![]() |
|
|
#155 | |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
28×19 Posts |
Quote:
srsieve is used to create the file and do initial sieving. Once you reach 1e9, use sr2sieve for most bases (a base with 1-3 k's remaining may be faster with sr1sieve on each k individually rather than sr2 on all of them at once). The flags needed for invocation of the programs can be learned via "srsieve -h" etc, or surely there's a thread detailing exact invocation here in this forum. sr2sieve can be multi-threaded with -t 4 flag (for 4 threads); this allows modern machinery to run a sieve pretty quickly. For example, I think I spent about a month on an older 4-core Intel chip to sieve R327 earlier this fall to 80T or so, sufficient for testing the first part of the file. In general, it's not very efficient to sieve ranges smaller than a factor of two (say, 2M-3M). [Soapbox not necessarily shared by the regulars in this forum:] 200k-500k is more efficient than 200-400k, but a too-large range (say 200k to 5M) is a waste of work because any prime found removes that k from the testing pool, "wasting" all the sieve computations for that k above the prime. I personally choose the range of exponents such that 1/3rd or less of the k's are expected to prime when testing the file; a factor of 3-5 usually fits this concept (say, 200k to 1M or 300k to 1M). It's not a big deal, but the way I see it a 10% gain in efficiency is equivalent to a free 10% overclock, and I go to great lengths to achieve those! [/Soapbox] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 | |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
114008 Posts |
Quote:
You don't need to run a full primality test of such a candidate to get this timing; you can run a few minutes of the test for iteration timings and multiply by the number of iterations needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 | |
|
Jul 2003
13×47 Posts |
Quote:
in the case you are using linux x64 an example for S476, k=28, n=200k to 400k you could start with ./srsieve-x86_64-linux --newpgen --nmin 200000 --nmax 400000 --pmax 20e9 28*476^n+1 this will take about 30 minutes take the output file t16_b476_k28.npg as an input file for sr1sieve ./sr1sieve-x86_64-linux -i t16_b476_k28.npg -o b476k28-1.txt -P40e12 -t4 this will take about 6 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242438 Posts |
I had missed the post initially Please reserve the sieving for only 4-5 bases at a time as a starting point. The effort required for each base is likely larger than what you are initially anticipating. It is difficult for the project to manage such large reservations and you may find that your initial enthusiasm wears off after doing many of them. After you've done 4-5 of them then just reserve a few more. Thanks.
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2016-11-24 at 09:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36
B5916 Posts |
Thanks.
Now, I only want to sieve 3 bases: S30 to n=1M S461 to n=1M R1019 to n=1M |
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
11001010112 Posts |
R549 sieved to p=20T, file attached.
Next one (R533) will be completed in 24 hours. By the way: Reserving S1021 |
|
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
R533 is completed to p=20T.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
Jul 2003
61110 Posts |
to gd_barnes:
may i remind you that R565 is already done and a question for R742: on the website and in the sieve-file there are 78 k´s but you wrote 79 k´s what is right? Last fiddled with by lalera on 2016-11-25 at 17:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242438 Posts |
Both issues fixed. Thanks for pointing them out. There are only 78 k's remaining for R742 so the sieve file is right and the pages have been corrected. When people post sieve files I do not closely inspect them so I welcome anyone to closely inspect the k's being sieved in the file. All that I generally do is take a cursory glance at the header to make sure the base and sieve depth are what the person posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
1040310 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sieving Drive all base 2/4 k's worked by CRUS | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 143 | 2014-10-21 23:55 |
| Some CRUS stats | vmod | Conjectures 'R Us | 213 | 2014-02-28 21:23 |
| What are your CRUS plans? | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 35 | 2013-11-09 09:03 |
| CRUS-like sieving challenge | CRGreathouse | Puzzles | 24 | 2011-10-28 18:30 |
| how high will CRUS go | Mini-Geek | Conjectures 'R Us | 1 | 2010-11-08 20:50 |