![]() |
|
|
#342 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
There we go,
R213 is done (p=30e12) and attached. Reserving R321 for n=200K-500K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#343 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
R321 is done (P=30e12), file attached.
Reserving S68 for n=1-3M. |
|
|
|
|
|
#344 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
S411 reached p=7,5T, file attached.
Reserving R102 from n=200K-500K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#345 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
S68 reached p=100T, file attached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#346 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
R46 reached p=30e12, file attached.
Reserving R1027 from n=100K-250K. |
|
|
|
|
|
#347 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101011012 Posts |
There is a link to a sieve file for S27 for n=1.211M-2M that is sieved to only P=7.5T. P=7.5T is way too low even for BOINC.
Recommendation: Continue sieving this file to a minimum of P=100T. Test times for this file are so long that P=300T or higher would be better but P=100T is a good starting point. Sieved enough, we could use the S27 file for loading into our port 1300 for a PRPnet team effort. The port currently has R23 loaded into it and will likely be finished within a month. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2017-09-19 at 05:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
#348 | |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
Quote:
For PRPnet we could use S17 or S22 as well, booth sieved up to 100T. Last fiddled with by MisterBitcoin on 2017-09-19 at 14:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
114118 Posts |
I stopped R27 a month or so ago, because Rebirther put R27 on BOINC with the old sieve file and told me he wasn't willing to restart the job using my sieve (at 90T rather than 30T).
The only sieve I run for public consumption is R3, and after the R27 experience that's not likely to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
#350 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
1041310 Posts |
Quote:
We will choose something different for PRPnet. Edit: Because of (now) two different people's experience with trying to sieve under-sieved files when BOINC reserves them in the middle of such efforts, I have decided to no longer accept well under-sieved files for posting on the pages. The original idea behind posting under-sieved files on the pages is that they would be a starting point for people to continue sieving before beginning testing. That is not working out very well. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2017-09-19 at 18:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#351 | |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
Quote:
Sofar I know PG is using sieve apps for there searches, may that something for SRBase as well? (I talked about that with reb for k-rich bases like 66, but not for single-k.) I´m nearly alone making sieve files (+Curtis with R3 and wombatman) and will focus on bases up to nmax=25K/100K/250K/500K. Taking a single-k base up to 200T or more will took ~4-6 months (depending on resources.) Don´t get me wrong, I can understand the background. If the base would be taken by reb, it´s not that bad instead of user who has to sieve first. How many factors will we find in 100T-250T? [Theory]Maybe 100-200, which is not sooo much for BOINC. It take a few days more for SRBase, but months for sieving.[/Theory] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#352 | |
|
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
13·137 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sieving Drive all base 2/4 k's worked by CRUS | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 143 | 2014-10-21 23:55 |
| Some CRUS stats | vmod | Conjectures 'R Us | 213 | 2014-02-28 21:23 |
| What are your CRUS plans? | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 35 | 2013-11-09 09:03 |
| CRUS-like sieving challenge | CRGreathouse | Puzzles | 24 | 2011-10-28 18:30 |
| how high will CRUS go | Mini-Geek | Conjectures 'R Us | 1 | 2010-11-08 20:50 |