Strategic Double Clicking - Page 42

Prime95 · 2015-10-26, 19:28

Any machines that are set as "do what makes the most sense" gets a small percentage of DC work -- I'd have to look it up. A default install of prime95 will have this work preference. As an aside, I think we should up the percentage of DC work as DC is falling behind the LL wavefront by more than I like.

I'm reluctant to override settings for those that have explicitly selected first-time LL tests.

Edit: Percentage was 10%, now it is 20%.

LaurV · 2015-10-27, 01:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prime95

Edit: Percentage was 10%, now it is 20%.

We salute that!

cuBerBruce · 2015-10-27, 13:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's more. From machines with at least a 3:1 bad:good ratio, using the "by calendar year" method:

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
...
51981047	7	2	11	8	11	8	DoubleCheck=51981047,73,1
...

My residue matched on this one.

Madpoo · 2015-10-28, 15:59

Here's a fun and weird group of exponents up for grabs.

These are from machines with zero good, one or more bad, and only one solo-checked exponent left.

Kind of a crapshoot here... not enough data to say one way or another if their lone solo-checked thing will be good or bad except for the fact that they haven't had a good one yet. But as you can see some of them only have one bad one, so who knows.

There are a couple in there that would have been swept up with my 3:1 bad/good ratio query as well so I expect we'll have a better clue as to how those turn out.

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
34902599	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=34902599,71,1
34942693	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=34942693,71,1
35664833	1	0	2	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=35664833,71,1
35790331	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35790331,71,1
37702097	4	0	2	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=37702097,71,1
38128627	3	0	1	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=38128627,71,1
42270829	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=42270829,72,1
43728611	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=43728611,72,1
44130049	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44130049,72,1
44253581	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=44253581,72,1
46233977	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=46233977,72,1
46289773	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=46289773,72,1
47139277	2	0	1	6	1	6	DoubleCheck=47139277,72,1
50582549	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=50582549,71,1
52628813	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=52628813,72,1

chalsall · 2015-10-28, 16:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's a fun and weird group of exponents up for grabs.

I'll take them.

cuBerBruce · 2015-10-28, 16:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's a fun and weird group of exponents up for grabs.
...

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
34902599	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=34902599,71,1
...

I took this first one.

chalsall · 2015-10-28, 16:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuBerBruce

I took this first one.

We cross posted...

I've taken all but the first; the first is yours.

cuBerBruce · 2015-10-28, 16:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

We cross posted...

I've taken all but the first; the first is yours.

Yes, I noticed that. I grabbed, then posted. I guess you posted, then tried to grab.

chalsall · 2015-10-28, 16:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by cuBerBruce

Yes, I noticed that. I grabbed, then posted. I guess you posted, then tried to grab.

Yes. It actually worked out perfectly... I have 14 available high-speed(ish) CPUs, but there were 15 in the list. I tried to put the lowest one on a slower machine, but noticed it wasn't available.

lycorn · 2015-10-29, 08:26

@Madpoo,
I´ve noticed a fair amount of 2M exponents that have been very recently triple checked by you. As the previous runs were matching, and they appear legit, I´m curious about the criteria used to select those ones for TC.

cuBerBruce · 2015-10-30, 06:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's a fun and weird group of exponents up for grabs.
...

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
34902599	1	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=34902599,71,1
...

The residue I got for this one did not match.

2015-10-26, 19:28	#452
Prime95 P90 years forever! Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 19×397 Posts	Any machines that are set as "do what makes the most sense" gets a small percentage of DC work -- I'd have to look it up. A default install of prime95 will have this work preference. As an aside, I think we should up the percentage of DC work as DC is falling behind the LL wavefront by more than I like. I'm reluctant to override settings for those that have explicitly selected first-time LL tests. Edit: Percentage was 10%, now it is 20%. Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2015-10-26 at 19:32

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic	Mysticial	Software	52	2021-04-23 06:51
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page	marigonzes	Information & Answers	2	2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th?	jasong	jasong	7	2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1?	137ben	PrimeNet	6	2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume.	Uncwilly	Puzzles	8	2006-07-03 16:02

2015-10-29, 08:26	#461
lycorn "GIMFS" Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 2×11×67 Posts	@Madpoo, I´ve noticed a fair amount of 2M exponents that have been very recently triple checked by you. As the previous runs were matching, and they appear legit, I´m curious about the criteria used to select those ones for TC.