![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
112·17 Posts |
Hi,
Can someone please decipher the following "beautiful" formula for me? http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Recipro...lConstant.html m(3)=1/3!!!!!+?+?+..... * What's the next/previous addend in the series sum? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
112×17 Posts |
Quote:
I just realized that I put an example with too many Exclamation marks for n=3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Dec 2012
The Netherlands
2·853 Posts |
I assume that they mean this (in your example):
\[m(3)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3!}+\frac{1}{3!!}+\frac{1}{3!!!}+\ldots\] |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
112·17 Posts |
Quote:
So it should be k=0 rather than n=0 then. Can't wrap my head around what happens when the Exclamation marks exceed n. ETA And k=0 is undefined, or is a multifactorial with 0 exclamation marks just n? Last fiddled with by a1call on 2016-05-13 at 20:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
28×19 Posts |
Quote:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
112×17 Posts |
Quote:
So the only question marks remaining is: * What is the definition of a multifactorial of n with 0 exclamation marks * Does the "beautiful" formula has a typo showing n=0 (to my poor vision) instead of k=0 or while we are at it k=1 I appreciate your clarification VBCurtis
Last fiddled with by a1call on 2016-05-13 at 22:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26×131 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
112·17 Posts |
If this code is complete and all inclusive:
Code:
fac(n,d)=prod(k=0,(n-1)\d,n-k*d);\\Multifactorial\\Credits: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multifactorial#PARI.2FGP fac(19,0) Code:
*** at top-level: fac(19,0) *** ^--------- *** in function fac: prod(k=0,(n-1)\d,n-k*d) *** ^--------- *** _\_: impossible inverse in sdivsi_rem: 0. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
10011000000002 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
1000000010012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26·131 Posts |
ah but if you define the value with 0 factorials behind it the same way as say n!:
n! = n*(n-1)*(n-2)... *2*1 n!! = n*(n-2)*(n-4).... then continuing downward: n = n*(n-0)*(n-2*0) you run into the problem that no matter how many times you subtract 0 you won't hit the negative numbers so is it n^oo ? that's what it would need to be to fit into the rest of the values. Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-05-14 at 00:31 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" | wildrabbitt | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2015-03-06 08:17 |
| "prime numbers formula" crankery | Mini-Geek | Miscellaneous Math | 12 | 2009-03-04 16:51 |
| Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |