 1 PM, and also a couple of beers.


But next perhaps not the main reason either, because a possible way of belief, could be that of Idealism.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idealism


So, why not any Celibacy either, because perhaps even better?


Should it rather be Formalism here, and next once sciece for or versus another, next also for that of brand?


I mentioned that of the spoken word in the past, and next also that of being heard.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause_(disambiguation)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause_(logic)


Getting the middle page or link being such a disambiguation, or page, but if next "speaking of", what next?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method


For this, of course or eventually making it a Cause here, like Causality, except not any Santa Claus either.


Back later.

[storflyt32]

What ugly in the previous, but have replaced the power supply and am almost back at full when it comes to that of running the tasks.

The new power supply makes a whining sound, but next the only one I have.

Left stuck with a Windows 10 which I do not like, for now still unable to boot from the CD/DVD for Windows 7, because of a hardware failure, and doing it by means of software apparently is unsuccessful.

So here that above one of my priorities, while the other is that of factoring.

I am not able to get Yafu working under Windows 10.

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=21802

Reading above, and both pages, did not gave much of an answer either, in my case.

For now in a hurry for that of the shop, but at least I still know to type.

Something else posted in between, and next it perhaps disappeared, or vanished.

Posting using my my account at Seti@home, next a single character in a word getting wrong, and they did not like that, and I am once again on a 14 day vacation.

Or perhaps tomorrow, for that matter, because here that error, of course, except for not doing such a thing as factoring, of course.

Hey, wake up, because this is really matter for that of truth here, because right now i am unable to do such a thing, for that of Windows 10.

If not here (dear or honest me, perhaps also PrimeGrid as well), where I also could be having the message through, or perhaps heard.

You versus me, and next also a bit of welcome here as well, because here appreciate the gratitude, and next also welcome, for next also a bit of message as well,
and a couple of things next being heard, or perhaps welcome.

Some good news to add here, in that it does not take the Yafu application when using the DOS prompt, but if I key in 'yafu-win32 "2*3" ' , it outputs the result in the usual fashion.

For this, take these two factors as an example:

P83 = 16559819925107279963180573885975861071762981898238616724384425798932514688349020287

P94 = 2353359030226356478476118041850820087557640143190392467802488431466759331102236967432080003389

The first one at the top of the list for the largest ecm factors, while the second from an output in my own list.

Next multiply these two factors for that of a composite number.

Next the flip-around for that of the magic number, and it also takes division ("/") from the command line as well.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123435250

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123435761

Also noticing that Microsoft Edge will not do the copy and paste here for that of the FDB, so reverting back to Internet Explorer 11 for this.

If rather a little more eager, I could take one of the P154 factors from my list, and do the same flip-around, because I thought the P94 was already known.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123443712

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123444094

Here perhaps both wrong order, and also the same for the factors as well, but I could also continue keying in the P154 factors I already have, for that of the different factors at the other end.

Switching back to Internet Explorer and now not the F5 refresh button for that of the page in the browser, which is not always needed, but at least when adding new factors, and next updating.

Two more multiplications this time, and I could add the links after the dinner, but here perhaps once again in the wrong order for that of adding the factors.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123468222

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123468835

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123472014

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123472656

Still the dinner remaining, but here that the two pairs above should have been in opposite order.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123603226

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001123594084


And here finishing off for today, because here you may have some fun when it also becomes a factor at the other end, when multiplying together, and next "dividing" as usual.

But also that it becomes a P113 directly on the spot, so here a semi-prime candidate this time for the number in question.

Not keyed in yet for that of the latter, but will be doing so before getting too late, at 05:45 AM in the morning.

[storflyt32]

C83 = 22534087081034095052066506243696987390513132899975285634635494732817980429568208549

Came across this number early today, and keying in as well in the correct place.


Now only the small posting window, when making a new post, so here slightly more difficult.

Flipping around for a C147 in question, and here a P38 on the other side, which became reported.

But more interesting is that it is having a better one from the magic number, by means of P1 = 3, P3 = 157, and two P11 factors, and next a P201, but also that it still took almost 90 seconds here.

I will have it later, because 08:23 AM in the morning is not the best of times.

Also that it becomes two blank lines each time as well, which I will next edit away.


Another one I have for you, and it could be a quite difficult one.


C78 = 336455089680269817916058271611206361737473363890319941104184544745832810563817


Flips around for a prime factor the opposite way quite easy, but not keyed in yet where it should be.

Guessing here that it could be close to that of a RSA-256 when it comes to syntax, or perhaps difficulty.

You are welcome to giving it a try, but again not easy here, as far as I am able to tell.



http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001131360582


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001131359550


But next keying in the wrong order, only showing that it would be better to have the factors of all numbers less than 100 digits being stored.


Here a P143 in between, and I could have it after the dinner.


Not the best looking text, but also sad to say that perhaps there may not be any secret with that of numbers anymore, because here it readily breaks in successive order,
for mostly everything, except for a couple of few.

Again not working for the mouse and keyboard, so the rest will have to wait.

Ending up in a C213, for next that of a P20 and P26 being added, and I happen to know about that above.

Not pretty, but perhaps more spectacular, or important, is that we still do not know.

Here the question for you, namely do I need a larger number for that of a factorization itself, or is it "implied" in the number itseff,
by means of factors being possible?

I found not everything working here, because of also two dogs having the same meal, and next competing as well.

RSA numbers are supposed to be "remainders" of sorts, and next a P60 * P60 for such an example.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001132172707

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001132171859


Same as usual, or at least latter, but is it not so that it could be still a couple of things remaining?

Flipping the order of the links above, and next a bit of difficulty, using the editor.

Again, well aware of that above, but also that here it became a P345 in my list.

Only small factors preceding it, so here perhaps a quite good candidate.

Also in my notes is a quite long one, where the end result is quite good for that of the "Magic number", and here almost there again.

But not reported yet, because of the bad mouse and keyboard, if not my fingers.

My apologies again for not letting it look any pretty, because of the mentioned problem, but also that it broke here, for that of RSA factoring,
and the ways and means for which it could be done.

Here a P150 added to my list only moments ago, and next for numbers less than just 300 digits or so, and I had a P213 a little back as well.

Knowing the way it could be done, also that it also might be possible as well, but it still could take some time.


So what does it mean when you could have a pair of P61 and P66 factors, for next that of a P17 and a P160 at the other end?


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001137028244

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001039473839


Here probably individual factors for the first one, while adding the second a short while ago.

Total factoring time = 72896.2110 seconds



C:\Users\>yafu-x64 "factor(23319796715986892305955165085546797547803938090128690071906519086021720031799303570230525694815223215887638494943463584295602161)"


fac: factoring 23319796715986892305955165085546797547803938090128690071906519086021720031799303570230525694815223215887638494943463584295602161
fac: using pretesting plan: normal
fac: no tune info: using qs/gnfs crossover of 95 digits
div: primes less than 10000
fmt: 1000000 iterations
rho: x^2 + 3, starting 1000 iterations on C128
rho: x^2 + 2, starting 1000 iterations on C128
rho: x^2 + 1, starting 1000 iterations on C128
pm1: starting B1 = 150K, B2 = gmp-ecm default on C128
ecm: 30/30 curves on C128, B1=2K, B2=gmp-ecm default
ecm: 74/74 curves on C128, B1=11K, B2=gmp-ecm default
ecm: 214/214 curves on C128, B1=50K, B2=gmp-ecm default, ETA: 0 sec
pm1: starting B1 = 3750K, B2 = gmp-ecm default on C128
ecm: 430/430 curves on C128, B1=250K, B2=gmp-ecm default, ETA: 1 sec
pm1: starting B1 = 15M, B2 = gmp-ecm default on C128
ecm: 904/904 curves on C128, B1=1M, B2=gmp-ecm default, ETA: 4 sec
ecm: 363/1801 curves on C128, B1=3M, B2=gmp-ecm default, ETA: 4.96 hrs
Total factoring time = 8759.5283 seconds


***factors found***

P41 = 10902355485322532205808111781749783165429
P88 = 2138968661165152424445564189842425989543672533259027975240147136122977253372529164397709

ans = 1


Here I was wrong, and not too difficult here.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001137167792

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001137169487


While the first could be still in the blue for a question mark, you could try out with RSA-155 for the second, and only "unofficial" here, for that of a multiply this time,
in that factorizing such numbers could be very difficult indeed.

But adding a P161 a little earlier on, it could also be shown the way you could find these factors as well.

No point of wasting time on the C132 either, because this is quite a beast, and now a week into it by means of the SIQS.


Or maybe broken hearts of sorts, because here it became edited away.


Fools or horses, if perhaps not any horses either, and always a limit for that of saying, if perhaps not any free speech either.


Makes me think that "Determinism" is perhaps not any pussycat either, but rather slippery Sue, for that of a bit of stones,
next for also the edge, or maybe cliff, including that of both guesswork, and also knowledge.


Believe it or not, but if perhaps not any user perspective either, also that of certificates as well, during the week,
in the sense, or perhaps feeling that it could be broken.


Make it that of an Authority, next also an issuer as well, for that of a certificate, and next it could be RSA-2048 for such a thing,
in a sense that it perhaps may not be broken.


Make or break perhaps, and next also "crack" as well, except for perhaps not any Number crunching either.


If not wrong, Princess Leia once said "You did it", except for perhaps not me doing such a thing either.


Everyone here, or elsewhere, should be fully aware that such a number as RSA-2048 is purely a numerical issue, and therefore also subject to such a thing,
except for that of "make and break", or even crack, for such a thing.


Lile the novice for not fully understand, perhaps not always the teacher either.


Plot eh, except for not any Conspiracy either.


Make it rather fallback, and next also leads back to.


Dangit. but according to science, we could be some 0.84 on the Kardashev scale, except for someone else to compare with.


Hard to swallow, if not any bits or pieces either, next for both that of music, and also that of factors which next could also make it primes.


If I was a photographer, I could also end up in the lab, for next the details.


169!-1 or something and it has a P42 or so (needs checking).


So, why that of an almost endless loop, if you could make it almost a supercomputer on your own (read Pentium, or Pentium Pro, if not any factorization either).


Not meaning to be unfair either.

[storflyt32]

So, if sieving perhaps means one thing, next also perhaps the leftover, or still remainder.


There could be people around saying "enough", only because 2 could be the answer, except for perhaps not the rest.


Becomes a reminder (and not remainder) of a couple of questions being asked at PrimeGrid, and perhaps also Seti@home, for "welcome home", if perhaps not alone,
but rather that of sometimes "quantisizing" some, or a couple of numbers, rather than questioning their possible "authentictity", or genuineness, meaning fastness as well.


Always the signal in the sky, for that of possible aliens or extraterrestrials as well, but next that numbers always could be having their own purpose, for next also meaning.


Funny isn't it, but except for not having the details right now, Columbus set sail with some three ships, in order to discover the Americas, including Santa Maria, if not wrong.


But rather ending up here with the old face of someone else (and not Jesus, by the way).


Not Michelangelo, and perhaps not Christopher Columbus either, even in his old days, but next who is this man being portrayed?


A man and woman could sometimes be one, but next not by means of any stretched hands either, or even light white, for that of skin color.


Perhaps rather Leonardo da Vinci here, on his old days, or old age.


But rather sometimes cheating for my part, in that a C200 could be a pair of P100 factors, with still that little thing, or part remaining.


C96 = 315472218139293356013346563701835685831891933234030539640916120515888577183410357875741303070669


Tell me it is the easiest, or perhaps most important thing, except for not any security certificates, of course, or maybe the guess that we are not alone in space, only for such a thing.


Need to edit the number abovr, before finishing.


Here very many lines at first, by means of the factor command, as usual, but ending up in error, for that of the number above.


Perhaps splitting in two if getting any unnecessary lines, but checking in with the C96 after picking the first beer from the fridge.


Even on a thursday only, because here also listening in at Carl Sagan, for that of Humility, of sorts.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8GA2w-qrcg


Perhaps science, or rather it could be a bit of melancholy here.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melancholy


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melancholia


Perhaps a slight difference from that of Depression (of the mind), and also such a thing for that of being sober as well, if not any drunk.


Really on my mind is the fact that factoring perhaps does not fit any purpose, except for possibly, if not sometimes, a number for that of secrecy.


http://www.prothsearch.com/fermat.html


A little known P49 here, and again my apologies for making it the wrong forum, because you already know that I did not make it work here, for that of the rest.


P49 = 7751061099802522589358967058392886922693580423169


P54 = 116928085873074369829035993834596371340386703423373313


P54 = 568630647535356955169033410940867804839360742060818433


The Factor Database is having the factors here, next in pairs, meaning that two of these numbers have been factored from each other,
but apparently not all three at the same time, because of the complexity involved.


For now only a composite number for the product.


Here C156 = 515359473535768426658723565099800347160894830815839647142554433992375844759582146700437536322893018937902601839896287406932526109366225811049188594382438401


for the product, and next of interest, perhaps how this C156 relates to the "Magic number" (RSA-1024) doing it the other way.


It should be easier, or at least smaller factors, and next it should be on my disk as well, because I was working on it.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001146094665

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000937857195


Need checking if there could be more here, but the P30 in front makes it not that easy, and doing so, nothing more here.


Not readily factored here, but at least knowing it from a pure multiply point of view.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_depressive_disorder


Here for that of the last beer standing on the shelf, or desk.


But that is the finishing line above, because also two separate factorizations, each tight ones, like a P47 versus a P54,
both different for each of the factors, and making for quite a good sequence.


Also composite here as well, at last time checking, and if together with the Fermat factors above, makes for a quite good number.


I need go back looking for the numbers, but here the dinner became a bit late today, and I had to relax a little first.


I think I may get the point here, or maybe heard, even better at PrimeGrid, because you know that a C200 never factorizes into a P100, P100 pair, unless you know.


If perhaps rather still the RSA "algorithm" for such, still those numbers as also end factors, except for also composite, and the way it could be found.


Perhaps from an even larger number here, except for the partition for this blew, as you perhaps know.


Here a couple of examples, and please do not add for now, because this is also on my mind.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001145063626


So, no one shouting?


Adding here,, after lying dead for maybe two weeks or so.


Always that of prose, if not any prose or prosa either, but if perhaps counting a couple of sheep,
If not still "Oh, be a fine girl, kiss me now" (O B A F G K M N), next right now as well, and also that of PGP as a textual algorithm,
or perhaps representation, next for that of cryptologic purposes, and next I do not like it that much.


Mentioned before, but numbers could perhaps come clean by also being such, and next also being interpreted in that way as well.


For this, still "Wind him up, by Saga", for next that of a melody, if perhaps not any such thing as CXXX / PYYY for next an answer.


Only a C110 here, or C110 = 11736225585051074344123780071523689636028002733511392911984324592408313280663711860533667922836124171570704009


and next what is the answer?


Because here you still have the man, namely Michael Goetz, in charge of PrimeGrid, and I sent or made him congrats, for that of the SoB Jade badge.


But if still thinking that one number is perhaps larger than another, and next also more difficult, what about Prime Sierpinski versus Seventeen or Bust,
except for sometimes running blind for the whole thing?


Here running blind means that of meeting the dead end, or perhaps wall as well.


Except for being a little mean, or dishonest, also the fact that the flip-around side is not necessarily that easy either.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000937857195


Again, but I will not be running blind either, and next thinking in the same fashion all the time.


In my opinion, RSA, or a RSA number, is perhaps not about any "Standards" either.


But rather about secrecy for such a thing, so why not leave it next alone?


You perhaps know about the drone coming close on a bear close to a catch on its own, and next its eyes, when being caught, or stumbled upon.


If still numbers for next that of numbers, if not any face either, or even something else, which I should not mention,
perhaps still that of nature for such a thing, and next that of a facet as well.


Using Google Translate on the word, and perhaps no such thing as a face at all.


Adding factors for that of a number, and the rest could still be open, if perhaps not a bit more or better known.


Perhaps "Never say never", could also mean forever, if not any James Bond, except for those numbers which we try to factorize and get a hand across.


So, if perhaps not any Sherlock Holmes either, or even a woman sewing her own shoes, if not curtains, also that of footsteps, for sometimes stepping back,
if not doing so for any time either.


Really, as previously mentioned, a C200 factored into two P100 prime numbers or factors, is perhaps not any "best solution", or answer either,
except for still the RSA algorithm at hand, for next such a thing.


Is a number cruncher of sorts (next a user, and not a computer as such) next also a detective, in that an answer may perhaps be found?


Again what I said previously, or above for such a thing, namely meeting, or encountering the wall, for such a thing, if not getting across it either.


Surprise, surprise, again.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001146094665


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000937857195


If still that difficult the other way, does it perhaps tell about overall complexity of the number as a whole?


Or perhaps rather a "sneaky" preview, for almost being there?


For orders sake, only "loose factors" in the first one, but still "Never say never", because I do not think progress is getting nowhere, except for such.


If still that of blind, for next also blindness, you are welcome, except for that above.


If perhaps "Slippery Sue" is still such a thing, and next also a couple of factors the other, or yet another, you are welcome,
because at least you found those factors, except for not doing the big factorization, of course.


Ok, or anyway, so troll in a box, if not "Jake in the box" either, for next numbers also being symbolic, or perhaps representative for that of nature,
in the way, or perhaps context of making it only numbers for even such a thing.


Or perhaps a movie, for next that of crime, and here that of "Godfather", except for not such a thing as even numbers only part of a bigger whole.
and next at least the Universe for such a thing, if perhaps not any lost "Belief" you might have either.


Funny is it not, but perhaps still the ice sculpture for next that of water, in that it could also be a face as well.


Perhaps "The Abyss" here (a movie) and needs checking.


But why the heck that of the broom or brush, if you could be still riding the horse, if not such a thing as black or white, next for Blocksberg,
or any "smithereens" eitther?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brocken


Old story, and perhaps not


Should tell, being an astronomer of sorts, also that I could be adhering by the book, if not listening in either.


Oops, are next subsets that of sets as well, in the same way as also fractals?


Or could you make it one science for another, in that it also could be that of the unexplainable, and also so-called "UFO's" visible in the sky?


Yes, the nightclub could still be open, if not the soapboax either, or even the zipper for that of your pants (sometimes knobs).


Guess what, pretentious, if not any precarious either, except for not any rumors either.


Still the ladybug for that of a lovable insect, if not any fingers in the dough either, for sometimes making bread,
if not such a thing for that of science either, and next also think you could know everything.


So, still catching the footsteps of your neighbor, if perhaps not God either, for next that of infinity, and also that of numbers.


Yes, "ready, set, go", next for both that of sets and subsets, if not any cook either, next for still that of inifinity.


If you pick up the telephone for next dialing a nine or ten digit number, you still get at the whole number, of course.


But next that sieving is perhaps meant with a purpose in mind.


Pick a random number ending in 2, 4, 6, 8, or 0, and you know that it could be divisible by at least 2.


Should a prime number next be divisible by another such one?


Perhaps no here, as the answer.


Where is the analogy, or reverse opposite of (2^4096+1) when it comes to that of numbers (except for not any factors, of course)?


Should I perhaps make it -1 here, and next think that I also found a new Mersenne prime?


Perhaps no as the answer here, because of the algorithm itself, except for not you liking me either, as well.


Still on 1 1/2, or maybe 2 line separation here, and needs a fix.

[storflyt32]

Starting a new one, because just curious here.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001147502726


Flips around at first, because of a P55 at first.


But next so, because a number already known, or perhaps still work to do?


2+3=5, and 2*3 = 6, but next perhaps not so for a C86 either, in that the factors should perhaps be already known.


If I take the left corner, for next also driving left, perhaps not any shorter than turning to the right, and also ending up in the same path, if not any straight, or even dead end either.


Here a C147 Aliquot sequence number for just such a thing (the 7529... number) and also that it could be dividing almost everything, without any result.


Possibly so because here -1 and +1 chose to kiss each other goodbye, and with a bit of fanfare as well.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanfare


Oh, if you wish, but is not sentiment anything else, or other, than perhaps sentimental?


7529... / P60, of sorts, and next not any luck either.


So, if perhaps "Carpet crawler" for such a thing, also that bird Phoenix could be raisin from the ashes, except for not any such thing as a semiprime either, when it still could be a composite number.


Both a C110, and also a C121, relates to something at the other end, next for that of complexity given, which we could think, or make as an overall one.


Really, a fake number, or numbers of sorts, at the end, for that of a "summa summarum", like also RSA-768 as well.


Already my little bah, or perhaps dang here, for this number, in that my computer does not like it, or neither its factorization either.


Thinking that perhaps P3 = 229, only for that of a subset of this number, or factor, is perhaps wrong, except for not the answer at the other hand.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000639586400


Here good example.


And not finding the PRP743 down my list...


Getting back to it.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001147517906


And not any easy here either, except for being a hero, for that of a prime number.


Editing the wrong post, I could make it tighter for that above.




Hmm, 7529... / C89 = 10811237782460048361800082292361625292864478793719765789089398937019979423724815937287953


and so on, almost forever.




http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001151325117


Except for not any "he-man" either, for such a thing as Fermat, could perhaps be given a closer look here, for that of a possible factorization.


Better do the shopping right now, before getting too tired, because here I also could add a P41 to the Factor Database, where it previously was only a P16.


The previously mentioned C102 did not make it with ecm, using 2^21 curves, and the SIQS not so as well, and here stuck for now, because not having time for any 2^22 curves right now.


If reporting as FF (meaning fully factored), take it rather for an offense, rather that of a real fact.


I know precisely my own writing, and also that it became wrong, except for perhaps also the wrong forum as well.


Perhaps I know even that, for such a thing, except for also sometimes a shot in the dark as well, for what we could possibly be doing.


Adding a bit more right now, and hopefully you will like it as well.


Anyway, I had some three loose factors reported, only because it flipped around for also factors at the other end.


One such was a P126, with probably a P13, or maybe P15 preceding it, for next a quite big pair the other way around.


The problem is that really this could become the end result, if resources permitted, for also such a thing for that of factorization.


Bummer me, but I happened to do such a thing with a pair of P100 factors, but next you should also know that I found the secret.


It does not always work, of course, but could end up being some PXX digits in my list for that of RSA numbers, or perhaps factors.


But rather a PXX is needed here, for a proper method, if not any factorization, and also a close approximation of numbers as well,
when possibly needed.


As an example, the FDB did an automatic update of a tight P30, versus P31 factor, next with something at the other end.


Needs checking, but in one such case it became a P187 factor.


Perhaps leaving it that what numbers could be having to tell, could be the best thing, except for sometimes ourselves faking anything either,
because not everything is readily factorized either.


If doing such a thing with a pair of P100 factors, only because I know, and not any other reason either, or whatsoever.


Funny perhaps, but even a hard working person could sometimes need rest, for that of also leisure, when doing such a thing, except for not the opposite either.


I had a computer disk failure earlier on, and also some two falling to the ground as well.


Becomes continuing on the rest, for that of also a start, if perhaps not any continuation either.


Here also a bit of excitement as well, in that not only primes for Sierpinski/Riesel is being found (SR5), but also Extended Sierpinski as well (ESP).


Except for still the P9 for such a thing, of course, which you next could be pulling the plug on, for next also details, leaving still the elusive Mersenne prime up in the sleeves, sometimes,
for that of also a guess.


Because here only one such right now, for that of myself, except for not any "Trick of the tail" either, next with a couple of big, or larger factors.


Example for that of a bit of nonsense, except for still also a separate file for that of my small factors (P9 or less).




P10 = 1020064121


Here what I said in the previous, and next that this should not be any candidate either, like also many others.


You perhaps know, or notice that I changed font slightly, in recent past.


Getting a bit of bad hands, as you perhaps know, therefore the reason.


Clicking on the P41 above, while not in Edit mode, and it apparently does not make it for the copy and paste here, but could be editing the individual post, if needed.


Got a P47 versus a P or PRP 100 here, for next a long factorization, and if together with the P41, next quite a bit of double pair, because here also a larger one as well.


Checking out, and continuing with this next, for also a possible reporting.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001152820934


Edit: I can not resist here, for that of a little king, for that of a couple of factors, but now it also became too many blank lines, for only that of editing.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001153111702


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001153112064


A bit of surprise here, except for also the flip-around as well, with a pair of P19 and P95 factors, but need the link first, and next adding.


But except for that, could you possibly explain the first one here, when it happens?


The answer is that you could be faking two different factorizations, in order to next also mix it together, for next also combining as well, for that of the result.


Possibly it became 1 1/2 for the width of a line right now, but except for the "Message" box at the bottom, together with also icons, not any much I could do here,
except for suffering from a poor keyboard right now.

[storflyt32]

Better a new one right now, because of also a bit of anguish.


Possibly an error of sorts, because doing so twice in a row, with only a single sentence at first, but next also getting stuck.


Or rather a new posting start.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001155832083


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001155832119


"Mea culpa", except for not having the factors already, at least for the latter one.


Read my lips for also a couple of postings at Seti@home, for also making it nonsense at times, while still also questions about the world around us as well.


The first one above is having P50+ factors, for some three in all, or total, and needs to be added manually, I think.


The second, some two P30+. factors, while also a P110, or the like, and also needs a redo as well.


Also a bit too much line spacing here as well, as previously mentioned.


If not wrong, the second part of it in right now, except for still the P50 pair in the first one.


Anyway (for that of a dark shadow in the face), did you try factoring a number like RSA-2048, only because of a C200, or maybe even P200 close, or following?


Next that it did not work out either, for such a thing, except for still a bit of shame being felt?


Give it a try, for sometimes working, if not any sense of disbelief either.


If some two P200 factors, next a C217 or so remaining, except for still not any good factors for such either.


Or rather only "To the point", for still two or more such numbers only being factors, when possibly being found, or detected.

[storflyt32]

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001162488920


Guess what, but I clicked the red-x here, for that of closing the window.


A redo here takes some three minutes to complete, but anyway.


Because perhaps Hans Zimmer such a good musician here, except for all the things we already know.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001162593805


Here "failure to equate relation", two times, except perhaps the other thing as well.



http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001162596250



Edit: Need the flip-flop, for that around, as well.

[MisterBitcoin]

Hans Zimmer, one of the best living music producers in Hollywood.

Be aware, there are much more "trailer score" producers out there; I recommend:


Audiomachine (Mark Petrie, e.g.)
Brand X Music

Epic Score
Two Steps from Hell (Thomas Bergersen, Nich Pheonix, etc)
and many more...


Also I recommend GRV´s extended remixes; found by YT Channel "Mortifer V."




Hi!


Agree with you here, for also listening in.


Not getting to it all, for also catching, but at least a bit of great music here, and for this catches my senses, and also way of work.


Perhaps we should agree here, on a stumbling block of sorts, for next also the biggest factor, except for not any resolve in between our hands either.



Just only ahead here, for perhaps not making it any Riesel either, for that of any Riesel prime, but next any what bother, for also any bother,
except for not making it such a thing as factors themselves.


Endover. like a game, and next also leftover as well, for almost that of a sieving number, for next also ...80 as well.


Next, divides with at least 2, 2, 2, 2, and 5, in order to make it 2, but from there, perhaps no-one could tell, because only a waste of space here,
for that of a sieving factor.


Oh, at least I got it here, for that of starters, but perhaps does not help either.


Why not key in a C71 instead, in order to get at its factors?


Still only for that of starters, except for not any goal either, which we might seek to accomplish in one way, or another.


So it goes.


Edit: Catch you later.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001163628924


Why not make it C100 here, for only that of senses, if perhaps not any belief either.


Are we stilll supposedly dumb, for also fools as well, except for not making it any human society for that of any cleverness, or even skill,
which could be possibly around.


Only asking. of course, except for not any fool-hearted either.




Edit: Should I perhaps respond here, except for not any original, or intentional "gist" either, for next I am, for next also you are?


Oh, never mind.


C87 = 119843123712066146769586974122995124696247859599318570405528299663491446893335086505717


Buh, Hmm, working on that.




http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001163577400




What about that one?



http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001165884844




http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001165835493


Here it perhaps could be flipped around for order of sequence, because the end factor came up first here, for that of not being reported.




C83 = 24787913421613610885120573759275707936452851377282937435980987986309300027349495967


Same here, for not having checked today, but apparently needing the 2^22 ecm curves parameter here, and still running.


If perhaps ending up in two separate threads, I did not really notice, but also the fact that when still leaving a couple of numbers alone,
most of the other things, for also stuff, now becomes sorted out, for also its details, so perhaps not any much number theory either, as a possible result.




P29 = 94541614107843913199950635143


This factor, towards the end, with still composite numbers left, sits on each side of each other, with a slight difference.


Here the sqrt() in between this time, and adding the latter four factors.



http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001165885820


I do not know exactly where this becomes easy, for next more hard, but often the flip-around is needed, for only getting the factors the opposite way around.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001166558633


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001166559617


Note, loose factors again, but I find it a bit appropriate here as well.


Noticing the blank lines, for also catching it as well, sorry about that, but not any intended here.


Edit: Nice icon, for also left to stay, except for not any believe in such a thing either.




http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001166559617


Factoring example, except for not any fasit, for that of a compulsory example only.


Oops, for that of my bad English, for also a need to sometimes only reiterate. except for only spooky words, for such a thing,


Edti;


For only a couple of loose factors here, namely the C102 above.


Oh, for that of only stealing my thread.






Editt; edit,edit,always that of so, for only this stupid forum, being also the next finder,
for also the best prime number as well, for also that of its finder.


De not pretend to be any slim. for also fat, because this it could still only be for such, namely that of finding the biggest prime number.


So it goes.

[storflyt32]

Should I make a new one here perhaps?


Keying in two numbers in the wrong order again, and only 2^5, 7, and 2633 for the last one, next also thinking, that I was some 2^2, and 19 off from the Magic number during the last week.


A C100 made of two P50's, or rather two P50's making for a C100, could be a bit hard to factorize, if not making it a P80 instead, for at least one of the factors.


On the calculator, for sometimes HP (Hewlett Packard), you get the RPN, which means the reverse, or opposite Polish notation, I think.


P / (X * Y) could sometimes factorize, if bit length is still not too large.


Then it becomes the Divide and Conquer, if not split and rule we could perhaps know about.


If we know that there could be a list of primes for that of P2XXXX and upwards, and still the small one above, something is wrong.




http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001170056862




Here 21330.1503 seconds for the total factorization, ending up with a P41 and P93 at the end, and of course there could be even more such factors.




https://www.newscientist.com/article...k_primenumbers


Anyway, I read this article as well during the week.


The stubborn composite may always be the semiprime of sorts, and at times also testing for such.


It did not work that well before, but at least one time in recent time, it became a factor the other way, when making it versus the C617, for that of web privacy.


Still it should be, except for perhaps not impossible either, but rather that "numbermaniac" could be still one thing, for rather the other one myself, or just having fun when possible.



Pierre de Fermat was definitely a good mathematician, but rather we could rely on Marin Mersenne here, who should be the favorite person here.




Before my recent problems, all these ended up on my disk, for that of the small ones, including 61, and 127, and next we know that they are only divisible from 2.


Correct myself, for that of 2^n-1, of course.


I personally ended up with a titanic prime at first, and ended up with one gigantic prime in the second attempt.


The logical question could be asking the way of which making it a megaprime as well, but here apparently left in the dark, for also stumbling as well.


Perhaps we already know that "faking" does not always work, except for knowing the precise answer.


Making it just another P18, and only one single step on a long journey, which could take for ever reaching the ultimate goal.

[storflyt32]

Wohoo perhaps, but experiencing quite a bit of nasty problem, taking away a whole week.


Inserted, or plugged in an ASUS infrared USB stick, or connector, for that of a plug, because the previous Microsoft keyboard had liquid spilled all over.


Next picking up the pieces, for only getting back where I was, and I did not look at any numbers either.


I had one factorization, continuing on the previous, but needs getting back at that.


Adding the link when having it, and also updating the records, where they are needed.


I mentioned that of the little smile, if perhaps not at Seti@home instead, except for not a factorization rather be that of sieving instead, for only that of making, for also extracting, a couple of factors.


For one thing, a simple multiply, could also mean known factors as well, and of course the naming, for also Terminology, went out of my head.


Really, Probability "could" be just only a Probabilistic issue, or argument as well, because we just only know, except for still not making it any Proof, for just science.


So, 2 * 2 = 4 perhaps, and also the Fermat factors as well, for just the same, except for still not the prime numbers, for also factors, making up possible Mersenne primes.


Are you supposed to tell me that sieving does not work, except for still not any stupid of myself either?


The X*Y, for also X*Y*Z as well, or sometimes, could be making for the prime number, or factors, not yet detected, and we should know that.



Perhaps it could be still a fact, except for not any stupid of myself either, but if perhaps trying out PFGW64, for only that of LLR, could I still make it sieving instead, for only that of a possible answer,
except for perhaps not any better either?



Wait, wait, wait, and therefore a delay as well, except for still not any consecutive either, for only that of a possible answer.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendency


This one I did not mention, or come across earlier, but should it be any bleeding skin, for only that of fishbone?


Shred, mangle, mutilate, or make it into pieces, for even a book of sorts, and next also perhaps also shred of Evidence as well, for that of given knowledge.


Is the pen and pencil still a replacement for that of the hand itself, except for not any grip either, for what it could next hold?


If perhaps rather a balancing acts of sorts, it could be a Thoroid of sorts (needs checking).


Read the fine print, and next "not known, for that of Mersenne 48, versus 49 of sorts (still needs checking).


Oops, I was slipping the fingers at Seti@home instead, except for not any fine tuning here instead.


Perhaps we hit a wall of sorts (LLR) if you will, for perhaps only knowing, except for not any guessing either.


Making it order out of Chaos, for just order, order, and perhaps you know what the old lady just said.


48, 49, 50, except for perhaps not any 51, or even 60 either, for only that of provable science, when perhaps only that of numbers instead.


Is it Saint, saint, for also that of "saliva", or could it just be only irresistible instead?


Sometimes we could be speaking about a reversal, for also irreversal, except for the other thing I forgot to say.


Prove, and next also proving as well, and you could next also make, for only that of science.


We know that we could be encountering a limit right now, for also a barrier as well, and next do not exclude and 64-bit science either, for that of Methodology and tools, when also that of a bit of shambles as well.


Should it be a difficult one here, for just a P42?


Took a while, but perhaps a C99 here, for that of the whole number.


Getting back at it in just a short moment.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001181862897


- - -


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001184351070


See you in the morning here, for only catching you later.

[storflyt32]

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001188286310


Here a nice ending, for that of a P101, and only syntax for such.




http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000647336006


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000643754575


Perhaps the opposite way for better clarity, but except for not readily doable here, it is in fact the logical continuation of the sequence here,
for ending up with the P564 which should be well known for just a Fermat factor.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat...Fermat_numbers


Here the F11 a little down the page, or end factor of (2^2048+1), and also just eats a bit of cake from the C1133 of (2^4096+1) when flipping around, doing it the opposite way,
because here just in the door from the shopping, and knowing that the factor here became added.


Doing a little more here after the cup of coffee.



http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001191390000


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001191390294


Here is one such, for only an example.


Becomes a P45 here, for also a P119.


Total factoring time = 55848.5684 seconds


I could have it for you later here, but also that this is not the smallest one either.


The 4177..number here, if you do not mind, for perhaps not any foolish either,


What if I could perhaps add it here, for only my own sake, if not any knowledge?



OK, added it here, for perhaps not the worse either, but rather its correct place, for just only meaning.


Never mind, because we should know the flip-around here.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001190980185


The silly or stupid thing could still that of making it a balancing act, for only what factoring is supposed to be meant to be,
except for only Mersenne primes being only factors of each other, for just respectively so, except for the number still in between,
which could still be a larger one.


I do not make it for the really big numbers, as you probably know, but rather that eating a cake, could be still a bit of a show,
for not taking your mouth any full either.


SGS primes should be still for an ending, and here I think it should be +1 most of the time, except for also some four Woodall tasks
running in the background, for only just BOINC, and next also quite long, for also -1 at the end.


I once heard it mentioned that 28 could be a perfect number, if perhaps not any RSA number for such a thing instead.


It became a couple of stuck hands here, for what you perhaps know, so therefore not picking up the last numbers, for writing it down,
but if possible, I could get back at this as well, for only pure interest, if not any real or genuine importance.


Lost the factorization tasks here, for only a fuse being replaced, but here in my opinion, the C813, for rather FF813 looks better,
for only niftier, or just pretty, when also knowing that it could be a factor as well, when doing it the opposite way.


But next, never say never, for only shaking hands, and perhaps we should know about that as well.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001197368353


This one, quite late in the night, and perhaps standing out a little, for just edgy, because here perhaps a P97 or so which it could be multiplied with,
for only a wrong number being keyed in earlier on, for that of the composite number you could get.


Next need looking for the P97, because it should be in my list somewhere, and also trying to fix the blank lines here as well.


Anyway, could try out with those factors I have, from only the starting point, because here a bit of problems with my fingers,
and I did not pick up the last one I got, for at least being reported.


Doing so, and it became yet one more for such.


Total factoring time = 72747.9059 seconds


Here flipping one way, for only just easy, while a bit more difficult next the other way, and here it became one such.


I will have both links for you after the glass of milk just standing in the fridge.



http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001197372212


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001197372438


Just hold on tight a little, but next ended up there.


So, pretend to be a hero instead, except for perhaps not, and you could make it X*Y, for also X*Y*Z as well, for only multiplication.


Perhaps only small caps here, but needs getting back, for just checking.


P35*P36, or P35*P36, and next also P35*P37, for also P35*P36*P37, except for only two factors, for only a wished, or desired number, if you will.


Next that of RSA here, for such a thing, and for that, also "Wind him up" as well, for only such a thing.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Security


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_(cryptosystem)


But rather Divide and conquer, for just another thing, except for not any intended meaning or purpose for such a thing here either.


The problem is that I could take each factor in my list, for only having the rest factorized, when next also that of such being just flipped around,
for only just the other way.


For that, I could rather pick up the next one in my list, hoping that it could be factorized in a similar way, and becoming only just an excluding factor,
for the thing we could wish to reach at, for next also accomplish.


Sometimes good, for also excellent, because here picking up the P97 I was able to get across, except for not knowing whether it was the right one either.


Continuing down the list, and perhaps a little sad to just notice that it could be just only the small difference, for only Differentiation, making up the whole difference here,
except for not the meaning of the other number either, for perhaps not any similar either.


Except for perhaps thinking in a similar way at another place being visited, for also frequented as well, namely Seti@home.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001197761081


Here that of "failure to equate relation", for that of the siqs, leaving me with only that of ecm instead, just for now.


Eat your cake instead, and feel a sense of comfort, except not any welcome either.