![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,739 Posts |
I have extended the nub of this thread a little further, but it still seems to be computationally useless.
For example b = 3 and p = 61 so that mp = 2^61 - 1, I ran this: Code:
? p=61;mp=2^p-1;D=mp-1;V=factor(D,1000000);forbigdiv(D,d -> r=lift(Mod(3,mp)^(D/d));if(2^logint(r,2)==r,print(">>>"d)))
>>>1
>>>61
>>>3
>>>183
>>>9
>>>549
This means 3^((mp-1)/549) == 2^n for some n OR 3^4200078341008550 == 2^n for some n, thus implying M61 is prime. I will experiment with other bases b, for example p ...
Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2016-08-01 at 23:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26·131 Posts |
is your intent for D/d to get the largest one's out of the way first as D/2 will be the biggest exponent and will also be a divisor of D.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-08-01 at 23:46 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
1110100110112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it faster to run 1 worker or many? | arbiter21 | Information & Answers | 17 | 2016-02-05 05:04 |
| My CPU is getting faster and faster ;-) | lidocorc | Software | 2 | 2008-11-08 09:26 |
| 3-PRP faster than LL for GIMPS? | bearnol | Math | 35 | 2005-10-12 14:33 |
| Faster way to do LLT? | 1260 | Miscellaneous Math | 23 | 2005-09-04 07:12 |
| Faster than LL? | clowns789 | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2004-05-27 23:39 |