mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > New To GIMPS? Start Here! > Information & Answers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-05-13, 00:15   #1
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

112·17 Posts
Default The "Beautiful" Formula

Hi,
Can someone please decipher the following "beautiful" formula for me?

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Recipro...lConstant.html


m(3)=1/3!!!!!+?+?+.....
* What's the next/previous addend in the series sum?

Thanks in advance.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 01:19   #2
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

112×17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
Hi,
Can someone please decipher the following "beautiful" formula for me?

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Recipro...lConstant.html


m(3)=1/3!!!!!+?+?+.....
* What's the next/previous addend in the series sum?

Thanks in advance.
ETA
I just realized that I put an example with too many Exclamation marks for n=3.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 08:00   #3
Nick
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Dec 2012
The Netherlands

2·853 Posts
Default

I assume that they mean this (in your example):

\[m(3)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3!}+\frac{1}{3!!}+\frac{1}{3!!!}+\ldots\]
Nick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 19:59   #4
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

112·17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
I assume that they mean this (in your example):

\[m(3)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3!}+\frac{1}{3!!}+\frac{1}{3!!!}+\ldots\]
Thank you for the reply Nick,
So it should be k=0 rather than n=0 then.
Can't wrap my head around what happens when the Exclamation marks exceed n.
ETA
And k=0 is undefined, or is a multifactorial with 0 exclamation marks just n?

Last fiddled with by a1call on 2016-05-13 at 20:08
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 21:36   #5
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

28×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
Can't wrap my head around what happens when the Exclamation marks exceed n.
Perhaps you should read the definition of multifactorial:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html

The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 22:32   #6
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

112×17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Perhaps you should read the definition of multifactorial:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html

The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment.
Thank you VBCurtis,
So the only question marks remaining is:
* What is the definition of a multifactorial of n with 0 exclamation marks
* Does the "beautiful" formula has a typo showing n=0 (to my poor vision) instead of k=0 or while we are at it k=1

I appreciate your clarification VBCurtis

Last fiddled with by a1call on 2016-05-13 at 22:32
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 22:46   #7
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Perhaps you should read the definition of multifactorial:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html

The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment.
I think the problem is that the first part of the ink he gave says m(n) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty ... where what's being summed contains a value k not given and n is an input then varies.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 22:51   #8
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

112·17 Posts
Default

If this code is complete and all inclusive:

Code:
fac(n,d)=prod(k=0,(n-1)\d,n-k*d);\\Multifactorial\\Credits: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multifactorial#PARI.2FGP

fac(19,0)

Code:
  ***   at top-level: fac(19,0)
  ***                 ^---------
  ***   in function fac: prod(k=0,(n-1)\d,n-k*d)
  ***                                  ^---------
  *** _\_: impossible inverse in sdivsi_rem: 0.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 23:21   #9
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

10011000000002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
* What is the definition of a multifactorial of n with 0 exclamation marks
Are you really asking what "n" means? An "n" without a factorial symbol would be... n.

Also: what is 0! defined as? If you don't know, look it up.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-13, 23:54   #10
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

1000000010012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Are you really asking what "n" means? An "n" without a factorial symbol would be... n.
Well a n would be out of phase in the sequence/series:

n=19
--------

n=19
n!=121645100408832000
n!!=654729075
n!!!=1106560
n!!!!=65835
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-05-14, 00:30   #11
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
Well a n would be out of phase
ah but if you define the value with 0 factorials behind it the same way as say n!:

n! = n*(n-1)*(n-2)... *2*1
n!! = n*(n-2)*(n-4)....

then continuing downward:
n = n*(n-0)*(n-2*0) you run into the problem that no matter how many times you subtract 0 you won't hit the negative numbers so is it n^oo ? that's what it would need to be to fit into the rest of the values.

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-05-14 at 00:31
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 5 2016-10-22 01:55
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" wildrabbitt Miscellaneous Math 11 2015-03-06 08:17
"prime numbers formula" crankery Mini-Geek Miscellaneous Math 12 2009-03-04 16:51
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? nitai1999 Software 7 2004-08-26 18:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:07.


Tue Jul 27 10:07:58 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 4:36, 0 users, load averages: 2.58, 2.19, 2.02

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.