![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus
2·89 Posts |
Is it possible to do P1 on non-x86 architecture (something like mLucas)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5·937 Posts |
What is "P1"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus
2·89 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5×937 Posts |
Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2016-03-13 at 20:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus
2·89 Posts |
Quote:
PFactor=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA,1,2,333001717,-1,76,2 ???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5·937 Posts |
If it is not using FFT arithmetic it is hopeless
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus
2×89 Posts |
Sorry. Did not understand you. So P-1 factoring for M333001717 possible in mprime and cudapm (GPU version for nVidia card). Implemintation for another architecture (Linux on ARM, Power, SPARC etc.) does not exist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
111158 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2016-03-15 at 17:19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
10011000000012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
267548 Posts |
I intend to add p-1 support to a not-too-distant Mlucas release, but no specific timeline. Key sticking point is a subquadratic gcd - I could just go with an off-the-shelf implementation of such, but have been putting in place my own implementation of such over the past couple years, and prefer to finish that work. That will avoid 3rd-part library dependencies and also allow me to compare/improve my own code versus GMP's and George's tuned-up version of the Crandall giants.c subquadratic gcd used in prime95, which is interesting from a research angle.
I actually had a working FFT-mul-based p-1 algo in the old days of Mlucas-fortran which used a highly-tuned int64-based quadratic gcd, but that was before the M-numbers being tested got so large that the timings for using said gcd started going up into many hours, as opposed to the few minutes a good subquadratic gcd needs. Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2016-03-15 at 21:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Aug 2010
Republic of Belarus
2×89 Posts |
Quote:
So it means that is one way to use mainframe or POWER ... and this way is double check jobs. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Mill CPU architecture | ewmayer | Hardware | 5 | 2014-05-03 19:58 |
| Optimizing for CPU architecture: unknown Intel | almostfrugal | Information & Answers | 1 | 2012-09-19 14:22 |
| RIP 32 bit architecture... | chalsall | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2010-09-27 19:18 |