![]() |
|
|
#287 | ||
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
16FE16 Posts |
Quote:
i excluded the ks u mentioned because i saw they were either reserved or already completed to 35k thought their status may now have changed the ks u mentioned are not in my files because of the above reason the k/n pairs i tested are in the prp file i sent with the lresults and primes file Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
Apprentice Crank
Mar 2006
7068 Posts |
k=1991 complete to n=470K. I'll be on vacation for two weeks, and I'll post the residues a few days after I get back. No primes were found between n=440K and 470K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
22·727 Posts |
i'm working on 1000<k<2000 and 35000<=n<=50000.
i will include all primes/twins in the summary-pages after finishing this effort! |
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2·33·109 Posts |
i am taking 1009 up as far as i can to fill in the uncertainty of what has already been done
i plan on taking it to 300k or above i am now at 164k new primes are: 1009 35059 1009 38935 1009 70409 1009 107411 |
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
290810 Posts |
i finished 1000<k<2000 for 35k<n<50k for all k's in that range.
there're 516 primes (with some confirmed) and no twin. i begun to update the summary page and will upload the complete page this week including all new primes as list. |
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×33×109 Posts |
1009 is now at 220k
no new primes at 205k i stopped to do some more sieving and i removed 1/13th of the remaining candiates so progress should speed up |
|
|
|
|
|
#293 |
|
Apprentice Crank
Mar 2006
2·227 Posts |
k=1991 complete to n=520K. No primes have been found since my last status update, and the residues are attached below.
Also, I'm releasing this k to free up resources for my other reserved k=241. |
|
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×33×109 Posts |
1009 is now at 260k
speed should now double as i have got a new Q6600 which tests twice as fast all primes are correct up til now i am going to start on 19920911 as it is my birth date in yyyy/mm/dd format |
|
|
|
|
|
#295 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×33×109 Posts |
1009 is now at 309k with no new primes
i seem to now be in uncharted terittory now so it would be nice to find some primes ![]() 19921109 is at 243k with these primes: 19920911 22 19920911 54 19920911 282 19920911 6306 19920911 6654 19920911 17994 19920911 31102 19920911 37182 19920911 184666 |
|
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
Jul 2007
Tennessee
25×19 Posts |
k=1977 complete to n=696000
no new primes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#297 | |
|
Feb 2003
22×32×53 Posts |
Quote:
Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 16e Post Processing Progress | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 8 | 2018-11-28 13:45 |
| Sieving with powers of small primes in the Small Prime variation of the Quadratic Sieve | mickfrancis | Factoring | 2 | 2016-05-06 08:13 |
| Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5: Post Primes Here | robert44444uk | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 358 | 2008-12-08 16:28 |
| Small Primes | Housemouse | Math | 2 | 2008-06-04 05:23 |
| POST PRIMES you've found here, and name or prover code | TTn | 15k Search | 415 | 2006-03-02 21:17 |