Carol / Kynea Coordinated Search - Reservations - Page 12

gd_barnes · 2018-01-25, 06:55

Reserving base 22 to n=30K.

I will doublecheck it to n=22K

gd_barnes · 2018-01-27, 22:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweety439

Don't forget, the bases b<38 include bases 4, 8, 16, 32 and 36, although they are not shown in the webpage.

I did not forget them. The prime gap that I pointed out for b=34 is still the largest for b<38 and n<=30K. This includes both sides combined for each base.

rogue · 2018-01-30, 03:52

206, 208, 210, and 212 reserved Jiahao He via e-mail

gd_barnes · 2018-01-30, 20:39

Base 22 is complete to n=30K. No primes were found for n=22K-30K.

Base 22 was also doublechecked to n=22K. No problems found.

All bases <= 40 are now complete to n>=30K.

gd_barnes · 2018-01-30, 20:42

Base 26 was doublechecked to n=30K. No problems found.

Doublecheck status:
Base 22 to n=22K.
Base 26 to n=30K.
Base 34 to n=10K.
All other bases shown on primes page to n=2500.

gd_barnes · 2018-02-05, 16:12

Reserving base 42 to n=30K.

I will doublecheck it to n=10K.

gd_barnes · 2018-02-13, 16:30

Base 42 is complete to n=30K. 2 primes were found for n=10K-30K. Base released.

Base 42 and 44 were also doublechecked to n=10K. No problems found.

gd_barnes · 2018-02-13, 16:32

Reserving base 46 to n=30K.

I will doublecheck it to n=10K.

Reserving base 2026 to n=10K.

I will doublecheck it to n=5526.

Filling in the search holes.

rogue · 2018-02-13, 23:29

Gary has graciously taken over the coordination of this search. Please go to this page to view the current status.

gd_barnes · 2018-02-14, 05:33

Base 2026 is complete to n=10K. No primes were found for n=5527-10K.

Base 2026 was also doublechecked to n=5526. No problems found.

LaurV · 2018-02-14, 10:16

I was looking to those tables and saw that after 222 or so, the bases are not contiguous. I assume there is no search done for the missing bases, and the "higher" values just come from "people with a hobby" and not from an organized search. Because, unless I am not missing anything, I see no reason why the missing bases would not give primes. I think they do, and it should be no reason to jump from 222 to 228 (therefore missing 224 and 226) or from 2010 to 2026.

Now, the introduction done, for a week or so we were looking for an opportunity to test the new "multi-threaded" tool from Mark (i.e. mtsieve). We picked CK numbers, and we picked the base 2018. As the current year, you know? We could not make the toy run in multi-threaded mode (this is subject for another thread), but we got hooked

and let it run overnight to sieve (single thread) and test with pfgw with some batch file. In the morning we had few (small) primes, and pfgw was close to testing n=12k or so.

Does it make any sense reporting it? Or we are really missing the point (again, it won't be the first time, hehe).

2018-02-13, 23:29	#130
rogue "Mark" Apr 2003 Between here and the 11·577 Posts	Gary has graciously taken over the coordination of this search. Please go to this page to view the current status. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2018-02-21 at 20:39 Reason: correct link

2018-02-14, 10:16	#132
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 7×1,373 Posts	I was looking to those tables and saw that after 222 or so, the bases are not contiguous. I assume there is no search done for the missing bases, and the "higher" values just come from "people with a hobby" and not from an organized search. Because, unless I am not missing anything, I see no reason why the missing bases would not give primes. I think they do, and it should be no reason to jump from 222 to 228 (therefore missing 224 and 226) or from 2010 to 2026. Now, the introduction done, for a week or so we were looking for an opportunity to test the new "multi-threaded" tool from Mark (i.e. mtsieve). We picked CK numbers, and we picked the base 2018. As the current year, you know? We could not make the toy run in multi-threaded mode (this is subject for another thread), but we got hooked and let it run overnight to sieve (single thread) and test with pfgw with some batch file. In the morning we had few (small) primes, and pfgw was close to testing n=12k or so. Does it make any sense reporting it? Or we are really missing the point (again, it won't be the first time, hehe). Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2018-02-14 at 10:18

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Carol / Kynea Primes	rogue	And now for something completely different	249	2021-05-19 12:14
Carol / Kynea search (Near-power primes)	rogue	And now for something completely different	37	2016-06-18 17:58
a 18+ Christmas carol	science_man_88	Lounge	10	2010-12-13 23:26
Old reservations	opyrt	Prime Sierpinski Project	3	2009-03-26 19:51
k=51 or about coordinated prime search	Kosmaj	Riesel Prime Search	7	2007-07-13 22:15

2018-01-25, 06:55	#122
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³·5·7·11 Posts	Reserving base 22 to n=30K. I will doublecheck it to n=22K

2018-01-30, 03:52	#124
rogue "Mark" Apr 2003 Between here and the 1100011001011₂ Posts	206, 208, 210, and 212 reserved Jiahao He via e-mail

2018-01-30, 20:39	#125
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	Base 22 is complete to n=30K. No primes were found for n=22K-30K. Base 22 was also doublechecked to n=22K. No problems found. All bases <= 40 are now complete to n>=30K.

2018-01-30, 20:42	#126
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	Base 26 was doublechecked to n=30K. No problems found. Doublecheck status: Base 22 to n=22K. Base 26 to n=30K. Base 34 to n=10K. All other bases shown on primes page to n=2500.

2018-02-05, 16:12	#127
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 10100010011011₂ Posts	Reserving base 42 to n=30K. I will doublecheck it to n=10K.

2018-02-13, 16:30	#128
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 24233₈ Posts	Base 42 is complete to n=30K. 2 primes were found for n=10K-30K. Base released. Base 42 and 44 were also doublechecked to n=10K. No problems found.

2018-02-13, 16:32	#129
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 10395₁₀ Posts	Reserving base 46 to n=30K. I will doublecheck it to n=10K. Reserving base 2026 to n=10K. I will doublecheck it to n=5526. Filling in the search holes.

2018-02-14, 05:33	#131
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³·5·7·11 Posts	Base 2026 is complete to n=10K. No primes were found for n=5527-10K. Base 2026 was also doublechecked to n=5526. No problems found.