mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > New To GIMPS? Start Here! > Information & Answers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-07-23, 16:18   #1
wingman99
 
Jul 2016

11 Posts
Default How do you disable AVX in Prime95

For stress testing I would like to disable AVX.
wingman99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-23, 16:31   #2
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

32458 Posts
Default

Read undoc.txt : it contains the necessary parameters. One thing that must be added is that you have to stop prime95 before modifying the configuration files. You do not have to exit.

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-23, 20:27   #3
wingman99
 
Jul 2016

11 Posts
Default

CpuSupportsAVX=0 or 1, so 0 is off and 1 is on thanks?

Last fiddled with by wingman99 on 2016-07-23 at 20:28
wingman99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-24, 08:14   #4
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

35×7 Posts
Default

I also suppose also that if CpuSupportsXXX is 0 the support for XXX is off and if it is 1it is on.

So to spell it out you must add a line with CpuSupportsAVX=0 in the file local.txt.

If you look at the data provided by going to the Options / CPU menu you will see what features of your CPU are used.

If you are stress-testing your computer you should leave AVX on: otherwise you will not be using all the capabilities of your CPU. It would be like disabling the turbo charger of an engine before stress-testing it.

Jacob
S485122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-24, 17:31   #5
wingman99
 
Jul 2016

11 Posts
Default

Thank you for your help. I totally agree with you disabling AVX should not be done for stress testing. A person I was posting with says if your not using a AVX programs why test. I don't agree with that thinking.

There are also a lot of people in forums that if prime95 does not pass large FFTs just use small FFTs so the CPU will pass the test.

All this haphazard testing is giving Pirme95 a bad name, they blame prime95 for failing when overclocking or just testing stock and some say you don't need a 100% stable CPU depending on what you are doing?

I have been using prime95 torture testing since it came out, I still think it is better than the other stability testing programs for CPU and memory. What is the opinion here?

Last fiddled with by wingman99 on 2016-07-24 at 17:32
wingman99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-24, 21:34   #6
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

9,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingman99 View Post
What is the opinion here?
My personal opinion (one I think is widely shared here) is if a computer doesn't pass all the various Prime95/mprime torture tests, then the machine should not be trusted. It isn't stable. In fact, it was Prime95/mprime which was used by very diligent testers to prove earlier this year that Intel's new Skylake processors had a bug.

I run mprime on all machines I'm responsible for, doing Double Checks. If a machine starts returning bad results, it gets the "evil eye". I can't even guess how much money this has saved me in the past; when mprime starts returning bad results that machine should be retired / repaired ASAP.

For those who don't use machines for serious work, instability might be acceptable. A gaming machine, for example. Not my world.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-25, 08:29   #7
pepi37
 
pepi37's Avatar
 
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)

1,451 Posts
Default

But any of you must consider next thing: on forums like this forum ( but even on this forum) there is two type of persons: one type is: buy new PC, start it and forget it.
Those kind of persons, dont know, wont know, or dont need to know how PC works, and how to make PC better.
On the second hand other , second type of person will squeeze last Mhz from CPU, will take huge CPU coolers, will take fastest RAM ... and so on ....
There is problem when person of first kind have question, and person of second king answer it.
Since knowledge person of first type is too small and not adequate , problem arise :)

I personally build PC from parts I select, put it together and start prime95 / mprime for at least day or two. When I got stable machine, then I can do rest.

Last fiddled with by pepi37 on 2016-07-25 at 08:30
pepi37 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-25, 09:31   #8
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

588610 Posts
Default

I see arguments for stress testing with and without AVX. The voltage increases when AVX is in use. The extra voltage may be what is making it stable also the turbo will be higher without AVX.
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-25, 11:08   #9
VictordeHolland
 
VictordeHolland's Avatar
 
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands

23×3×72 Posts
Default

In my experience a PC will fail P95 faster with AVX/FMA enabled, due to more stress, higher voltage and higher temperatures.

If any stresstest fails in P95, than the machine is unstable and I wouldn't trust the results from that PC. You might still be able to run games and Internet browsing on the PC without it crashing. But I would try o find the issue before running any form of compute on it.
VictordeHolland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-25, 12:39   #10
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

22·5·72·11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VictordeHolland View Post
In my experience a PC will fail P95 faster with AVX/FMA enabled, due to more stress, higher voltage and higher temperatures.

If any stresstest fails in P95, than the machine is unstable and I wouldn't trust the results from that PC. You might still be able to run games and Internet browsing on the PC without it crashing. But I would try o find the issue before running any form of compute on it.
I'm half-way in this dispute.

Naturally I prefer my machines to be reliable but I also like my algorithms to be fail-soft. In my line of work, integer factorization, the principal algorithms have that behaviour. If an ECM curve very occasionally gives the wrong result, there are many more curves to try. Any one curve has only a tiny chance of finding a curve any way and losing (say) one curve in ten thousand is quite unimportant. Likewise, a NFS siever may throw out bad relations on occasion but as long as the great majority are correct, a failure rate even as high as 0.1% is quite unimportant.

Horses for courses.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-07-26, 08:01   #11
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

10110111111102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
I'm half-way in this dispute.

Naturally I prefer my machines to be reliable but I also like my algorithms to be fail-soft. In my line of work, integer factorization, the principal algorithms have that behaviour. If an ECM curve very occasionally gives the wrong result, there are many more curves to try. Any one curve has only a tiny chance of finding a curve any way and losing (say) one curve in ten thousand is quite unimportant. Likewise, a NFS siever may throw out bad relations on occasion but as long as the great majority are correct, a failure rate even as high as 0.1% is quite unimportant.

Horses for courses.
Yes but NFS post-processing needs rock stable memory.
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it possible to disable benchmarking while torture tests are running? ZFR Software 4 2018-02-02 20:18
Disable prime95 during the day roelvz Software 10 2016-02-23 13:19
Disable sending expected completion date? Xyzzy PrimeNet 1 2009-04-24 07:50
Disable Ctrl Alt Delete Task Manager TTn Programming 31 2005-12-31 12:56
How to disable an unused computer? romanhoehne PrimeNet 1 2004-05-06 13:00

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:29.


Sun Aug 1 17:29:47 UTC 2021 up 9 days, 11:58, 0 users, load averages: 1.46, 1.39, 1.31

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.