![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Jun 2003
23×683 Posts |
An advantage of Be3 is that it would keep is in the book for a little while longer. Out of the 18 games available in this position (@ database.chessbase.com), 13 have gone with Be3, 3 with f3, 1 each with Nd4 and Re1.
What about moves like c3 and Nd4? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006
22×5×59 Posts |
Quote:
Stats: Code:
Move No. Depth (ply) Nodes Searched 1 34 2,754,754,703 2 35 2,775,255,936 3 37 7,823,890,345 4 36 4,748,231,994 5 34 3,046,969,375 6 35 1,707,757,893 7 36 1,800,523,731 8 37 4,257,172,692 9 37 3,632,048,539 10 36 5,122,109,377 11 35 2,971,667,745 12 36 8,759,943,111 13 35 3,408,909,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
283316 Posts |
Quote:
, I think the forced way is the best way. Few moves ago I was talking about black Rxe7, actually at that time it was a "hope", or "pray for it", because I was more afraid of Qxe7. Right now, this works in our advantage, because black didn't double the Q+R on the e7/e8 column, so we can play Re1 and force the exchange, if we want to play for a draw. So, 14.f3 Nd6 (forced), 15. Bg5 (links the horse, if not Re8, we exchange and uncover black king, very convenient for us to give back the bishop's advantage) Re8 (forced, as explained), then 16 Re1, Rxe1 17 Qxe1. Here few more pieces eliminated, and we are still strong on board. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-12-30 at 11:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
100001000011012 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2015-12-30 at 12:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
CCE16 Posts |
Quote:
The above argument is my contribution for prefering 14.Be3 over 14.f3. The other moves which axn mentions, 14.Nd4, 14.Re1, 14.c3, are all playable I think. But I give 14.Be3 the preference on the grounds that I would like us to get this final minor piece developed now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
8,461 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2015-12-30 at 13:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41×251 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
8,461 Posts |
my point was that you said it was forced at a certain move number and technically it can all be avoided with a sac Ng3 and then if we accept the queen on the other side possibility ( possibility only because of a potential capture ruining it for them) if we don't and play wrong game over because g3 attacks the retreat square and even on the other side re1 won't really save us if we don't capture Ng4 it will only draw the game out more by one move each.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2015-12-30 at 15:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41×251 Posts |
Well, "forced" was more along the line "wherever else he puts the horse, it is lost", and not that black can not do any moves. He can move the king, and let the horse for us to take, if he likes
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-12-30 at 16:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dartmouth NS
8,461 Posts |
he's still not forced to do it immediately because he can put us in check and use that loss of tempo on our part to move it while developing pieces. it's also potentially possible for the two of his knights to work together to get a king queen fork.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2015-12-30 at 16:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
10018 Posts |
I'm for Be3 since it prevents Black playing Qb6, prepares f3 and adds the possibility controling the center with either of our minor pieces. I also expect the reply to be the same as what SF played before.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish-assisted game vs Stockfish, move 8 discussion | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 11 | 2016-10-21 15:47 |
| Move 33 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 8 | 2016-04-23 14:07 |
| Move 30 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 2 | 2016-04-03 19:55 |
| Move 29 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 8 | 2016-03-29 10:27 |
| Move 5 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2015-11-13 13:39 |