mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Puzzles

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2015-10-13, 14:39   #12
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

723210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
I didn't say it was mathematically sound, I was trying to think like the OP might be thinking. Yet assumes I plan on going back to school again.
Keep out of the discussion until you know what you are talking about.
Your comments do not add anything and will only confuse the naiive reader.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 14:43   #13
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

23·3·5·72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Keep out of the discussion until you know what you are talking about.
Your comments do not add anything and will only confuse the naiive reader.
So judgemental. This is the Internet. You have no more say than anyone else.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 14:46   #14
alpertron
 
alpertron's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina

2·3·223 Posts
Default

I think that's why lots of computational power is used to trial factoring the Mersenne number 22^127-1-1. Unfortunately there are many people who believe (I do not why) that this particular number is prime.
alpertron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 14:48   #15
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

26·113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
So judgemental. This is the Internet. You have no more say than anyone else.
An idiotic notion. It implies that you believe that prose from someone who can't write a cogent English sentence
and whose knowledge of mathematics is nonsense has the same value as that of an expert.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 14:55   #16
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

16F816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
An idiotic notion. It implies that you believe that prose from someone who can't write a cogent English sentence
and whose knowledge of mathematics is nonsense has the same value as that of an expert.
No. It implies that you don't have any control over people like that and what they write. Trying to censor posters is not the right solution IMO. Better to educate readers and teach them that not everything they read is accurate or true. Encouraging critical thinking is far more valuable than promoting a nanny forum where everything is supposedly controlled.

Last fiddled with by retina on 2015-10-13 at 15:20 Reason: Errant 'a'
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 15:03   #17
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

26×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
No. It implies that you don't have any control over people like that and what they write. Trying to censor posters is not the right solution IMO. Better to educate readers and teach them that not everything they read is accurate or true. Encouraging critical thinking is far more valuable than a promoting a nanny forum where everything is supposedly controlled.
I am not promoting a nanny forum. But new participants (and non native English speakers)
whose math backgound is naiive may not be able to discern that SM88 spews nothing but nonsense.
And such a person will not have knowledge of SM88's long history of doing so.

And SM88's posts in this thread certainly distracts from the goal of trying to lead the OP to some
understanding of what constitutes a proof. Indeed, his posts throughout the forum greatly contribute
toward doing nothing but increasing the noise.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 15:18   #18
davar55
 
davar55's Avatar
 
May 2004
New York City

101468 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpertron View Post
I think that's why lots of computational power is used to trial factoring the Mersenne number 22^127-1-1. Unfortunately there are many people who believe (I do not why) that this particular number is prime.
Because it's pretty? Proof by esthetics.
davar55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 15:22   #19
alpertron
 
alpertron's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina

53A16 Posts
Default

This is for the original poster (other people please do not spoil):

Start with the number 41, which is prime.

Add the number 2 and you get 43, which is prime.

Then add 4 and you get 47 which is prime again.

Then add 6 and you get 53 which is prime again.

Do this procedure say 30 times and you will always get primes.

Now turn off the calculator. Does it mean that this always generates primes? If not, why not?

Last fiddled with by alpertron on 2015-10-13 at 15:27
alpertron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 15:23   #20
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

26×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpertron View Post
I think that's why lots of computational power is used to trial factoring the Mersenne number 22^127-1-1. Unfortunately there are many people who believe (I do not why) that this particular number is prime.
Fortunately, for people who have more than two working brain cells, mathematics is not done by "belief".
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 15:41   #21
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

723210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpertron View Post
This is for the original poster:

Start with the number 41, which is prime.

Add the number 2 and you get 43, which is prime.

Then add 4 and you get 47 which is prime again.

Then add 6 and you get 53 which is prime again.

Do this procedure say 30 times and you will always get primes.
This does not adequately describe the procedure. You have added 2, then 4, then 6.
"Do this 30 times" can be taken to mean, "add 2 then 4 then 6" 30 times. The
meaning of the word "this" in your last sentence is not well defined.

Math is a language in which it is possible to say exactly what is meant.



Quote:
Does it mean that this always generates primes? If not, why not?
Sigh. You are completely missing the point. I am not asking the OP to
supply missing reasoning. I am asking him/her to explain why merely posting
a sequence of numbers without any given reasoning might constitute a proof.

My merely stating that what was presented isn't a proof does not teach
anything. Indeed, it would constitute "proof by assertion".

I am trying to address the more basic question: "what is a proof?". To do so, we
must find out why the OP thought that what was presented is a proof. It isn't that the
"reasoning" is wrong. The problem (I am getting repetitive) is that there was no reasoning
supplied!
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2015-10-13, 15:50   #22
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

161008 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
This does not adequately describe the procedure. You have added 2, then 4, then 6.
"Do this 30 times" can be taken to mean, "add 2 then 4 then 6" 30 times. The
meaning of the word "this" in your last sentence is not well defined.

Math is a language in which it is possible to say exactly what is meant.





Sigh. You are completely missing the point. I am not asking the OP to
supply missing reasoning. I am asking him/her to explain why merely posting
a sequence of numbers without any given reasoning might constitute a proof.

My merely stating that what was presented isn't a proof does not teach
anything. Indeed, it would constitute "proof by assertion".

I am trying to address the more basic question: "what is a proof?". To do so, we
must find out why the OP thought that what was presented is a proof. It isn't that the
"reasoning" is wrong. The problem (I am getting repetitive) is that there was no reasoning
supplied!
See:

http://www.themathlab.com/geometry/funnyproofs.htm

The given list is incomplete, of course.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official AVX-512 programming thread ewmayer Programming 31 2016-10-14 05:49
Official Peeved Pets Thread Prime95 Lounge 32 2015-10-02 04:17
Official 'Let's move the hyphen!' thread. Flatlander Lounge 29 2013-01-12 19:29
Is MM127 Prime? Just a Poll jinydu Miscellaneous Math 57 2008-11-08 17:48
Official Odd Perfect Number thread ewmayer Math 14 2008-10-23 13:43

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:25.

Mon Nov 30 21:25:08 UTC 2020 up 81 days, 18:36, 2 users, load averages: 3.02, 2.65, 2.49

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.