![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006
22348 Posts |
The poll for move 17 just closed, and the most popular move was Qd4. Stockfish responded with 17...Qb6, and the FEN is:
r5k1/pp2rp1p/1q3p2/3p4/2nQ4/1N3P2/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - 2 18 Game so far: 1.e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 c5 4. Ngf3 Nf6 5. exd5 exd5 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. Bxd7+ Nbxd7 8. O-O Be7 9. dxc5 Nxc5 10. Nb3 Nce4 11. Nfd4 O-O 12. Nf5 Re8 13. Nxe7+ Rxe7 14. f3 Nd6 15. Bg5 Nc4 16. Bxf6 gxf6 17. Qd4 Qb6 Last fiddled with by MooMoo2 on 2016-01-23 at 06:27 Reason: fixed FEN |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
327810 Posts |
Our b pawn is attacked once again and Black is also threatening to invade with a rook on e2. But perhaps we can hope for an endgame where Black's pawn weaknesses start to tell.
18.Qxb6 axb6 doesn't look like a very good idea to me at the moment. Black's pressure against our queenside pawns will be just too strong, and we lose at least a pawn, I think, while the black rooks look like invading as well. 18.Rfb1 is far too ugly to look worth considering, I think. But 18.Rab1 Qxd4 19.Nxd4 (and if 19...Nd2 20.Rfe1) looks okay to me at the moment. Other moves seem to lose the b pawn at once, or worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33×19 Posts |
The only move I see is 18.Rab1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
100001000011012 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-01-23 at 16:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
240638 Posts |
Anything wrong with taking the queen? We started to simplify already,
![]() He either beats with the horse and lose all the threats there, or beats with the pawn (as I said few moves ago, beating with the pawn is most probable, this keeps the threats of the knight, and opens the threat on column "a", with the rook) and he has a terrible structure of the pawns, two times doubles. So: 18: Qxb6, axb6 19. Rfd1 - let him take the pawn, we take d5 etc. His pawns are really placed very ugly now. I go to sleep, 1:35AM here... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2016-01-23 at 18:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
Quote:
After your suggested 18.Qxb6 axb6 19.Rfd1 Black has 19...Re2 with the horrible threat of ...Ne3 (hitting g2) as well as ...Rxc2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
5×2,459 Posts |
I don't have a lot of time to look at this but I am confident in this analysis:
Rab1 is bad. It's way too defensive. I completely agree with LaurV (as usual). Let SF take the pawn. We would have excellent counter attacks on his d pawn and we could come behind his knight on b2 with a rook with Rab1 and ultimately pluck away his b pawns.As stated by LaurV, we are in very good shape here with: 18. Qxb6 axb6 19. Rfd1 His horrible pawn structure will hurt him bad in the end game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
It looks like we may well fail to reach a general consensus for this move, in which case the voting will decide it.
My take is that we have no chance of middlegame activity once the queens are off the board, sacrificing pawns doesn't look to me like changing that, and our b pawn needs protection. Secondly, I think we should let Black do the exchanging of queens. If Black exchanges, our knight reaches d4 (protecting the invasion square e2) without loss of tempo. If Black ducks the exchange we have chances of initiative against Black's wide open castled king. Whereas if we exchange then we have invasion down the a file to contend with as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
8,461 Posts |
which currently has if the queen isn't taken and able to move ( which currently it can't because it got us pinned to protect the king trying to protect the pawn. not to mention it could be with Rab1 but you insist on not really doing either,because keeping the queen there without exchange is what's currently protecting the b pawn, once their queen captures ours if we accept the exchange with Nxd4, Nxb2 can happen without defense. so really none of the plans you listed protect it long term and the line you suggested earlier lands us with capturing the knight or the rook but not both so in theory their king can either chase our rook for a little bit while we better it's pawn structure or we can take the knight out and leave us open to attack from the rook. either way we lose control if we can even say we have any now.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-01-24 at 15:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
Quote:
Protection of our c and g pawns (and possibly unpinning our queen if Black leaves the queens on the board) would come from our later move Rf2. I agree with the latter part of your posting insofar as I think that we are already in trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
846110 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-01-24 at 16:04 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish-assisted game vs Stockfish, move 8 discussion | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 11 | 2016-10-21 15:47 |
| Move 33 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 8 | 2016-04-23 14:07 |
| Move 30 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 2 | 2016-04-03 19:55 |
| Move 29 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 8 | 2016-03-29 10:27 |
| Move 5 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2015-11-13 13:39 |