Strategic Double Clicking

[bloodIce]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

Because the same GPU ought to be able to LL it faster than doing the higher levels of TF...

Nope, the same GPU needs to do one LL test in couple of months, may be 1.

estimate how long it would take to factor 75 numbers from 75 bits to 76 bits to expect to find one factor.

I know that it is impossible to factor all for any practical time. However, I am advocating at least couple of levels in situations where you have mismatching residues or any other problematic LL test (remembering examples of 10 LL tests done, but some mismatched...). In some cases there will be a factor and the case is closed.

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by bloodIce

I know that it is impossible to factor all for any practical time. However, I am advocating at least couple of levels in situations where you have mismatching residues or any other problematic LL test (remembering examples of 10 LL tests done, but some mismatched...). In some cases there will be a factor and the case is closed.

I suppose what I should do is look again at whether any of these strategic double-check candidates have less than the GPU72 factor level. Then, at the very least, we can get those up to those levels ahead of time since we're usually doing double-checks far ahead of when it would be done normally.

I'll check again and see where we're at with those, and also with any new ones that need triple checking.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by Madpoo

I suppose what I should do is look again at whether any of these strategic double-check candidates have less than the GPU72 factor level.

Yes. Where GPU72 nominally takes the TF'ing level to for DC'ing is optimal. Going farther doesn't make sense from a cost / benefit perspective.

Originally Posted by Madpoo

I'll check again and see where we're at with those, and also with any new ones that need triple checking.

Just generate a list like before, and I'll add them to the "hopper" for prioritization.

And, this actually brings up something... If you include any that the "GPU Factoring" account holds as well (rather than limiting the list to those candidates not currently "owned" by anyone), I can set the "Priority" flag for those as well.

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by chalsall

Just generate a list like before, and I'll add them to the "hopper" for prioritization.

And, this actually brings up something... If you include any that the "GPU Factoring" account holds as well (rather than limiting the list to those candidates not currently "owned" by anyone), I can set the "Priority" flag for those as well.

Okay, here's a list of exponents where the system had more bad than good but need add'l TF work to get up to GPU72 goals.

54 of the 209 are already checked out to GPU72's account.

exponent	TF	WorkToDo
42381011	71	Factor=42381011,71,72
42381881	71	Factor=42381881,71,72
42392789	71	Factor=42392789,71,72
42394721	71	Factor=42394721,71,72
43144741	71	Factor=43144741,71,72
43689301	71	Factor=43689301,71,72
44906783	70	Factor=44906783,70,72
44913173	70	Factor=44913173,70,72
44946037	70	Factor=44946037,70,72
44971193	70	Factor=44971193,70,72
45046607	70	Factor=45046607,70,72
45095273	70	Factor=45095273,70,72
45135451	70	Factor=45135451,70,72
45172189	71	Factor=45172189,71,72
45253927	71	Factor=45253927,71,72
45333721	70	Factor=45333721,70,72
45381379	70	Factor=45381379,70,72
45521537	70	Factor=45521537,70,72
45790939	70	Factor=45790939,70,72
45819593	70	Factor=45819593,70,72
46018891	70	Factor=46018891,70,72
46047383	71	Factor=46047383,71,72
46048973	70	Factor=46048973,70,72
46134581	70	Factor=46134581,70,72
46140331	70	Factor=46140331,70,72
46233977	70	Factor=46233977,70,72
46289773	70	Factor=46289773,70,72
46296641	70	Factor=46296641,70,72
46300987	70	Factor=46300987,70,72
46514591	70	Factor=46514591,70,72
46564261	70	Factor=46564261,70,72
46582073	71	Factor=46582073,71,72
46727689	70	Factor=46727689,70,72
46849357	70	Factor=46849357,70,72
46976291	71	Factor=46976291,71,72
47002633	70	Factor=47002633,70,72
47029163	71	Factor=47029163,71,72
47092189	71	Factor=47092189,71,72
47124751	71	Factor=47124751,71,72
47127167	71	Factor=47127167,71,72
47139277	70	Factor=47139277,70,72
47164339	71	Factor=47164339,71,72
47207833	70	Factor=47207833,70,72
47224109	71	Factor=47224109,71,72
47283289	70	Factor=47283289,70,72
47374501	71	Factor=47374501,71,72
47425219	71	Factor=47425219,71,72
47454943	70	Factor=47454943,70,72
47473697	70	Factor=47473697,70,72
47523409	70	Factor=47523409,70,72
47550073	71	Factor=47550073,71,72
47556083	71	Factor=47556083,71,72
47561929	70	Factor=47561929,70,72
47568511	70	Factor=47568511,70,72
47601637	70	Factor=47601637,70,72
47611999	70	Factor=47611999,70,72
47615479	70	Factor=47615479,70,72
47617711	70	Factor=47617711,70,72
47645839	70	Factor=47645839,70,72
47665771	70	Factor=47665771,70,72
47679571	70	Factor=47679571,70,72
47771783	70	Factor=47771783,70,72
47784553	71	Factor=47784553,71,72
47811013	71	Factor=47811013,71,72
47908891	70	Factor=47908891,70,72
48093373	70	Factor=48093373,70,72
48124261	70	Factor=48124261,70,72
48614947	71	Factor=48614947,71,72
48762059	71	Factor=48762059,71,72
48796651	70	Factor=48796651,70,72
48959681	70	Factor=48959681,70,72
48961069	71	Factor=48961069,71,72
48962813	70	Factor=48962813,70,72
48973627	71	Factor=48973627,71,72
48985051	71	Factor=48985051,71,72
49011299	70	Factor=49011299,70,72
49432261	70	Factor=49432261,70,72
49482271	71	Factor=49482271,71,72
49653937	70	Factor=49653937,70,72
49798871	70	Factor=49798871,70,72
49972387	71	Factor=49972387,71,72
50010461	71	Factor=50010461,71,73
50015437	71	Factor=50015437,71,73
50071361	72	Factor=50071361,72,73
50134391	71	Factor=50134391,71,73
50183843	70	Factor=50183843,70,73
50231387	72	Factor=50231387,72,73
50251009	71	Factor=50251009,71,73
50440301	71	Factor=50440301,71,73
50454631	70	Factor=50454631,70,73
50478761	70	Factor=50478761,70,73
50485727	72	Factor=50485727,72,73
50495573	72	Factor=50495573,72,73
50501257	72	Factor=50501257,72,73
50629741	72	Factor=50629741,72,73
50630971	72	Factor=50630971,72,73
50644907	72	Factor=50644907,72,73
50673587	72	Factor=50673587,72,73
50681039	72	Factor=50681039,72,73
50736013	71	Factor=50736013,71,73
50736601	71	Factor=50736601,71,73
50794489	71	Factor=50794489,71,73
50803771	71	Factor=50803771,71,73
50815243	71	Factor=50815243,71,73
50836231	71	Factor=50836231,71,73
50856193	72	Factor=50856193,72,73
50980277	71	Factor=50980277,71,73
51070039	72	Factor=51070039,72,73
51082337	71	Factor=51082337,71,73
51113597	72	Factor=51113597,72,73
51157151	71	Factor=51157151,71,73
51221507	72	Factor=51221507,72,73
51262039	71	Factor=51262039,71,73
51279307	71	Factor=51279307,71,73
51310661	70	Factor=51310661,70,73
51350627	70	Factor=51350627,70,73
51398227	71	Factor=51398227,71,73
51608143	71	Factor=51608143,71,73
51728381	71	Factor=51728381,71,73
51734329	71	Factor=51734329,71,73
51767627	71	Factor=51767627,71,73
51971957	71	Factor=51971957,71,73
52036157	71	Factor=52036157,71,73
52040693	71	Factor=52040693,71,73
52046131	72	Factor=52046131,72,73
52208287	72	Factor=52208287,72,73
52271633	70	Factor=52271633,70,73
52432669	70	Factor=52432669,70,73
52451699	70	Factor=52451699,70,73
52502101	72	Factor=52502101,72,73
52573063	71	Factor=52573063,71,73
52578707	70	Factor=52578707,70,73
52706201	71	Factor=52706201,71,73
52708763	72	Factor=52708763,72,73
52765847	71	Factor=52765847,71,73
52795207	72	Factor=52795207,72,73
52840859	71	Factor=52840859,71,73
52842527	72	Factor=52842527,72,73
52941061	71	Factor=52941061,71,73
52946071	71	Factor=52946071,71,73
53024641	71	Factor=53024641,71,73
53080561	71	Factor=53080561,71,73
53229229	71	Factor=53229229,71,73
53246203	71	Factor=53246203,71,73
53251339	72	Factor=53251339,72,73
53280347	71	Factor=53280347,71,73
53311441	71	Factor=53311441,71,73
53326681	71	Factor=53326681,71,73
53487659	71	Factor=53487659,71,73
53584603	71	Factor=53584603,71,73
53614793	71	Factor=53614793,71,73
53702083	72	Factor=53702083,72,73
53731529	72	Factor=53731529,72,73
53792723	72	Factor=53792723,72,73
54025357	71	Factor=54025357,71,73
54025849	71	Factor=54025849,71,73
54033829	71	Factor=54033829,71,73
54110261	72	Factor=54110261,72,73
54181007	72	Factor=54181007,72,73
54182419	72	Factor=54182419,72,73
54190127	72	Factor=54190127,72,73
54264709	71	Factor=54264709,71,73
54296309	72	Factor=54296309,72,73
54316393	72	Factor=54316393,72,73
54363629	71	Factor=54363629,71,73
54371573	72	Factor=54371573,72,73
54375719	72	Factor=54375719,72,73
54379657	72	Factor=54379657,72,73
54387589	72	Factor=54387589,72,73
54395981	72	Factor=54395981,72,73
54399437	72	Factor=54399437,72,73
54412313	72	Factor=54412313,72,73
54412541	72	Factor=54412541,72,73
54447823	72	Factor=54447823,72,73
54468251	72	Factor=54468251,72,73
54474733	71	Factor=54474733,71,73
54485917	71	Factor=54485917,71,73
54590273	72	Factor=54590273,72,73
54669541	71	Factor=54669541,71,73
54920227	72	Factor=54920227,72,73
54930289	72	Factor=54930289,72,73
54954721	71	Factor=54954721,71,73
55079753	71	Factor=55079753,71,73
55135919	71	Factor=55135919,71,73
55254491	71	Factor=55254491,71,73
55280521	71	Factor=55280521,71,73
55347857	72	Factor=55347857,72,73
55421701	72	Factor=55421701,72,73
55675793	72	Factor=55675793,72,73
55696219	72	Factor=55696219,72,73
55932521	72	Factor=55932521,72,73
56061541	72	Factor=56061541,72,73
56127031	71	Factor=56127031,71,73
56153387	71	Factor=56153387,71,73
56343121	72	Factor=56343121,72,73
56382929	71	Factor=56382929,71,73
56437903	72	Factor=56437903,72,73
56510917	71	Factor=56510917,71,73
56525813	72	Factor=56525813,72,73
56537249	72	Factor=56537249,72,73
56540269	72	Factor=56540269,72,73
56608621	72	Factor=56608621,72,73
56676901	71	Factor=56676901,71,73
56680709	71	Factor=56680709,71,73
56680747	71	Factor=56680747,71,73
56707517	72	Factor=56707517,72,73
56874541	71	Factor=56874541,71,73
57857561	72	Factor=57857561,72,73
57936677	72	Factor=57936677,72,73

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Okay, here's a list of exponents where the system had more bad than good but need add'l TF work to get up to GPU72 goals.

Followed by 14 exponents that need a triple check but could use extra TF work as well. Half of them are already assigned to GPU72.

exponent	TF	WorkToDo
43253059	71	Factor=43253059,71,72
43254349	71	Factor=43254349,71,72
45608513	70	Factor=45608513,70,72
46513769	70	Factor=46513769,70,72
46856921	70	Factor=46856921,70,72
47523583	70	Factor=47523583,70,72
47584919	70	Factor=47584919,70,72
47643977	70	Factor=47643977,70,72
47717653	70	Factor=47717653,70,72
48760711	70	Factor=48760711,70,72
49632463	70	Factor=49632463,70,72
49789249	71	Factor=49789249,71,72
49899973	71	Factor=49899973,71,72
51513167	71	Factor=51513167,71,73

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Okay, here's a list of exponents where the system had more bad than good but need add'l TF work to get up to GPU72 goals.

OK, thanks. These are now all in the hopper and prioritized; 28 of those already assigned to GPU72 were already assigned for TF'ing (but not all 28 to the end goal).

Please feel free to bring forward such lists for additional priority TF'ing at any time, as your algorithms reveal additional suspect machines / candidates.

BTW, my machines have finished all of its SDC work (except for one, a high candidate on a slow machine). Please sir, may I have some more?

[frmky]

Originally Posted by Madpoo

52 of these below 38M. End result will be that, whatever the outcome, at least one of these previously "spotless" CPU's will have a bad result added to their account, which will hopefully feed into our strategic double checking:

I just reserved the last of this TC list.

[firejuggler]

Happy to report that
UID: firejuggler, M36417593 is not prime. Res64: 104739A81360C4__. We4: 968974F8,20897412,00000000, XXXXXXXXXX

and it doublecheck!

[Mark Rose]

Originally Posted by chalsall

OK, thanks. These are now all in the hopper and prioritized; 28 of those already assigned to GPU72 were already assigned for TF'ing (but not all 28 to the end goal).

A handful of those are currently assigned to me. I've prioritized them and they should be done in an hour or so.

[ric]

A brief heads-up, after the second batch of "anemic" <g> candidates:

• #236 & #237 6 candidates: 2 matching, 4 mismatches (of which 1 subsequently TC'd w/success);
• #357 8 candidates: 2 matching (had to be, they were both from Chuck Norris ahem... ), 6 mismatches.

Next round of other 6 cands to be started in a few days, ETC around Nov 10th. Will update as they complete.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by chalsall

I had asked before, and I'll now ask again: Are any of the machines which are less than perfect still being assigned LL candidates? If so, might they be assigned DC Cat 2 for a while?

Separately, as a policy, should perhaps all machines requesting LL work be assigned a small percentage of DC Cat 1 work, just in order to ensure their ongoing sanity?