![]() |
|
|
#67 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
Are you running your factors thru pfgw to verify that your sieving program is working correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36×13 Posts |
Indeed I am, for an independent validation.
Here are some quite big examples: Code:
$ ../../M/pfgw377/pfgw64.exe -o -d -q"Sm(937357) % 260889573299" PFGW Version 3.7.7.64BIT.20130722.Win_Dev [GWNUM 27.11] Sm(937357) % 260889573299 is Zero (0) $ ../../M/pfgw377/pfgw64.exe -o -d -q"Sm(950083) % 350500327669" ...is Zero (0) $ ../../M/pfgw377/pfgw64.exe -o -d -q"Sm(789529) % 350758089373" ...is Zero (0) |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
947710 Posts |
In case anyone is curious, I've set quorum to 1. Everyone will get a fresh first time test (good luck to everyone!).
DC will commence later... |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
Hi Serge,
I am averaging 36500 sec per candidate on my i7 4800MQ machine. Carlos |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36·13 Posts |
Yes, this sounds pretty good. This will go up, though. The run-time is roughly O(n^3) for the range that I've already run.
The i3-5010U has a tiny cache, so it takes a performance hit. I am pretty happy with the cheap laptop that I grabbed from Amazon recently ($349 + $22 for the second stick of memory). The EC2 Haswells (c4.8xlarge) are not terrifically fast but they are relatively cheap to play with: < 2c / hr-core. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
100101000001012 Posts |
Plenty of prime candidates are still available. Prime cuts, expertly sieved to 0.36T (and still sieiving).
Don't miss your chance! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
961110 Posts |
Took one. Will take more.
Can we multithread? (I mean, all cores working for the same assignment, and not running more workers, for that I am ok with multiple instances) Edit: 3M9 bits? Well, if I find a prime, it will be not only the biggest prime I ever found, but also one of the biggest primes I ever dreamed to find... I never thought too seriously to find million-digits primes...
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-10-22 at 06:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
Sorry for new post, time limit.
Took another. How can I do to have the Prime95's equivalent of "NoMoreWork=1"?(i.e. when the current assignment is finish, it will exit and/or wait for me, without reserving new work). I looked into the ini file but I can't find the option, the things seems related to "ctrl+c" only, or they "shut down" things which I don't know if it means the program or the computer. I will not want my computer shut down when the assignment is finished. Just not more work being reserved. I will only reserve work if I know I can do it, and not be in the situation to return it back or worse, forget about it at all. This is not something I do every day. edit: your "Found a factor!" caption of the picture should better be "Find a prime!"
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-10-22 at 08:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
This is what you need to set in prpclient.ini:
// stopasapoption= tells the client that it needs to be shutdown automatically, i.e. without // a CTRL-C. It is evaluated after each test is completed. It should be 0 upon startup. // The accepted values are: // 0 - Continue processing work units // 2 - Return completed work units and abandon the rest // 3 - Return completed work units (keep the rest) // 6 - Complete all work units and return them stopasapoption=0 Use option 2. You can edit while the program is running. No, you cannot multithread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
Thanks. I don't want to abandon anything, just finish all work I have and don't request new work. Option 6 is closer to what I want. Meantime I found out by experimenting that I can also use ctrl+c then input the option to finish the work and shut down, which is just a bad phrasing for "stop the program" (and not the computer).
P.S. Took another 4, about 3 hours ago. They will be finished in about 20-25 hours. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-10-22 at 15:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36·13 Posts |
I pre-filled all start/stop options to 9/0 on the deployment tarball to the EC2 (spot) nodes.
Code:
machineid=EC2-Or2 instanceid=3 server=SmarPRP:100:1:99.121.249.54:1200 pfgwexe=../pfgw64.exe ... normalpriority=1 // startoption= tells the client what to do when starting up and there is work that has startoption=9 // stopoption= tells the client what to do when it is stopped with CTRL-C and there is // 9 - Do nothing and shut down (presumes you will restart with startoption=9) stopoption=0 // stopasapoption= tells the client that it needs to be shutdown automatically, i.e. without stopasapoption=0 Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2015-10-22 at 21:56 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! | dabaichi | News | 571 | 2020-10-26 11:02 |
| Smarandache-Fibonacci Primes | rogue | And now for something completely different | 5 | 2016-07-18 14:33 |
| Smarandache-Wellin Primes | rogue | And now for something completely different | 25 | 2016-01-01 17:07 |
| Smarandache semiprimes | sean | Factoring | 15 | 2014-11-09 06:05 |
| disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD? | emily | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-03-01 05:49 |