mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-02-11, 19:21   #1
Fred
 
Fred's Avatar
 
"Ron"
Jan 2016
Fitchburg, MA

97 Posts
Default PicoPSU Review

I know George was looking at PicoPSUs, and I'm guessing others would find this info helpful. I just ordered one to try out (http://www.mini-box.com/picoPSU-120-102W-power-kit).

I'm starting to build mini-ITX systems just for prime hunting. My goal in trying the PicoPSU was 2 fold. 1) smaller footprint then a traditional PSU (building a case-less rack), and 2) I hoped perhaps it may save a bit on power consumption over a traditional PSU.

Result: The power brick is pretty big. It has a longer but narrower footprint than a traditional PSU. Not sure it really is any smaller of a footprint. No fan on it obviously, but I think most traditional quality PSU's now a days have pretty quiet, almost silent fans. I measured my current setup (i5-6500, 2x4gb DDR4-1600, mini-ITX mobo) with a Kill A Watt using both a traditional PSU (Corsair CX430M 80+Bronze), as well as on the PicoPSU. Had Prime95 running full tilt for both tests.

Corsair CX430M 80+Bronze: 71.5 Watts (average)
PicoPSU: 70.1 Watts (average)

Corsair was $24.99 after mail in rebate. PicoPSU was $53.25 (including a needed adapter cable).

All in all, PicoPSU seems well constructed (although lots of exposed components), but for my money, I think I'm going to stick with traditional PSUs.
Fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-11, 20:05   #2
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
https://pedan.tech/

318410 Posts
Default

Well that's good to know. I wasn't able to find anything about their efficiency: looks like it's okay, not great.

So getting an 80+ Platinum still looks to be the way to go for number crunching machines.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-11, 21:39   #3
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

17×487 Posts
Default

Thanks for the review. I am a couple of days away from ordering one (powered by a traditional PSU). Glad to know that it works.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-11, 22:08   #4
Fred
 
Fred's Avatar
 
"Ron"
Jan 2016
Fitchburg, MA

97 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
Well that's good to know. I wasn't able to find anything about their efficiency: looks like it's okay, not great.

So getting an 80+ Platinum still looks to be the way to go for number crunching machines.
Ya, I'm curious to know in real world applications how much better an 80+ platinum would be over 80+ or 80+Bronze. Any thoughts on that? For example, a system that draws about 71 watts on an 80+Bronze. Any idea how many watts would be saved with a Platinum?
Fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-11, 22:49   #5
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

236568 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
Ya, I'm curious to know in real world applications how much better an 80+ platinum would be over 80+ or 80+Bronze. Any thoughts on that? For example, a system that draws about 71 watts on an 80+Bronze. Any idea how many watts would be saved with a Platinum?
I would guess between 5-10%. I don't have solid numbers, now, but when I changed from a Bronze supply, to a Gold, the drop at the mains was substantial. Changing from Gold to Platinum was noticeable, but not as great.

I should note that the PSUs mentioned above were 750 W Bronze, 1000 W Gold, 1200 W Platinum. The 750 was overloaded with two GPUs (a GTX 460 and a GTX 570.) Going to the 1000 W put the power draw more in the 80% of the PSU capacity. This certainly added to the efficiency increase.

When the KW supply went crazy, (now with 2x GTX 580s,) stepping up to 1.2 KW put the total draw (800+ W), in a sweet spot for efficiency: ~66% of supply capacity.

I realize that this is in a very different part of the PSU field, but I strongly endorse higher 80+ ratings, as well as scaling your power supply to have some headroom. Running them flat out is less efficient.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2016-02-11 at 22:50 Reason: s
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-12, 02:34   #6
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
https://pedan.tech/

1100011100002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
Ya, I'm curious to know in real world applications how much better an 80+ platinum would be over 80+ or 80+Bronze. Any thoughts on that? For example, a system that draws about 71 watts on an 80+Bronze. Any idea how many watts would be saved with a Platinum?
A Bronze is fine for a machine that idles. The additional cost to buy a Platinum is paid for in savings in months to a year, when running a machine hard. The Titaniums are still crazy expensive.

Bronze should get you above 82 to 85% efficiency depending on load. A platinum should get you 90 to 92%. So that's about an 8% savings in watts, or 5 watts in your system. A watt is roughly $1/year in most places. So I would stick with your bronze unit.

Where it really matters is when running GPUs. I have a 750 watt bronze supply powering two GTX 580's and a Haswell, all running full tilt. It pulls 760 watts at the wall. I would save about 54 watts upgrading to a platinum unit. That machine gets free electricity at the moment, but if I had to pay for electricity, I would certainly have a platinum supply in it.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-12, 16:05   #7
Fred
 
Fred's Avatar
 
"Ron"
Jan 2016
Fitchburg, MA

97 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kladner View Post
I would guess between 5-10%. I don't have solid numbers, now, but when I changed from a Bronze supply, to a Gold, the drop at the mains was substantial. Changing from Gold to Platinum was noticeable, but not as great.
Hmmmm... ya, the difference I'm guessing may less drastic at lower watts, but I can see how the Platinums would definitely make sense on something running heavy duty GPUs.

The systems I'm looking to run flat out 24/7 will draw about 70 watts at the wall (with an 80+Bronze). Basically just a mini-ITX mobo with an i5-6500. Even if I noticed a full 10% savings by going to Platinum, that would be about 7 watts saved, which for me is about $11 per year. The Platinum would cost me about $55 more up front, so I would be looking at 5 years just to break even.
Fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-02-12, 16:19   #8
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

21D316 Posts
Default

There are ways to run more than one motherboard off of one power supply.

We have never done it, but we are aware the possibility exists.

Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTX 1070 8gb review firejuggler GPU Computing 29 2016-11-15 19:16
Movie review: Gravity cheesehead Lounge 6 2014-04-12 19:01
Review of Odd Perfect Paper wblipp Math 49 2012-02-12 11:43
Review of calculus/ODE Primeinator Analysis & Analytic Number Theory 15 2011-01-12 23:05
Book Review Numbers Lounge 5 2005-09-30 17:53

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:35.


Fri Jul 7 16:35:13 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 14:03, 1 user, load averages: 2.64, 2.36, 2.03

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔