![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
11001000002 Posts |
Hi all,
Here is a mathematics problem. For which positive integers n, is there a sum of n positive integers that is a perfect square? Source : Math horizons, September 2016, p. 31. Some are aware that the sum of integers from 1 to n can be written as s=n*(n+1)/2. Also, such numbers as 1,3,6,10, ... are known as triangular numbers. Think of the sport bowling. There are 10 bowling pins and the pins are arranged in a triangle. Some Maple code reveals that the first few n that satisfy the above criterion are 1,8,288,1681. Can anyone find a general form? I did not find this sequence in the OEIS.org. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22·1,549 Posts |
How do you define "perfect square"? Must it be integers only? Or can it also be fractions and complex numbers etc.?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary
148410 Posts |
Quote:
"Call a positive integer n good if the sum of n consecutive integers could be a perfect square, and bad otherwise. For example, 3 is good because 2+3+4=9=3^2. In Square sums, you were asked to find all bad numbers." It is a quite different problem from the above, and has got a better wording. The problem is very well known. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
32016 Posts |
Hi all,
@retina I should have posted that we want to assume that n is an integer. I did not want to consider fractions, irrationals, and other real numbers. Further, I want to restrict this puzzle to the real numbers. Complex numbers are out Also, this problem is well known by those that well know it. I copied it from a local University "POW" Problem Of the Week. Luckily, I am still on their email distribution list. Regards, Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
25×52 Posts |
Hi mersenneforum
To be clear, perfect square numbers are numbers like 0, 1, 4, 9, ... I guess that was a definition by example Regards Matthew |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
838410 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-11-03 at 11:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Aug 2006
3·1,993 Posts |
Quote:
1 is good because 1 is a square. 2 is good because 4+5 = 3^2. 3 is good because 2 + 3 + 4 = 3^2. 4 is bad because n + n+1 + n+2 + n+3 = 4n + 6 is never a square. 5 is good because 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 = 5^2. So I get a very different list from you: 4, 12, 16, 20, 28, 36, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 68, 76, 80, 84, 92, 100, ... which is A108269 in the OEIS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
1075310 Posts |
Quote:
Find solutions (m,n) in integers to the Diophantine equation m^2 = n(n+1)/2. He further asserts that the the sequence of values for m is not in the OEIS. Last fiddled with by xilman on 2016-11-03 at 14:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
100000110000002 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-11-03 at 14:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Aug 2006
175B16 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
25·52 Posts |
Hi Mersenneforum,
Thank you for your replies. C.R.Greathouse, you seem to have figured it out. Good show. Regards, Matthew |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When I was your age.....CHALLENGE | petrw1 | Lounge | 14 | 2009-11-23 02:18 |
| Challenge | science_man_88 | Miscellaneous Math | 229 | 2009-09-07 08:08 |
| rsa-640 challenge | ValerieVonck | Factoring | 58 | 2005-10-24 15:54 |
| Another challenge | R.D. Silverman | Programming | 24 | 2005-07-27 21:08 |
| Who is Challenge? | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 2 | 2004-07-22 12:56 |