![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
An alternative might be to challenge a group of people. It wouldn't surprise me if the chess club at my uni would accept a challenge. That would be a good match.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006
22·5·59 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Anyone have any ideas for a good opening move? e4? d4? c4? Nf3? Something else? I'll make a poll with the moves brought up here later this week. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
240638 Posts |
I love the Sicilian "defense", with both black and white woods.
(the only one I know, hehe).Let's play 1. e4. OTOH, Brian may be right that we will lose, because when more people play, only some (i.e. few) will get the right move, and that only sometime (i.e. seldom). The most of the people and at most turns will "average" the votes, which will result in some average game. I expressed in the past my (pleasant) surprise that our games here on the forum were actually very good, "better than expected". ![]() From here the optimism: I think we can beat your bloody engine...
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-10-27 at 07:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
22·3·659 Posts |
If Stockfish moves first (improperly), I would attempt the 2 move checkmate. Otherwise, Nf3.
At some point I would like to overwhelm Stockfish with a complicated board full of options where ingenuity may surpass algorithmics. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
5×2,459 Posts |
I'm assuming that this is a joke. You expect the overwhelm a program playing at a rating of likely 2800-3000 with complicated options? You expect to attempt a 2-move checkmate against a program that can see 15-20 plies in many positions? Computers are at their best in complex technical positions. Likely the only chance that we would have would be to beat it will be with long-term quiet strategical positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
CCE16 Posts |
As well as 1.e4, 1.d4, 1.c4 and 1.Nf3, I'd also like to see the moves 1.b3 and 1.g3 in the poll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33×19 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006
22·5·59 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41×251 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-10-29 at 05:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
Quote:
Would 3 days of voting each move be okay, for example? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Jun 2003
546410 Posts |
I think "less than 24 hours" refers to time allotted to the machine to make the move, not for the humans?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish-assisted game vs Stockfish, move 8 discussion | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 11 | 2016-10-21 15:47 |
| ftp.mersenneforum.org | Mark Rose | Forum Feedback | 11 | 2015-05-14 01:44 |
| The mersenneforum First 300 | ewmayer | Lounge | 15 | 2012-08-27 18:35 |
| HELP!! Can't Log In to mersenneforum | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 8 | 2010-09-06 18:24 |
| archives of mersenneforum.org? | masser | Forum Feedback | 2 | 2007-12-27 15:34 |