![]() |
|
|
#298 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
B7A16 Posts |
Quote:
70*85^1586+1 (8*88^1094+1)/3 (35*75^1844-1)/2 Thus, S85, S88 and R75 are proven. Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-07 at 19:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
1011010111002 Posts |
No, I thought it was clear, I got my own work: 158 hours of my work here and you're unable to run WinPFGW?
You're testing to n~1500, which is done in seconds with pfgw. I don't know which program you're using so how much can you/we trust your results. Notes: - Stop posting tons of files and posts with pages of numbers, update the Wiki pages instead. - You gave some values in bold, but nowhere explained the meaning. - Change the display style of the table like this: it's more compact and easier to watch - Give the GCD for every k-val (I know it's easy to calculate, but noone will do this for many k-values, see example for base 2 & 3) - Put more own work on current given values instead of creating more new conjectures (2nd, 3rd, 4th CK). |
|
|
|
|
|
#300 |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
2·13·113 Posts |
The remain k's <= 10000 for S15 are: (include the k's without from testing)
225, 341, 343, 641, 965, 1205, 1827, 2263, 2323, 2403, 2445, 2461, 2471, 2531, 2813, 3347, 3375, 3625, 3797, 3935, 3959, 4045, 4169, 4355, 4665, 4733, 5115, 5145, 5169, 5793, 5891, 5983, 6061, 6331, 6476, 6553, 6598, 6661, 6775, 6849, 7087, 7693, 7711, 7773, 7975, 7979, 8017, 8161, 8181, 8271, 8603, 8881, 9215, 9615, 9643, 9767, 9783, 9857 |
|
|
|
|
|
#301 |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
2×13×113 Posts |
The remain k's <= 10000 for R15 are: (include the k's without from testing)
47, 203, 239, 407, 437, 451, 705, 889, 893, 1945, 2049, 2245, 2487, 2507, 2689, 2699, 2863, 2940, 3045, 3059, 3163, 3179, 3261, 3409, 3585, 3697, 3701, 3725, 4173, 4249, 4609, 4771, 4877, 5041, 5243, 5425, 5441, 5503, 5669, 5857, 5913, 5963, 6105, 6231, 6447, 6555, 6765, 6787, 6879, 6999, 7386, 7407, 7459, 7473, 7527, 7615, 7683, 7687, 7859, 8099, 8610, 8621, 8671, 8839, 8863, 9025, 9267, 9409, 9655, 9663, 9707, 9817, 9955 |
|
|
|
|
|
#302 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
2·13·113 Posts |
Quote:
{225, 3375} {341, 5115} {343, 5145} {641, 9615} Thus, the remain k<=10000 for S15 are: (totally 54 k's) 225, 341, 343, 641, 965, 1205, 1827, 2263, 2323, 2403, 2445, 2461, 2471, 2531, 2813, 3347, 3625, 3797, 3935, 3959, 4045, 4169, 4355, 4665, 4733, 5169, 5793, 5891, 5983, 6061, 6331, 6476, 6553, 6598, 6661, 6775, 6849, 7087, 7693, 7711, 7773, 7975, 7979, 8017, 8161, 8181, 8271, 8603, 8881, 9215, 9643, 9767, 9783, 9857 Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-08 at 14:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#303 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
1011011110102 Posts |
Quote:
{47, 705} {203, 3045} {239, 3585} {407, 6105} {437, 6555} {451, 6765} Thus, the remain k<=10000 for R15 are: (totally 67 k's) 47, 203, 239, 407, 437, 451, 889, 893, 1945, 2049, 2245, 2487, 2507, 2689, 2699, 2863, 2940, 3059, 3163, 3179, 3261, 3409, 3697, 3701, 3725, 4173, 4249, 4609, 4771, 4877, 5041, 5243, 5425, 5441, 5503, 5669, 5857, 5913, 5963, 6231, 6447, 6787, 6879, 6999, 7386, 7407, 7459, 7473, 7527, 7615, 7683, 7687, 7859, 8099, 8610, 8621, 8671, 8839, 8863, 9025, 9267, 9409, 9655, 9663, 9707, 9817, 9955 Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-08 at 14:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#304 |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
B7A16 Posts |
Completed all extended Sierpinski and Riesel bases 65<=b<=128 (except SR66, S70, SR78, SR82, SR96, SR106, SR108, SR112, SR120, SR124, SR126 and SR127).
These are the text files. Note: For S125, all k = m^3 proven composite by full algebra factors. For S128, all k = m^7 proven composite by full algebra factors. For S128, all k = 2^r with r = 3, 5 or 6 mod 7 has no possible prime, see post #265. For R109, all k = m^2 with m = 2 or 3 mod 5 proven composite by partial algebra factors. For R110, all k = m^2 with m = 6 or 31 mod 37 proven composite by partial algebra factors. For R114, all k = m^2 with m = 2 or 3 mod 5 proven composite by partial algebra factors. For R118, all k = m^2 with m = 4 or 13 mod 17 proven composite by partial algebra factors. For R121, all k = m^2 proven composite by full algebra factors. For R125, all k = m^3 proven composite by full algebra factors. For R128, all k = m^7 proven composite by full algebra factors. The prime 4*107^32586+1 (S107, k=4) is given by CRUS. The prime 20*110^933+1 (S110, k=20) is given by CRUS. The prime 4*113^2958+1 (S113, k=4) is given by CRUS. The prime 30*115^47376+1 (S115, k=30) is given by CRUS. The prime 2*122^755+1 (S122, k=2) is given by CRUS. The prime 16*122^764+1 (S122, k=16) is given by CRUS. The prime 25*122^674+1 (S122, k=25) is given by CRUS. The prime 31*122^1236+1 (S122, k=31) is given by CRUS. The prime 37*122^1622+1 (S122, k=37) is given by CRUS. The prime 41*128^39271+1 (S128, k=41) is given by CRUS. The prime 42*128^13001+1 (S128, k=42) is given by CRUS. The prime 2*107^21910-1 (R107, k=2) is given by CRUS. The prime 17*110^2598-1 (R110, k=17) is given by CRUS. The prime 23*110^78120-1 (R110, k=23) is given by CRUS. The prime 37*110^1689-1 (R110, k=37) is given by CRUS. The prime 29*118^599-1 (R118, k=29) is given by CRUS. The prime 62*121^13101-1 (R121, k=62) is given by CRUS. The prime 23*128^2118-1 (R128, k=23) is given by CRUS. The prime 26*128^1442-1 (R128, k=26) is given by CRUS. The prime 29*128^211192-1 (R128, k=29) is given by CRUS. The prime 37*128^699-1 (R128, k=37) is given by CRUS. Some test limits converted by CRUS: S117, k=58: at n=250K. S118, k=48: at n=700K. S122, k=34: at n=700K. S128, k=40: at n=1.2857M. (no such k's for all tested Riesel bases 105<b<=128) Some test limits converted by GFN stats: S122, k=1: at n=2^24-1. S128, k=16: at n=(2^35-4)/7-1 Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-10 at 17:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#305 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
55728 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
base remain k S107 1 S109 1 S110 none (proven) S111 none (proven) S113 13, 17 S114 none (proven) S115 17, 47, 50 S116 none (proven) S117 11, 58, 59, 75, 117 S118 48 S119 none (proven) S121 none (proven) S122 1, 34 S123 1, 3, 41 S125 none (proven) S128 16, 40 Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-08 at 16:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#306 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
2·13·113 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
base remain k R107 3 R109 none (proven) R110 none (proven) R111 none (proven) R113 none (proven) R114 none (proven) R115 4, 13, 23, 43, 45, 51 R116 none (proven) R117 5, 17, 33, 141 R118 27, 43 R119 none (proven) R121 79 R122 none (proven) R123 11 R125 none (proven) R128 none (proven) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#307 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
2·13·113 Posts |
Quote:
First, if b^n+1 (for even b) or (b^n+1)/2 (for odd b) is prime, then n must be a power of 2 (including 1), since if m is an odd factor of n and m>1, then For even b, b^n+1 = (b^(n/m)+1) * (b^((m-1)n/m)-b^((m-2)n/m)+b^((m-3)n/m)-...-b^(3n/m)+b^(2n/m)-b^(n/m)+1) and both of the two factors are > 1 For odd b, (b^n+1)/2 = ((b^(n/m)+1)/2) * (b^((m-1)n/m)-b^((m-2)n/m)+b^((m-3)n/m)-...-b^(3n/m)+b^(2n/m)-b^(n/m)+1) and both of the two factors are > 1 Thus b^n+1 (for even b) or (b^n+1)/2 (for odd b) is composite. Second, if b = q^m and k = q^r, then k*b^n+1 = q^(r+n*m)+1 Thus, if k*b^n+1 (for even b) or (k*b^n+1)/2 (for odd b) is prime, then r+n*m must be a power of 2, let it be 2^s, thus r+n*m = 2^s, thus 2^s = n*m+r, thus 2^s = r mod m. Thus, if the equation 2^x = r (mod m) has no solution, then k*b^n+1 (for even b) or (k*b^n+1)/2 (for odd b) is always composite. Finally, we choose some values of m: Code:
m 2^n mod m (start with n=0) 1 0, 0, 0, ... 2 1, 0, 0, 0, ... 3 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, ... 4 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, ... 5 1, 2, 4, 3, 1, 2, 4, 3, ... 6 1, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, ... 7 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, ... 8 1, 2, 4, 0, 0, 0, ... 9 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, ... 10 1, 2, 4, 8, 6, 2, 4, 8, 6, ... 11 1, 2, 4, 8, 5, 10, 9, 7, 3, 6, 1, 2, ... 12 1, 2, 4, 8, 4, 8, 4, 8, ... Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-09 at 00:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#308 | |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
2·13·113 Posts |
Quote:
If the exponent of highest power of 2 dividing r < the exponent of highest power of 2 dividing m, then gcd(k+1,b-1) is neither 1 nor 2, thus this number is neither GFN nor GFN, this number is a generalized repunit number in a negative base. (In fact, gcd(k+1,b-1) is either 1 or 2 if and only if the exponent of highest power of 2 dividing r >= the exponent of highest power of 2 dividing m) Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2017-06-09 at 00:32 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The dual Sierpinski/Riesel problem | sweety439 | sweety439 | 14 | 2021-02-15 15:58 |
| Semiprime and n-almost prime candidate for the k's with algebra for the Sierpinski/Riesel problem | sweety439 | sweety439 | 11 | 2020-09-23 01:42 |
| The reverse Sierpinski/Riesel problem | sweety439 | sweety439 | 20 | 2020-07-03 17:22 |
| Sierpinski/ Riesel bases 6 to 18 | robert44444uk | Conjectures 'R Us | 139 | 2007-12-17 05:17 |
| Sierpinski/Riesel Base 10 | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 11 | 2007-12-17 05:08 |