![]() |
|
|
#45 |
|
Jun 2003
5,051 Posts |
So, with d4 being the overwhelming favorite (me too!), is there a need for a poll, more discussion, or any other formalities? No other viable candidates have been proposed (save 2. d3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
Yes, definitively 2.d4
My vote: no need poll.
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-11-02 at 05:11 Reason: s/pool/poll/ - I always spell this wrong! |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | ||
|
Aug 2010
10011111102 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Stockfish's response is 2...d5. The FEN is: rnbqkbnr/ppp2ppp/4p3/3p4/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq d6 0 3 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
We are learning
![]() Looked on the web, and listened to the others who posted after us... Edit, but don't get too happy, it will get harder before getting easier... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-11-02 at 06:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
63058 Posts |
Perhaps it would indeed have been too pedantic for a move 2 poll since a lot of people said 2.d4 and that move would almost certainly have won in any poll. But perhaps there are people waiting in the wings who watch the discussion without taking part (shyness? nothing to add to what's already been said?), then might still vote in the poll. Something to bear in mind for future moves perhaps?
Now we have a major choice of lines. 3.Nc3 can lead to complex lines like the Winawer (3...Bb4) or MacCutcheon (3...Nf6 4,Bg5 Bb4), Classical (3...Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e5 Nfd7 6.Bxe7) or the Alekhine-Chatard attack (6.h4 in that last line). 3.e5 is the tricky Advance variation. 3.Nd2 is the more sedate Tarrasch variation. 3.exd5 is the exchange variation which has the reputation of frequently leading to a draw. What to do against a computer? If we want a strategic game without too many tricky tactical lines in order to use what we might hope is our superior positional understanding (yeah, right! ), I would suggest either of the last two, 3.Nd2 or 3.exd5.
Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2015-11-02 at 10:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Apr 2012
Brady
27·3 Posts |
What is Stockfish's blend of offense/defense? When it `senses` an attack, would it opt for an offense (usually the best defense)
or a defense? Has anyone noticed this? Would it be acceptable, assuming I suggested a move, for me to guess Stockfish's response and provide that as well? How many moves will it take to win/lose/draw this match? As a guess and assuming the humans lose, I would hope for 60-100 moves. Last fiddled with by jwaltos on 2015-11-02 at 20:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
203008 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2015-11-02 at 21:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | ||||
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
7×467 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Apr 2012
Brady
27×3 Posts |
e5 - set up an opportunity for en passant
Nc6 - expect response as two-prong threat on pawns/developing center presence/initiates opportunity to castle Last fiddled with by jwaltos on 2015-11-03 at 00:46 |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Perhaps a separate thread should be set up for each move...similar to the first 3 games for each team. This thread will get unwieldy quickly.
I believe that we will last at least 40 moves. If we stay in book for up to 15 moves we'd only have 25 moves left to hold our own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Quote:
http://www.365chess.com/opening.php?...&ns=3.16.12.17 I personally like 3. Nd2, a quieter variation. Note in the database that black wins quite a bit less frequently and that there are more draws than the more common 3. Nc3. 3. e5 appears weaker. After 3...c5, black has won more games than white in high level games. My suggestion is to keep in book as long as possible and attempt to play into quiet and drawish positions. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish-assisted game vs Stockfish, move 8 discussion | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 11 | 2016-10-21 15:47 |
| ftp.mersenneforum.org | Mark Rose | Forum Feedback | 11 | 2015-05-14 01:44 |
| The mersenneforum First 300 | ewmayer | Lounge | 15 | 2012-08-27 18:35 |
| HELP!! Can't Log In to mersenneforum | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 8 | 2010-09-06 18:24 |
| archives of mersenneforum.org? | masser | Forum Feedback | 2 | 2007-12-27 15:34 |