![]() |
|
|
#133 |
|
Nov 2004
California
32508 Posts |
GAAACK! I went though my old output files and found a big prime I didn't report!
2995125705*2^529005-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
Yes, it is right there in one of 'lresults' file you sent me but I haven't noticed either! However, this prompted me to finally compile the list of all results I got so far. Currently there are 3 files, 1 candidate per line (without date/time and V/U lines), with following ranges included. The files will be available shortly on the 15k server.
lres_300k: 340-350, 385-390k lres_400k: 436-500k lres_500k: 504-512, 520-544, 548-556k I cannot find the 500-504k file, Larry if you still have it can you mail it to me. 544-548 will be included in a day or two, it's my range but I cannot access the box right now. The rest above 512k is in progress. If anybody is in possession of results for ranges not listed above please mail them to me. Thank you. Edit: ( 6 hours later) I can ping but I cannot ftp the server so the upload of result files has to be postponed ...
Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2005-01-19 at 07:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Jun 2004
California
27710 Posts |
508-520 done, no primes.
I will wait the next ranges to be available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Nov 2003
2×1,811 Posts |
Sieving in the n=560-588k range to p=5.75E12 is done and I created the files but I won't be able to put them on the server before 1200 GMT on 20th. However, I noticed that the first file, 560to564.txt is not affected by additional sieving, so if somebody wants he can get that one right now. The other two are affected, don't use them.
The result files are alrady on the server, I'll provide links in the first post of the thread. Happy crunching! Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2005-01-20 at 04:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
May 2004
22×7 Posts |
Than I take the 560-564 file ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
OK Keller, good luck! Other ranges to 588k sieved to 5750bn are now available on the server. Help yourself!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
Jun 2004
California
277 Posts |
Reserving 564-568
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
May 2004
348 Posts |
Sorry, I had to give up some ressources because of reasons that aren't interesting. I was just able to do some tests on my home pc and this also needs to work on something else ...
I attached the input file with those numbers removed, that I was already able to complete. When I have more ressources again, I will do some tests again but atm I would just slow everything down :) Sorry again, Keller |
|
|
|
|
|
#141 |
|
Nov 2004
California
23·3·71 Posts |
I'll take up the remaining 560to564 numbers. Thanks for providing the
updated input file. -Larry |
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
Keller, no probs, but can you mail me results (residues) of (k, n) pairs your processed. If you have limited resources I can prepere for you a smaller range to check, just let me know.
Larry, thanks for your help. |
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
May 2004
22·7 Posts |
THey have already been sent 30hours ago :P
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Choose your own K and work on finding a top-5000 prime! | lsoule | Riesel Prime Search | 421 | 2021-07-27 23:51 |
| Test a Specific Exponent in Prime95. When it is 100% done, does it mean I find a new prime number? | king | Information & Answers | 5 | 2018-02-21 18:15 |
| If you find a prime... | paulunderwood | NeRDs | 0 | 2014-02-03 05:09 |
| Help test 210885 - Find a new top 5000 prime! | SlashDude | Riesel Prime Search | 121 | 2008-01-03 08:47 |
| The fastest way to a top-5000 prime? | lsoule | 15k Search | 13 | 2005-09-19 20:24 |