![]() |
|
|
#188 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32×13×89 Posts |
I have tested k=115029915 from n=0 to 120K to confirm prior testing and fill 2 gaps. Below are the additional primes that were found. For ease of reference, I am listing an already found prime at the beginning and end of each gap.
Quote:
This is an outstanding performing k for its size. The 100th prime was found at n=85247 and this makes a total of 121 primes up to n=385K! k=8331405 is the only lower k on our summary site that has more total primes. More remarkable is that k=115029915 has 115 primes up to only n=156921, which is more than the 110 primes that k=8331405 had at that point. One note on this one...I suspect that there is at least a partial gap between n=156921 and 269264. According to the top-5000 site, there was over 2 years between the time that these two primes were found and it was a different person who found them. I did find a thread on this forum that shows that it may have been tested from n=210K to 269264 but I wasn't completely convinced. Regardless, I plan to test this one up to n=200K and then include it in my large sieve of multiple heavy-weights. In those efforts, all ranges will be verified and/or unknown gaps filled. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
I have now tested k=102765 up to n=250K. No more primes were found.
I am a definite dry spell on these high-weight k's in testing over n=200K. Previously posted testing of k=2145 from n=215K to 240K, k=19437 from n=215K to 250K, and now this one from n=200K to 250K all yielded no primes. ![]() Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Sep 2006
Germany
2·59 Posts |
More primes for n<=200k:
100487, 106483, 107980, 110543, 114270, 125023, 130134, 158970 Please note that 1000065*2^146+/-1 is a twin prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
#191 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
I have tested k=120023475 from n=0 to 125K to fill the gap below previously found primes and to confirm the first one already found. Below are the primes that were found.
Quote:
I plan to test this one up to n=200K and include it in my large sieve of multiple heavy-weights. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2007-08-05 at 21:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
487310 Posts |
Here are the primes I have discovered for these k's. This list begins at 1e4, since Gary has already posted the smaller primes.
2055: 10655, 11438, 26301, 26858, 35649, 38130, 44826, 61481, 77237, 81938, 90848 2085: 11190, 12065, 13556, 13775, 17963, 21559, 27536, 36460, 43238, 46654, 54318, 92568, 93450, 106978, 124759 2115: 11837, 12008, 14168, 17420, 17696, 21857, 21997, 46019, 48923, 57130, 77696 2145: 10238, 12404, 15075, 15926, 20148, 23550, 24879, 25527, 35062, 35387, 73217, 83553, 94980, 115899, 138411, 139373, 140432 2175: 11142, 13409, 14096, 14243, 24201, 31873, 36265, 38550, 38942, 57231, 64065, 74009, 76293, 83741, 84233, 93078, 106442, 107318, 128058, 136985, 159486, 162240 These lists are complete to 166k for all 5 k's. Gary has taken over testing of 2145, while the rest are reserved by me. -Curtis |
|
|
|
|
|
#193 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32×13×89 Posts |
I just got the following message from Templus. It has some additional primes to post for k=11069.
Gary Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Karsten,
I figured I should give you a status update before you go on vacation. While doing my large sieve of all my k's from n=200K to 400K, there are some side efforts going to make the sieve a less intense effort. I'm getting well-sieved files from Curtis on k=2145 and had already gotten an almost completed sieved file from Cedric on k=686701125 so I have been testing them separately, although am including the latter in my sieve for n > 250K. And on k=115029915 and 120023475, those were recent reservations so I'm working to get them up to n=200K before finishing the sieve. Here is the status and some more primes that were found: 1. k=2145; I just started back up on this one after getting another file from Curtis. From n=240K to 242K, no additional primes found. Total still 69 primes. 2. k=115029915; from n=120K to 177K; previous primes found and confirmed at n=122047, 122269, 122892, 141059, and 156921. Two additional primes found at n=161898 and 167323. Total 123 primes up to n=385K! IMPORTANT NOTE: This confirms what I said in a prior posting. There is definitely a testing gap between n=156921 and 269264 even though one is not shown. The next time you do an update, I would suggest showing your patented (..) gap notation between n=177K and 269264. (I will probably be up to n=200K by then but the same would still apply at that point.) With this huge gap in testing, it makes the prime count even more remarkable.3. k=120023475 from n=125K to 173K; previous primes found and confirmed at n=142158, 148159, and 150913. Two additional primes found at n=170384 and 172591. Total 114 primes up to my testing point; almost an even race with #2. What's even better is that previous testing took this one up to n=161.5K. So I found 2 more primes in just another 11.5K. 4. k=686701125 from n=200K to 248K; two new primes found at n=225149 and 238938. Total 121 primes; another outstanding k. Have a great vacation! Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#195 | |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
207710 Posts |
Quote:
also 3045*2^388363-1 is prime. I think k=3045 has been the 'best' reasonably small k I have found. 6 primes between 100,000 and 200,000. 5 primes between 200,000 and 300,000. 4 primes between 300,000 and 400,000. (So far.) 3 between 400,000 and 500,000 would be nice ![]() About 85 candidates per 1000 after sieving to 1.2T. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#196 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Quote:
I would probably post them in the 'post lots of primes here' thread. My thinking on that thread is that it's intended for any misc. top-5000 primes. I use this thread for non-reportable primes (which have been ALL of mine so far) unless they hit another drive like low-weight or n<300.Speaking of that, here comes a few more non-reportable primes... ![]() G Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2007-08-20 at 19:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#197 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32×13×89 Posts |
Karsten,
Here is my final status update on my 13 heavy-weights before testing my large sieve of them all at once, which will be ready to start LLRing on Wednesday 8/22. 1. k=2145; LLR complete thru n=280K. No more primes found. Total still 69 primes.Note: I think Curtis is removing all the primes before sending me his sieve files on this one! That's no more primes found (above what had been previously found) since n=180K. ![]() 2. k=115029915; LLR complete thru n=200K; one more prime at n=183984 since last status report on Aug. 9th. Total 124 primes to n=385K. Note: This further confirms the gap in prior testing. It now still has a gap from n=200K to 269264. 3. k=120023475; LLR complete thru n=200K; two more primes at n=181527 and 182241 since last status report on Aug. 9th. Total 116 primes to n=200K. 4. k=686701125; LLR complete thru n=250K; no more primes since last status report on Aug. 9th. Total 121 primes to n=250K. Note that I recently reserved k=16995, 26565, and 49335. Those will be a separate effort that will produce top-5000 primes more quickly then the above. I'm currently in the process of filling gaps in them right now. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#198 |
|
Sep 2006
Germany
11810 Posts |
More primes for n<=250k:
220897, 241662 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 16e Post Processing Progress | pinhodecarlos | NFS@Home | 8 | 2018-11-28 13:45 |
| Sieving with powers of small primes in the Small Prime variation of the Quadratic Sieve | mickfrancis | Factoring | 2 | 2016-05-06 08:13 |
| Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5: Post Primes Here | robert44444uk | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 358 | 2008-12-08 16:28 |
| Small Primes | Housemouse | Math | 2 | 2008-06-04 05:23 |
| POST PRIMES you've found here, and name or prover code | TTn | 15k Search | 415 | 2006-03-02 21:17 |