![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
3×3,221 Posts |
Quote:
Luigi: If you need the best price/performance compromise, Skylake is the way to go. If you don't mind paying more, but having a really performant top computer, then Haswell-E is the way to go. Thinking "for the future" is not the right way to go now, like when you said "I will end up again having an old CPU", that is not true. The actual skylakes and the future skylakes will have different features, like more memory bandwidth, etc, which means more pins, a different socket, you don't suppose that the "big skylake" will stay on 1151 pins socket, do you? Look how other older architectures evolved, not only intel, but also nvidia, etc. The "big chip" come later, when the lessons are learned, and it is not compatible with your old mobo. So, you have to chose between "ending up again with an old Hasswell-E CPU" and "ending up again with an old Skylake CPU". Don't ask me which one I would chose, money aside. Of course, as George said, only you can decide if it worth the additional cost. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2016-01-25 at 05:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
61×79 Posts |
Here we go for the second round...
Open questions:
Thank you for sharing your ideas with me
Last fiddled with by ET_ on 2016-01-25 at 13:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
The rumour is that Skylake Xeon (and hence Skylake-E) will roll out with six-channel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
61268 Posts |
Quote:
![]() I need to start saving up for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
12D316 Posts |
Quote:
MW70-3S0 Adding a couple of E5-2699 v3 18 physical cores processors for $7,600 Last fiddled with by ET_ on 2016-01-25 at 17:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
1100111100012 Posts |
Quote:
Of course mine is a dual 14-core and I think AirSquirrels has a dual 16-core. You pay a HUGE premium for the CPUs with the most cores, but if you look at clock speeds you can probably swing a good deal by figuring out the cost versus cores*GHz. I did M49 in 34 hours, and I think AirSquirrels was able to do it in < 33 hours or something. I only managed to get it running on 20 cores of the 28 total... the memory bandwidth seemed to limit it (or even impact performance negatively) when I went past 14 cores on one and 6 cores on the other socket. But then the 14-core runs at 2.6 GHz (plus 5x133 turbo), and the 16-core (I assume the E5-2698 model) is 2.3 GHz (plus 5x133 turbo). So maybe the slightly slower CPU kept the memory from flooding? Anyway, still really fast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
11001000110002 Posts |
I have a reasonably serious intention to replace my current 48-core Opteron server with a dual 12-core Skylake Xeon box in 2017; but this year that intention reifies itself in putting a few hundred pounds a month into an optimistically-named account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
27AE16 Posts |
Quote:
I attempted a more modest approach, with mere 8-core, 2.4G CPUs. Two of these, plus one of these comes to USD 2030, at Newegg ATM.I then added USD 4160 for two 128 G quad-channel sets. Total: 6190 usd, and still no case or PSU. That could be brought down by different CPUs and RAM, of course. Last fiddled with by kladner on 2016-01-25 at 19:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Jul 2003
13·47 Posts |
hi,
i do recommend for a hdu Western Digital Re Enterprise Capacity 2TB, SATA 6Gb/s (WD2004FBYZ) around € 160,- Western Digital Se 2TB, SATA 6Gb/s (WD2000F9YZ) around € 130,- |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
|
|
|
|