Strategic Double Clicking

[Mark Rose]

I was also amused

[ric]

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's a new list of 3:1 bad/good, including a few with even higher bad/good ratios.

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
37062733	5	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=37062733,71,1
37063181	5	0	3	2	3	2	DoubleCheck=37063181,71,1
37179887	3	0	3	0	3	0	DoubleCheck=37179887,71,1
37433257	4	1	8	2	5	5	DoubleCheck=37433257,71,1
37436131	7	1	11	4	10	5	DoubleCheck=37436131,71,1
37465249	4	1	8	2	5	5	DoubleCheck=37465249,71,1
37674107	3	1	4	0	3	1	DoubleCheck=37674107,71,1
37812119	5	0	3	0	2	1	DoubleCheck=37812119,71,1
37933913	7	1	11	4	10	5	DoubleCheck=37933913,71,1
37934947	3	0	4	1	4	1	DoubleCheck=37934947,71,1

Taking the 37M ones.

[ric]

In the meanwhile, I've completed another set (#368): 6 candidates, 4 matching, 2 requiring TC (41M8 and 41M9).

Oh, and by the way, is there any summary for the overall work stream? Thinking about a very basic one (# of selected cands, completed, matching, requiring TC)...

[LaurV]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I was also amused

one short step to 'strategic double clits'...

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by frmky

Disagreed! I am amused.

I guess I missed it... I see what it is now "Bulemic Double Clicks"... was it something else?

Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the thread topics being changed... guess I'm an old fuddy duddy. And while I'm at it, you kids stay off my lawn!

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by ric

Oh, and by the way, is there any summary for the overall work stream? Thinking about a very basic one (# of selected cands, completed, matching, requiring TC)...

That probably would have been a good idea, but unfortunately I wasn't keeping track of the exponents listed here. I guess I could go back through and look them all up, see if they matched on the 2nd try or not. Might be a fun project for a rainy day.

Anecdotally I've been doing maybe 50/50 on which ones match or not, but I've been taking a mix of "speculative" stuff as well as a few "sure things". George has reported about the same.

[Dubslow]

Originally Posted by frmky

Disagreed! I am amused.

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I was also amused

I am sometimes amused, on threads where the posts have diverged a bit from the topic, and not some (relatively) serious ongoing discussion actually relating to GIMPS/other MF projects which might be looking to acquire new people. So this thread, the mfaktc/mfakto/CUDALucas/Prime95 threads, etc should all be off-limits IMO. Something like the factors found thread is somewhat more appropriate.

[LaurV]

Thanks for renaming it back. There was "agreed" that only topics in the lounge/fun/soapbox be exposed to title morphing, but some mods can't follow their own rules...

[kladner]

My thanks for the original title's return.

[ATH]

Nevermind, it is already assigned.

[Mark Rose]

Originally Posted by Dubslow

I am sometimes amused, on threads where the posts have diverged a bit from the topic, and not some (relatively) serious ongoing discussion actually relating to GIMPS/other MF projects which might be looking to acquire new people. So this thread, the mfaktc/mfakto/CUDALucas/Prime95 threads, etc should all be off-limits IMO. Something like the factors found thread is somewhat more appropriate.

Yes, I agree with you there, especially with the four you mentioned.