mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Hobbies > Chess > Other Chess Games

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2015-11-11, 23:38   #1
MooMoo2
 
MooMoo2's Avatar
 
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006

22×5×59 Posts
Default Move 5 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish

The poll for move 4 just closed, and the most popular move was Ngf3. Stockfish responded with 4...Nf6, and the FEN is:
rnbqkb1r/pp3ppp/4pn2/2pp4/3PP3/5N2/PPPN1PPP/R1BQKB1R w KQkq - 2 5

Game so far: 1.e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 c5 4. Ngf3 Nf6
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	position.png
Views:	126
Size:	12.0 KB
ID:	13405  
MooMoo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-12, 09:13   #2
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

2×11×149 Posts
Default

Well we're still "in the book". And Stockfish's last move maintains the tension in the centre and tempts us to advance 5.e5 after all.

Our e pawn is threatened again, and the two obvious methods of dealing with it are 5.e5 setting up the pawn chain (which Black will then ruthlessly attack as we head into the middlegame), or 5.exd5 going for the isolated queen's pawn position (Black's pawn on d5) which we could also have done last move. The difference with last move is that this time Black could reply 5...Nxd5.

A third move which is occasionally played here according to the databases is the intermediate checking move 5.Bb5+. If we did that we would be intending to exchange this bishop later on for whatever minor piece Black puts in the way, I guess, because otherwise we would lose time when Black later attacks our bishop with ...Qb6/a5 or possibly ...a6.

Which moves do people prefer?
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-12, 11:14   #3
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

23·683 Posts
Default

Looking at the database, e5 has better result than exd5, but while looking at performance rating delta, exd5 is faring slightly better. Perhaps deeper investigation of the lines is called for?
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-12, 12:22   #4
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

41×251 Posts
Default

Ha! Looking in those DBs, it seems for me like SF plays for a draw!
He just chose the move with the most chances to draw...
Which means we already won... psychologically
He is demoralized now...

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-11-12 at 12:24
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-13, 09:35   #5
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

2·11·149 Posts
Default

My preference is 5.exd5 on the grounds that this move seems to leave Black with the least chances of counterplay, a passive position in other words. 5.e5 on the other hand, while it sets up a pawn chain leaving Black temporarily cramped after 5...Nfd7 6.c3, gives Black clear chances to play against that pawn chain which we have the responsibility of defending. It's a bit similar to the Advance Variation of the French, 1.e4.e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5. I think that it is good strategy against a computer to deny it active play.
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-11-13, 13:39   #6
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand

41×251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-E View Post
5.exd5
I think we agree here, on all counts.
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stockfish-assisted game vs Stockfish, move 8 discussion MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 11 2016-10-21 15:47
Move 33 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 8 2016-04-23 14:07
Move 30 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 2 2016-04-03 19:55
Move 28 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 8 2016-03-30 12:24
Move 29 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 8 2016-03-29 10:27

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:52.


Fri Jul 7 03:52:20 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 1:20, 0 users, load averages: 1.17, 1.12, 1.13

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔